• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线集中注意力训练(OCAT):两项原理验证研究对认知偏差、反刍思维和焦虑症状的迁移效应。

Online Contingent Attention Training (OCAT): transfer effects to cognitive biases, rumination, and anxiety symptoms from two proof-of-principle studies.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, 28223, Madrid, Spain.

Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 May 8;8(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00480-3.

DOI:10.1186/s41235-023-00480-3
PMID:37156967
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10166036/
Abstract

The aim of the present research was to develop and test the efficacy of a novel online contingent attention training (i.e., OCAT) to modify attention and interpretation biases, improve emotion regulation, and reduce emotional symptom levels in the face of major stressors. Two proof-of-principle studies were carried out. In study 1, 64 undergraduates who were about to start a major stressful period (i.e., final exams) were randomized to undergo 10 days of active OCAT or a sham-control training. Emotion regulation (habitual use of rumination and reappraisal) and symptom levels (depression and anxiety) were assessed before and after the intervention. In study 2, the same 2 × 2 mixed design was used with 58 individuals from the general population undergoing a major stressful situation (the lockdown period at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020). In both studies, the OCAT group showed significant improvements on attention towards negative information and interpretation biases in comparison to the sham-control group. Additionally, changes in cognitive biases transferred to reductions of participants' use of rumination and anxiety symptom levels. These results show preliminary evidence regarding the efficacy of the OCAT to target attention and interpretation biases as well as to improve emotion regulation processes and to buffer against the effects of major stressors.

