Suppr超能文献

相信我的手势或言语:在交流中,听众如何选择信息渠道?

Trust my gesture or my word: How do listeners choose the information channel during communication?

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Koc University.

Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2024 Apr;50(4):674-686. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001253. Epub 2023 May 8.

Abstract

Information can be conveyed via multiple channels such as verbal and gestural (visual) channels during communication. Sometimes the information from different channels does not match (e.g., saying right while pointing to the left). How do addressees choose which information to act upon in such cases? In two experiments, we investigated this issue by having participants follow instructions on how to move objects on the screen. Experiment 1 examined whether people's choice of channel can be altered by feedback favoring either the verbal or the gestural channel. In Experiment 2, there was no feedback and participants were free to choose either channel. We also assessed participants' verbal and visuospatial working memory capacities. Results showed that, when faced with contradicting information, there is a natural bias at the group level toward relying on the verbal channel, although this bias can be temporarily altered by probabilistic feedback. Moreover, when labels were shorter and of higher frequency, participants relied more on the verbal channel. In the absence of feedback, the capacity of individuals' visual, but not verbal, working memory determined reliance on one channel versus the other. Collectively, these results show that information selection in communication is influenced by group-level biases, as well as the properties of items and characteristics of individuals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

信息可以通过多种渠道传递,例如在交流过程中的口头和手势(视觉)渠道。有时,来自不同渠道的信息并不匹配(例如,说右而指向左)。在这种情况下,收件人如何选择要采取的信息?在两项实验中,我们通过让参与者按照如何在屏幕上移动对象的说明进行操作来研究这个问题。实验 1 检验了人们的渠道选择是否可以通过有利于口头或手势渠道的反馈来改变。在实验 2 中,没有反馈,参与者可以自由选择任何渠道。我们还评估了参与者的口头和视空间工作记忆容量。结果表明,面对相互矛盾的信息,在群体层面上存在一种自然的偏向,即倾向于依赖口头渠道,尽管这种偏向可以通过概率反馈暂时改变。此外,当标签更短且频率更高时,参与者更依赖口头渠道。在没有反馈的情况下,个体的视觉工作记忆能力,而不是口头工作记忆能力,决定了对一个渠道的依赖程度。总的来说,这些结果表明,沟通中的信息选择受到群体层面偏见的影响,以及项目的属性和个体的特征的影响。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验