Suppr超能文献

在一项比较二甲双胍与安慰剂治疗激素受体阳性早期乳腺癌的随机双盲试验(CCTG MA32)中,参与者中二甲双胍、安慰剂和内分泌治疗停药。

Metformin, placebo, and endocrine therapy discontinuation among participants in a randomized double-blind trial of metformin vs placebo in hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer (CCTG MA32).

机构信息

Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jul;200(1):93-102. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-06922-2. Epub 2023 May 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The MA32 study investigated whether 5 years of metformin (versus placebo) improves invasive disease-free survival in early-stage breast cancer (BC). Non-adherence to endocrine therapy (ET) and medications for chronic conditions is common and increases with drug toxicity and polypharmacy. This secondary analysis evaluates rates and predictors of early discontinuation of metformin, placebo, and ET among participants with HR-positive BC.

METHODS

Patients with high-risk non-metastatic BC were randomized to 60 months of metformin (850 mg BID) or placebo BID. Patients were administered bottles of metformin/placebo every 180 days. Metformin/placebo adherence was defined as a bottle dispensed at month 48 or later. The ET adherence analysis included patients with HR-positive BC who received ET with start and stop date reported, with adherence defined as > 48 months of use. Associations of covariates with study drug and ET adherence were examined using multivariable models.

RESULTS

Among the 2521 HR-positive BC patients, 32.9% were non-adherent to study drug. Non-adherence was higher among patients on metformin vs placebo (37.1% vs 28.7%, p < 0.001). Reassuringly, ET discontinuation rates were similar between treatment arms (28.4% vs 28.0%, p = 0.86). Patients who were non-adherent to ET were more likely to discontinue study therapy (38.8% vs 30.1%, p < 0.0001). In a multivariable analysis, study drug non-adherence was increased with metformin vs placebo (OR: 1.50, 95% CI 1.25-1.80; p < 0.0001); non-adherence to ET (OR: 1.47, 95% CI 1.20-1.79, p < 0.0001); grade 1 or greater GI toxicity during the first 2 years; lower age; and higher body mass index.

CONCLUSION

While non-adherence was higher among patients on metformin, it was still considerable among patients on placebo. Reassuringly, treatment arm allocation did not impact ET adherence. Attention to global medication adherence is needed to improve BC and non-oncological outcomes in cancer survivors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01.

摘要

背景

MA32 研究旨在探讨 5 年二甲双胍(与安慰剂相比)是否改善早期乳腺癌(BC)的侵袭性无病生存期。内分泌治疗(ET)和治疗慢性疾病药物的不依从是常见的,并且随着药物毒性和多药治疗的增加而增加。这项二次分析评估了 HR 阳性 BC 患者中早期停用二甲双胍、安慰剂和 ET 的发生率和预测因素。

方法

将高危非转移性 BC 患者随机分配至 60 个月的二甲双胍(850mg BID)或安慰剂 BID。患者每 180 天接受一瓶二甲双胍/安慰剂。二甲双胍/安慰剂的依从性定义为第 48 个月或之后开瓶。ET 依从性分析包括接受 HR 阳性 BC 并报告 ET 起始和停止日期的患者,定义为使用>48 个月。使用多变量模型检查协变量与研究药物和 ET 依从性的相关性。

结果

在 2521 例 HR 阳性 BC 患者中,32.9%的患者不依从研究药物。与安慰剂相比,服用二甲双胍的患者不依从率更高(37.1% vs 28.7%,p<0.001)。令人欣慰的是,治疗组之间的 ET 停药率相似(28.4% vs 28.0%,p=0.86)。不依从 ET 的患者更有可能停止研究治疗(38.8% vs 30.1%,p<0.0001)。在多变量分析中,与安慰剂相比,服用二甲双胍会增加药物不依从性(OR:1.50,95%CI 1.25-1.80;p<0.0001);不依从 ET(OR:1.47,95%CI 1.20-1.79,p<0.0001);前 2 年发生 1 级或更高级别的胃肠道毒性;年龄较小;以及更高的体重指数。

结论

尽管服用二甲双胍的患者不依从率更高,但服用安慰剂的患者不依从率仍然相当高。令人欣慰的是,治疗组的分配并没有影响 ET 的依从性。需要关注整体药物依从性,以改善癌症幸存者的 BC 和非肿瘤学结局。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验