摘要

本研究旨在开发和测试一种新的在线集中注意力训练(即 OCAT)的疗效,以改变注意力和解释偏差,改善情绪调节,并在面对主要压力源时降低情绪症状水平。进行了两项原理验证研究。在研究 1 中,64 名即将进入主要压力期(即期末考试)的本科生被随机分配接受 10 天的积极 OCAT 或假对照训练。在干预前后评估情绪调节(习惯性的沉思和重新评价的使用)和症状水平(抑郁和焦虑)。在研究 2 中,使用相同的 2×2 混合设计,对来自普通人群的 58 名在 2020 年 COVID-19 大流行期间经历主要压力情况(封锁期间)的个体进行了研究。在这两项研究中,OCAT 组在注意负性信息和解释偏差方面与假对照组相比有显著改善。此外,认知偏差的变化转化为参与者沉思和焦虑症状水平的降低。这些结果初步证明了 OCAT 针对注意力和解释偏差以及改善情绪调节过程并缓冲主要压力源影响的疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/10167067/f7245649b546/41235_2023_480_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/10167067/434a7acdc563/41235_2023_480_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/10167067/33d92cb02183/41235_2023_480_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/10167067/e1f799632392/41235_2023_480_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/10167067/e15355ed1adf/41235_2023_480_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/10167067/b4f013134f76/41235_2023_480_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/10167067/846aa7e9f8fa/41235_2023_480_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/10167067/41c975925cd4/41235_2023_480_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/10167067/f62de7f2c0c6/41235_2023_480_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/10167067/e9e9fca6a8cb/41235_2023_480_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/10167067/72671b1caba6/41235_2023_480_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/10167067/f7245649b546/41235_2023_480_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/10167067/434a7acdc563/41235_2023_480_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/10167067/33d92cb02183/41235_2023_480_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/10167067/e1f799632392/41235_2023_480_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/10167067/e15355ed1adf/41235_2023_480_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/10167067/b4f013134f76/41235_2023_480_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/10167067/846aa7e9f8fa/41235_2023_480_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/10167067/41c975925cd4/41235_2023_480_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/10167067/f62de7f2c0c6/41235_2023_480_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/10167067/e9e9fca6a8cb/41235_2023_480_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/10167067/72671b1caba6/41235_2023_480_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/10167067/f7245649b546/41235_2023_480_Fig11_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Online Contingent Attention Training (OCAT): transfer effects to cognitive biases, rumination, and anxiety symptoms from two proof-of-principle studies.在线集中注意力训练(OCAT):两项原理验证研究对认知偏差、反刍思维和焦虑症状的迁移效应。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 May 8;8(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00480-3.
2
An Online Assessment to Evaluate the Role of Cognitive Biases and Emotion Regulation Strategies for Mental Health During the COVID-19 Lockdown of 2020: Structural Equation Modeling Study.一项在线评估,以评估2020年新冠疫情封锁期间认知偏差和情绪调节策略对心理健康的作用:结构方程模型研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Nov 2;8(11):e30961. doi: 10.2196/30961.
3
Training-related improvements in mental well-being through reduction in negative interpretation bias: A randomized trial of online socio-emotional dyadic and mindfulness interventions.通过减少负面解释偏差来提高心理健康:在线社会情感双人和正念干预的随机试验。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Jun 1;354:662-672. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.03.037. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
4
A novel process-based approach to improve resilience: Effects of computerized mouse-based (gaze)contingent attention training (MCAT) on reappraisal and rumination.一种基于新型流程的提高韧性的方法:基于计算机鼠标的(凝视)随附注意训练(MCAT)对情绪重评和反刍的影响。
Behav Res Ther. 2019 Jul;118:110-120. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
5
Asymmetrical transfer effects of cognitive bias modification: Modifying attention to threat influences interpretation of emotional ambiguity, but not vice versa.认知偏差修正的不对称转移效应:改变对威胁的注意力会影响对情绪模糊性的解读,但反之则不然。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2017 Mar;54:239-246. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.08.011. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
6
Eye-gaze contingent attention training (ECAT): Examining the causal role of attention regulation in reappraisal and rumination.眼动注视相关注意训练(ECAT):探究注意调节在重新评价和沉思中的因果作用。
Biol Psychol. 2019 Mar;142:116-125. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.01.017. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
7
Attention, interpretation, and memory biases in subclinical depression: a proof-of-principle test of the combined cognitive biases hypothesis.亚临床抑郁的注意、解释和记忆偏差:联合认知偏差假说的原理验证测试。
Emotion. 2014 Apr;14(2):331-40. doi: 10.1037/a0035250. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
8
Mapping the interplay among cognitive biases, emotion regulation, and depressive symptoms.描绘认知偏差、情绪调节和抑郁症状之间的相互作用。
Cogn Emot. 2017 Jun;31(4):726-735. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1144561. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
9
Modification of cognitive biases related to posttraumatic stress: A systematic review and research agenda.创伤后应激相关认知偏差的修正:系统评价与研究议程
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Jun;54:81-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
10
Cognitive bias modification for interpretation with and without prior repetitive negative thinking to reduce worry and rumination in generalised anxiety disorder and depression: protocol for a multisession experimental study with an active control condition.针对伴有和不伴有既往反复消极思维的解释进行认知偏差修正,以减少广泛性焦虑症和抑郁症中的担忧和沉思:一项带有积极对照条件的多阶段实验研究方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 16;6(12):e013404. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013404.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive Biases and Emotional Symptomatology as Predictors of Changes in Peer Victimization: A Longitudinal Structural Equation Modeling Study.认知偏差与情绪症状学作为同伴受害变化的预测因素:一项纵向结构方程模型研究
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.1007/s10802-025-01337-7.
2
Do we interpret ambiguity and feel according to how we define ourselves? Relationships between self-perception, interpretation biases, and their role on emotional symptoms.我们是否根据对自己的定义来解读模糊性并产生感受?自我认知、解读偏差之间的关系及其对情绪症状的作用。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 20;15:1502130. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1502130. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Negative interpretation bias as a clinical marker and a scar of depression: New insights from a large-scale study of the scrambled sentence task in formerly, subclinically and clinically depressed individuals.消极解释偏差作为抑郁症的临床标志物和创伤:来自一项针对既往有过、亚临床及临床抑郁症患者的乱序句子任务大规模研究的新见解。
Behav Res Ther. 2023 Apr;163:104276. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2023.104276. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
2
An Online Assessment to Evaluate the Role of Cognitive Biases and Emotion Regulation Strategies for Mental Health During the COVID-19 Lockdown of 2020: Structural Equation Modeling Study.一项在线评估,以评估2020年新冠疫情封锁期间认知偏差和情绪调节策略对心理健康的作用:结构方程模型研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Nov 2;8(11):e30961. doi: 10.2196/30961.
3
Neurobiology and systems biology of stress resilience.
应激弹性的神经生物学和系统生物学。
Physiol Rev. 2024 Jul 1;104(3):1205-1263. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00042.2023. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
Psychological Adjustment in Spain during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Positive and Negative Mental Health Outcomes in the General Population.西班牙在 COVID-19 大流行期间的心理调整:普通人群的积极和消极心理健康结果。
Span J Psychol. 2021 Feb 8;24:e8. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2021.7.
4
Anxiety, depression, traumatic stress and COVID-19-related anxiety in the UK general population during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间英国普通人群中的焦虑、抑郁、创伤应激及与新冠病毒相关的焦虑
BJPsych Open. 2020 Oct 19;6(6):e125. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.109.
5
A randomized controlled trial of gaze-contingent music reward therapy for major depressive disorder.一项针对重性抑郁障碍的基于注视的音乐奖励疗法的随机对照试验。
Depress Anxiety. 2021 Feb;38(2):134-145. doi: 10.1002/da.23089. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
6
Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depressive disorders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.认知偏差矫正干预对焦虑症和抑郁症的疗效:一项系统评价和网状meta分析
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;7(6):506-514. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30130-9. Epub 2020 May 20.
7
A network meta-analysis of the effects of psychotherapies, pharmacotherapies and their combination in the treatment of adult depression.心理治疗、药物治疗及其联合应用对成人抑郁症治疗效果的网状Meta分析。
World Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;19(1):92-107. doi: 10.1002/wps.20701.
8
Attentional biases in dysphoria when happy and sad faces are simultaneously presented.同时呈现快乐和悲伤面孔时,抑郁者的注意力偏差。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2019 Dec;65:101499. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.101499. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
9
A novel process-based approach to improve resilience: Effects of computerized mouse-based (gaze)contingent attention training (MCAT) on reappraisal and rumination.一种基于新型流程的提高韧性的方法:基于计算机鼠标的(凝视)随附注意训练(MCAT)对情绪重评和反刍的影响。
Behav Res Ther. 2019 Jul;118:110-120. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
10
Attentional disengagement from emotional information predicts future depression via changes in ruminative brooding: A five-month longitudinal eye-tracking study.注意从情绪信息中解脱出来可以通过沉思性反刍的变化来预测未来的抑郁:一项为期五个月的眼动追踪研究。
Behav Res Ther. 2019 Jul;118:30-42. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.03.013. Epub 2019 Mar 27.