Suppr超能文献

骨水泥型与非骨水泥型半髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

The Comparison between Cemented and Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University / Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Institute of Hospital Management West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Orthop Surg. 2023 Jul;15(7):1719-1729. doi: 10.1111/os.13716. Epub 2023 May 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hemiarthroplasty is the standard treatment for patients with femoral neck fractures (FNFs). Controversy exists over the use of bone cement in hip fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE

We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to compare cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fractures.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted using Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, Wang Fang, and Sino Med databases. Studies comparing cemented with uncemented hemiarthroplasty for FNFs in elderly patients up to June 2022 were included. Data were extracted, meta-analyzed, and pooled as risk ratios (RRs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

RESULTS

Twenty-four RCTs involving 3471 patients (1749 cement; 1722 uncemented) were analyzed. Patients with cemented intervention had better outcomes regarding hip function, pain, and complications. Significant differences were found in terms of HHS at 6 weeks (WMD 12.5; 95% CI 6.0-17.0; P < 0.001), 3 months (WMD 3.3; 95% CI 1.6-5.0; P < 0.001), 4 months (WMD 7.3; 95% CI 3.4-11.2; P < 0.001), and 6 months (WMD 4.6; 95% CI 3.3-5.8; P < 0.001) postoperatively. Patients with cemented hemiarthroplasty had lower rates of pain (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.39-0.9; P = 0.013), prosthetic fracture (RR 0.24; 95% CI 0.16-0.38; P < 0.001), subsidence/loosening (RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.11-0.78; P = 0.014), revisions (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.40-0.89; P = 0.012), and pressure ulcers (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.23-0.82; P = 0.01) at the expense of longer surgery time (WMD 7.87; 95% CI 5.71-10.02; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated that patients with cemented hemiarthroplasty had better results in hip function and pain relief and lower complication rates at the expense of prolonged surgery time. Cemented hemiarthroplasty is recommended based on our findings.

摘要

背景

人工股骨头置换术是治疗股骨颈骨折(FNFs)患者的标准治疗方法。对于接受人工股骨头置换术治疗的髋部骨折患者是否使用骨水泥存在争议。

目的

我们进行了一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较股骨颈骨折患者中使用骨水泥固定和非骨水泥固定的人工股骨头置换术。

方法

使用 Cochrane Library、ScienceDirect、PubMed、Embase、Medline、Web of Science、CNKI、VIP、Wang Fang 和 Sino Med 数据库进行文献检索。纳入比较老年股骨颈骨折患者使用骨水泥固定和非骨水泥固定人工股骨头置换术的研究。提取数据,进行荟萃分析,并以风险比(RR)和加权均数差(WMD)及其 95%置信区间(95%CI)进行汇总。

结果

分析了 24 项随机对照试验,共纳入 3471 例患者(骨水泥组 1749 例,非骨水泥组 1722 例)。骨水泥干预组患者的髋关节功能、疼痛和并发症结局更好。在术后 6 周(WMD 12.5;95%CI 6.0-17.0;P<0.001)、3 个月(WMD 3.3;95%CI 1.6-5.0;P<0.001)、4 个月(WMD 7.3;95%CI 3.4-11.2;P<0.001)和 6 个月(WMD 4.6;95%CI 3.3-5.8;P<0.001)时,髋关节功能评分更高。骨水泥固定组患者疼痛发生率(RR 0.59;95%CI 0.39-0.9;P=0.013)、假体骨折发生率(RR 0.24;95%CI 0.16-0.38;P<0.001)、下沉/松动发生率(RR 0.29;95%CI 0.11-0.78;P=0.014)、翻修率(RR 0.59;95%CI 0.40-0.89;P=0.012)和压疮发生率(RR 0.43;95%CI 0.23-0.82;P=0.01)更低,但手术时间更长(WMD 7.87;95%CI 5.71-10.02;P<0.001)。

结论

这项荟萃分析表明,骨水泥固定人工股骨头置换术患者在髋关节功能和疼痛缓解方面的效果更好,并发症发生率更低,但手术时间更长。根据我们的发现,推荐使用骨水泥固定人工股骨头置换术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e52/10350391/30d03a1eda98/OS-15-1719-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验