• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直肠癌手术:低容量是否意味着更差的结果——单外科医生经验。

Rectal cancer surgery: does low volume imply worse outcome-a single surgeon experience.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Galway Clinic, Galway, Ireland.

Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Dec;192(6):2673-2679. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03372-z. Epub 2023 May 8.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-023-03372-z
PMID:37154997
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10165279/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The centralisation of rectal cancer management to high-volume oncology centres has translated to improved oncological and survival outcomes. We hypothesise that individual surgeon caseload, specialisation, and experience may be as significant in determining oncologic and postoperative outcomes in rectal cancer surgery.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained colorectal surgery database was reviewed for patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery between January 2004 and June 2020. Data studied included demographics, Dukes' and TNM staging, neoadjuvant treatment, preoperative risk assessment scores, postoperative complications, 30-day readmission rates, length of stay (LOS), and long-term survival. Primary outcome measures were 30-day mortality and long-term survival compared to national and international standards and best practice guidelines.

RESULTS

In total, 87 patients were included (mean age: 66 years [range: 36-88]). The mean length of stay (LOS) was 16.5 days (SD 6.0). The median ICU LOS was 3 days (range 2-17). Overall, 30-day readmission rate was 16.4%. Twenty-four patients (26.4%) experienced ≥ 1 postoperative complication. The 30-day operative mortality rate was 3.45%. Overall 5-year survival rate was 66.6%. A significant correlation was observed between P-POSSUM scores and postoperative complications (p = 0.041), and all four variants of POSSUM, CR-POSSUM, and P-POSSUM scores and 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

Despite improved outcomes seen with centralisation of rectal cancer services at an institutional level, surgeon caseload, experience, and specialisation is of similar importance in obtaining optimal outcomes within institutions.

摘要

背景

直肠癌管理向高容量肿瘤中心的集中化已经转化为改善的肿瘤学和生存结果。我们假设,在直肠癌手术中,个体外科医生的手术量、专业化和经验可能与肿瘤学和术后结果同样重要。

方法

回顾了 2004 年 1 月至 2020 年 6 月期间接受直肠癌手术的患者的前瞻性维护的结直肠外科手术数据库。研究的数据包括人口统计学、Dukes 和 TNM 分期、新辅助治疗、术前风险评估评分、术后并发症、30 天再入院率、住院时间(LOS)和长期生存。主要结局测量指标是与国家和国际标准和最佳实践指南相比的 30 天死亡率和长期生存。

结果

总共纳入了 87 例患者(平均年龄:66 岁[范围:36-88 岁])。平均住院时间(LOS)为 16.5 天(SD 6.0)。中位数 ICU LOS 为 3 天(范围 2-17)。总体而言,30 天再入院率为 16.4%。24 例(26.4%)患者经历了≥1 种术后并发症。30 天手术死亡率为 3.45%。总体 5 年生存率为 66.6%。P-POSSUM 评分与术后并发症之间存在显著相关性(p=0.041),以及所有四种 POSSUM、CR-POSSUM 和 P-POSSUM 评分与 30 天死亡率之间存在显著相关性。

