Suppr超能文献

通过单根导管进行持续硬膜外镇痛(CEA),为青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)患者后路脊柱融合术(PSF)后提供深度镇痛。

Continuous Epidural Analgesia (CEA) via Single Catheter Providing Profound Analgesia for Pediatric Patients Following Posterior Spinal Fusion (PSF) in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS).

作者信息

Halpern Lloyd M, Velarde Abby R, Zhang De-An, Bronson William, Kogan Clark

机构信息

Pediatric Anesthesia, Shriners Children's Spokane, Spokane, USA.

Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Apr 3;15(4):e37066. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37066. eCollection 2023 Apr.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Posterior spinal fusion (PSF) is a commonly performed orthopedic procedure to correct scoliosis in children. Continuous epidural analgesia (CEA) is a proposed means of providing analgesia following PSF. Whether a single epidural catheter with the tip in the upper thorax can provide adequate analgesia for PSF, which often spans the upper thoracic to lower lumbar regions, is unresolved in the literature.

METHOD

In this single-center, retrospective study, we reviewed 69 consecutive patients undergoing PSF for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with CEA at our institution from October 1, 2020 to May 26, 2022. Data for the entire cohort was divided into two time intervals before and after epidural removal, group epidural (Epi) and group no epidural (No Epi). Daily intravenous and oral opioid morphine equivalents per kilogram (OME/kg) plus mean and maximal visual analogue pain scores (VAS 0-10) were recorded from post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge to the end of postoperative day (POD) three.  Results: 57 patients were included in the study. Opioid usage was 4.5 times greater in the 19 hours following removal of the epidural catheter when compared to the entire period (mean 65 hours) the epidural was in place (Group Epi 0.154 OME/kg vs Group No Epi 0.690 OME/kg, p<0.001). 51% (29/57) of patients did not require opioids (intravenous or oral) while the epidural was in place, all patients required opioids after epidural removal. Mean opioid usage while the epidural was in place was 9.3 OME, equivalent to approximately 6 mg of oxycodone. Mean and maximum pain scores increased significantly after removal of the epidural on POD 3 (mean pain score: Epi 3.4 (1.8) vs No Epi 4.1 (1.7); p<0.001) (max pain score: Epi 4.9 (2.5) vs No Epi 6.3 (2.1); p<0.001).  Conclusions: This is the first study we are aware of to report pain scores and cumulative opioid requirements for PSF patients receiving CEA with a single epidural catheter before and after epidural removal. Opioid usage increased over four times in the 19 hours after epidural removal compared to the total opioid requirements while the epidural was infusing. Mean and maximum pain scores increased significantly after removal of the epidural on POD 3. This study firmly establishes that CEA with a single epidural catheter can provide profound analgesia for patients having PSF for AIS.

摘要

引言

后路脊柱融合术(PSF)是一种常用于矫正儿童脊柱侧弯的骨科手术。连续硬膜外镇痛(CEA)是PSF术后一种推荐的镇痛方法。文献中尚未解决的问题是,一根尖端位于上胸部的单根硬膜外导管能否为通常跨越上胸部至下腰部区域的PSF提供足够的镇痛效果。

方法

在这项单中心回顾性研究中,我们回顾了2020年10月1日至2022年5月26日在我院接受CEA治疗青少年特发性脊柱侧弯(AIS)并行PSF的69例连续患者。整个队列的数据分为硬膜外导管拔除前后两个时间段,硬膜外组(Epi)和无硬膜外组(No Epi)。记录从麻醉后监护病房(PACU)出院至术后第3天结束时每日每千克静脉和口服阿片类吗啡等效剂量(OME/kg)以及平均和最大视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS 0-10)。结果:57例患者纳入研究。与硬膜外导管留置的整个时间段(平均65小时)相比,硬膜外导管拔除后的19小时内阿片类药物使用量增加了4.5倍(硬膜外组Epi为0.154 OME/kg,无硬膜外组No Epi为0.690 OME/kg,p<0.001)。51%(29/57)的患者在硬膜外导管留置期间不需要使用阿片类药物(静脉或口服),所有患者在硬膜外导管拔除后都需要使用阿片类药物。硬膜外导管留置期间的平均阿片类药物使用量为9.3 OME,相当于约6毫克羟考酮。术后第3天硬膜外导管拔除后,平均疼痛评分和最大疼痛评分显著增加(平均疼痛评分:硬膜外组Epi为3.4(1.8),无硬膜外组No Epi为4.1(1.7);p<0.001)(最大疼痛评分:硬膜外组Epi为4.9(2.5),无硬膜外组No Epi为6.3(2.1);p<0.001)。结论:这是我们所知的第一项报告接受CEA并使用单根硬膜外导管的PSF患者在硬膜外导管拔除前后疼痛评分和累积阿片类药物需求量的研究。与硬膜外输注期间的总阿片类药物需求量相比,硬膜外导管拔除后的19小时内阿片类药物使用量增加了四倍多。术后第3天硬膜外导管拔除后,平均疼痛评分和最大疼痛评分显著增加。这项研究明确证实,单根硬膜外导管的CEA可为接受AIS的PSF患者提供深度镇痛。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验