Stevenson Richard J, Hill Brayson J, Hughes Alannah, Wright Madeline, Bartlett Johanna, Saluja Supreet, Francis Heather M
Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 21;14:1148413. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1148413. eCollection 2023.
Interoceptive individual differences have garnered interest because of their relationship with mental health. One type of individual difference that has received little attention is variability in the sensation/s that are understood to mean a particular interoceptive state, something that may be especially relevant for hunger. We examined if interoceptive hunger is multidimensional and idiosyncratic, if it is reliable, and if it is linked to dysfunctional eating and beliefs about the causes of hunger. Participants completed a survey just before a main meal, with most retested around 1 month later. We found that interoceptive hunger has 11 dimensions, and while people differ considerably in their combinations of interoceptive hungers, these represent only 4% of all possible permutations. Hunger reports were reliable. We found relationships between variability in hunger interoception and dysfunctional eating, especially for uncontrolled eating. We also found that hunger beliefs were in some cases strongly related to aspects of hunger interoception. The implications of these findings are discussed.
内感受性个体差异因其与心理健康的关系而受到关注。一种很少受到关注的个体差异类型是被理解为特定内感受状态的感觉的变异性,这一点可能与饥饿特别相关。我们研究了内感受性饥饿是否具有多维度性和独特性,是否可靠,以及它是否与功能失调性饮食和对饥饿原因的信念有关。参与者在正餐前完成了一项调查,大多数人在大约1个月后再次接受测试。我们发现内感受性饥饿有11个维度,虽然人们在内感受性饥饿的组合上有很大差异,但这些只占所有可能排列的4%。饥饿报告是可靠的。我们发现饥饿内感受的变异性与功能失调性饮食之间存在关联,尤其是在无节制饮食方面。我们还发现,在某些情况下,饥饿信念与饥饿内感受的各个方面密切相关。我们讨论了这些发现的意义。