结论

尽管直肠癌服务在机构层面上的集中化带来了改善的结果,但外科医生的手术量、经验和专业化在机构内获得最佳结果方面同样重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36f7/10165279/0892769a5831/11845_2023_3372_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36f7/10165279/0892769a5831/11845_2023_3372_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36f7/10165279/0892769a5831/11845_2023_3372_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Rectal cancer surgery: does low volume imply worse outcome-a single surgeon experience.直肠癌手术:低容量是否意味着更差的结果——单外科医生经验。
Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Dec;192(6):2673-2679. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03372-z. Epub 2023 May 8.
2
Workload and surgeon's specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery.结直肠癌手术后的工作量及外科医生专业与手术结果的关系
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD005391. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005391.pub3.
3
Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark.丹麦结直肠癌的生存情况
Dan Med J. 2012 Apr;59(4):B4428.
4
Rectal cancer surgery: volume-outcome analysis.直肠癌手术:量效分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010 Dec;25(12):1389-96. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-1019-1. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
5
Does IBD Portend Worse Outcomes in Patients with Rectal Cancer? A Case-Matched Analysis.IBD 是否预示直肠癌患者预后更差?一项病例匹配分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Sep;63(9):1265-1275. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001666.
6
Compliance With Preoperative Elements of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Rectal Cancer Surgery Checklist Improves Pathologic and Postoperative Outcomes.符合美国结直肠外科协会直肠癌手术检查表的术前要素可改善病理和术后结果。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Jan;63(1):30-38. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001511.
7
Long-term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Single Specialized Center Experience.微创与开放式经腹会阴直肠切除术治疗直肠癌的长期疗效:单中心经验
Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 Mar 1;65(3):361-372. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002067.
8
A preliminary audit experience of surgery for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.新辅助放化疗后直肠癌手术的初步审计经验。
Tumori. 2010 Mar-Apr;96(2):260-5. doi: 10.1177/030089161009600212.
9
The long-term oncological outcomes of the 140 robotic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a single surgeon experience.140例机器人保留括约肌全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的长期肿瘤学结局:单中心经验
J Robot Surg. 2020 Aug;14(4):655-661. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01037-7. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
10
Factors associated with oncologic outcomes after abdominoperineal resection compared with restorative resection for low rectal cancer: patient- and tumor-related or technical factors only?与保肛直肠切除术相比,腹会阴联合切除术治疗低位直肠癌的肿瘤学结局相关因素:仅与患者和肿瘤相关或与技术相关因素?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Jan;55(1):51-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182351c1f.

本文引用的文献

1
Covid-19: Private hospitals "fell well short" in delivering care during the pandemic, says report.报告称,新冠疫情期间私立医院在提供医疗服务方面“远远不足”。
BMJ. 2021 Oct 8;375:n2471. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2471.
2
Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open rectal cancer resections: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌切除术的肿瘤学结局:随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2021 May 27;108(5):469-476. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaa154.
3
Cancer and coronavirus disease 2019; how do we manage cancer optimally through a public health crisis?
癌症与2019冠状病毒病;在公共卫生危机期间,我们如何实现癌症的最佳管理?
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jun;132:98-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.04.001. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
4
Nationwide in-hospital mortality rate following rectal resection for rectal cancer according to annual hospital volume in Germany.德国根据年度医院手术量统计的直肠癌直肠切除术后全国住院死亡率。
BJS Open. 2020 Apr;4(2):310-319. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50254. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
5
Effects of laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: An update systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜与机器人辅助直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的效果:一项更新的系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Asian J Surg. 2019 Jun;42(6):657-666. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.11.007. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
6
The Impact of Hospital Volume and Charlson Score on Postoperative Mortality of Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: A Nationwide Study of 45,569 Patients.医院容量和 Charlson 评分对直肠癌直肠切除术术后死亡率的影响:一项涉及 45569 名患者的全国性研究。
Ann Surg. 2018 Nov;268(5):854-860. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002898.
7
The changing cost of breast cancer care: lessons from a centralised modern cancer centre.乳腺癌护理成本的变化:来自一个集中式现代癌症中心的经验教训。
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 May;188(2):409-414. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1872-4. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
8
The influence of hospital volume on long-term oncological outcome after rectal cancer surgery.医院规模对直肠癌手术后长期肿瘤学结局的影响。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Dec;32(12):1741-1747. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2889-2. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
9
Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a comparative study of clinical outcomes and costs.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌:临床结局和成本的比较研究
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Oct;32(10):1423-1429. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2876-7. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
10
Postoperative Complications: Looking Forward to a Safer Future.术后并发症:展望更安全的未来。
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016 Sep;29(3):246-52. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584501.