Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, AZ Delta Roeselare, Roeselare, Belgium.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Oct;31(10):4171-4178. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07448-2. Epub 2023 May 8.
Appropriate positioning and alignment of tibial and femoral component in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are factors of major importance directly related to patient satisfaction and implant survival. Most literature works elaborate on overall post-operative alignment and its correlation to implant survival. However, less is known about the impact of individual component alignment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of undercorrection of overall alignment as well as the effect of individual tibial and femoral component alignment on the post-operative failure rate after total knee arthroplasty.
Clinical and radiographic data of primary TKA cases from 2002 to 2004, with a minimum of 10-year follow-up, were retrospectively reviewed. The pre- and post-operative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) were measured on weight-bearing, full-length antero-posterior lower limb radiographs. Statistical analysis was performed to establish the correlation between both overall and implant alignment and revision rate.
In total, 379 primary TKA cases were evaluated. The mean time of follow-up was 12.9 years (range 10.3-15.9 years, SD = 1.8). Nine out of 379 cases were revised due to aseptic loosening; the mean time to revision was 5.5 years (range 1.0-15.5 years, SD = 4.6). Varus undercorrection of overall alignment was not associated with a higher rate of revision (p = 0.316). Post-operative valgus femoral alignment (mLDFA < 87°) contributed to a significant decreased prosthesis survival in contrast to neutral femoral alignment (revision rate valgus group: 10.7% and neutral group: 1.7%; p = 0.003). Post-operative tibial mechanical alignment was not identified as a significant predictor for implant survival (revision rate varus group: 2.9% and neutral group: 2.4%; p = 0.855).
Primary TKA showed significantly higher revision rates when the femoral component was placed in > 3° of valgus (mLDFA < 87°). In contrast, postoperative overall residual varus alignment (HKA) and varus alignment of the tibial component were not related to higher revision rates at a minimum 10-year follow-up after TKA. These findings should be considered when choosing component position in individualised TKA.
III.
初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)中胫骨和股骨部件的适当定位和对线是与患者满意度和植入物存活率直接相关的重要因素。大多数文献都详细阐述了术后整体对线及其与植入物存活率的关系。然而,关于个别组件对线的影响知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨整体对线校正不足以及胫骨和股骨组件对线的影响对 TKA 后术后失败率的影响。
回顾性分析 2002 年至 2004 年初次 TKA 病例的临床和影像学资料,随访时间至少 10 年。在负重、全长前后下肢 X 线片上测量术前和术后髋膝踝角(HKA)、机械外侧远端股骨角(mLDFA)和机械内侧近端胫骨角(mMPTA)。进行统计分析以确定整体和植入物对线与翻修率之间的相关性。
共评估了 379 例初次 TKA 病例。平均随访时间为 12.9 年(范围为 10.3-15.9 年,SD=1.8)。379 例中有 9 例因无菌性松动而翻修;翻修的平均时间为 5.5 年(范围为 1.0-15.5 年,SD=4.6)。整体对线的内翻校正不足与较高的翻修率无关(p=0.316)。术后股骨对线外翻(mLDFA<87°)与中性股骨对线相比显著降低了假体存活率(外翻组翻修率:10.7%,中性组翻修率:1.7%;p=0.003)。术后胫骨机械对线未被确定为假体存活率的显著预测因子(外翻组翻修率:2.9%,中性组翻修率:2.4%;p=0.855)。
当股骨部件放置在 3°以上的外翻(mLDFA<87°)时,初次 TKA 的翻修率明显较高。相比之下,在 TKA 后至少 10 年的随访中,术后整体残留内翻对线(HKA)和胫骨部件的内翻对线与较高的翻修率无关。在个体化 TKA 中选择组件位置时应考虑这些发现。
III 级。