Gerber Manuela, Dürr Salome, Bodmer Michèle
Clinic for Ruminants, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland.
Veterinary Public Health Institute, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Jan 18;7:611682. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.611682. eCollection 2020.
The aim of this study was to reduce antimicrobial use (AMU) on dairy farms that implemented evidence-based management strategies. The study not only examined whether these strategies led to a reduction in AMU in practice, but also examined the influence of the level of their implementation on AMU. For data analysis, practice software recordings of the farm veterinarians were used. The AMU data of 50 farms with prevention strategies applied (intervention group, IG) over 3 years (2017-2019) and of 74 farms without prevention strategies (control group, CG) over 2 years (2018-2019) were analyzed. Project participation was supported with 500 Swiss francs (~545 USD) per farmer per year. The AMU was compared between the IG and CG using the treatment incidence. In December 2017/January 2018, the farmers of the IG had chosen at least one of the proposed 17 prevention strategies from one of three sectors, i.e., udder health, uterine health and/or replacement calf health. The prevention strategies, were developed in a standard operating procedure protocol and were discussed in detail with the farmers before the implementation. Forty-eight farms chose at least one udder strategy, 10 farms at least one uterine strategy and 37 farms at least one calf strategy. By choosing an udder health strategy or a uterine health strategy, the corresponding systemically administered AMU could be significantly reduced ( < 0.04) in the IG compared with the CG. In addition, udder strategies that were well-implemented led to a significant reduction ( = 0.05) of intramammary "highest priority critically important antimicrobials (HPCIA)" (quinolones, cephalosporins 3rd and higher generation, macrolides and ketolides, glycopeptides, and polymyxins). The level of implementation was significantly lower in 2019 compared to 2018 ( < 0.05, Fisher's exact test). No significant reduction in AMU could be achieved for the calf sector. A reduction of AMU in dairy farms is possible by implementing evidence-based management-related prevention strategies. The level of implementation has only an influence on the consumption of HPCIA. The reduction of AMU in practice by means of evidence-based measures requires supportive human resources instead of financial support, because financial support for farmers seems not to motivate them sufficiently.
本研究的目的是在实施循证管理策略的奶牛场减少抗菌药物使用(AMU)。该研究不仅考察了这些策略在实际中是否能降低AMU,还考察了其实施水平对AMU的影响。数据分析采用农场兽医的实践软件记录。分析了2017 - 2019年3年间应用预防策略的50个农场(干预组,IG)和2018 - 2019年2年间未应用预防策略的74个农场(对照组,CG)的AMU数据。项目参与每年为每位农民提供500瑞士法郎(约545美元)的支持。使用治疗发病率对IG和CG之间的AMU进行比较。2017年12月/2018年1月,IG组的农民从乳房健康、子宫健康和/或后备犊牛健康这三个领域中至少选择了一项提议的17种预防策略中的一种。这些预防策略在标准操作程序协议中制定,并在实施前与农民进行了详细讨论。48个农场选择了至少一项乳房策略,10个农场选择了至少一项子宫策略,37个农场选择了至少一项犊牛策略。通过选择乳房健康策略或子宫健康策略,与CG相比,IG组相应的全身给药AMU可显著降低(<0.04)。此外,实施良好的乳房策略导致乳房内“最高优先级 critically important antimicrobials(HPCIA)”(喹诺酮类、第三代及更高代头孢菌素、大环内酯类和酮内酯类、糖肽类和多粘菌素类)显著减少(=0.05)。与2018年相比,2019年的实施水平显著降低(<0.05,Fisher精确检验)。犊牛领域的AMU未能实现显著降低。通过实施与循证管理相关的预防策略,奶牛场的AMU有可能降低。实施水平仅对HPCIA的使用有影响。通过循证措施在实际中降低AMU需要支持性的人力资源而非资金支持,因为对农民的资金支持似乎不足以充分激励他们。