Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Apr;17(4):425-439. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00613-0. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
In the PALOMA-3 study, the combination of the CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitor palbociclib and fulvestrant was associated with significant improvements in progression-free survival compared with fulvestrant plus placebo in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Identification of patients most suitable for the addition of palbociclib to endocrine therapy after tumour recurrence is crucial for treatment optimisation in metastatic breast cancer. We aimed to confirm our earlier findings with this extended follow-up and show our results for subgroup and biomarker analyses.
In this multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 study, women aged 18 years or older with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that had progressed on previous endocrine therapy were stratified by sensitivity to previous hormonal therapy, menopausal status, and presence of visceral metastasis at 144 centres in 17 countries. Eligible patients-ie, any menopausal status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, measurable disease or bone disease only, and disease relapse or progression after previous endocrine therapy for advanced disease during treatment or within 12 months of completion of adjuvant therapy-were randomly assigned (2:1) via a centralised interactive web-based and voice-based randomisation system to receive oral palbociclib (125 mg daily for 3 weeks followed by a week off over 28-day cycles) plus 500 mg fulvestrant (intramuscular injection on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1; then on day 1 of subsequent 28-day cycles) or placebo plus fulvestrant. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Analysis was by intention to treat. We also assessed endocrine therapy resistance by clinical parameters, quantitative hormone-receptor expression, and tumour PIK3CA mutational status in circulating DNA at baseline. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01942135.
Between Oct 7, 2013, and Aug 26, 2014, 521 patients were randomly assigned, 347 to fulvestrant plus palbociclib and 174 to fulvestrant plus placebo. Study enrolment is closed and overall survival follow-up is in progress. By March 16, 2015, 259 progression-free-survival events had occurred (145 in the fulvestrant plus palbociclib group and 114 in the fulvestrant plus placebo group); median follow-up was 8·9 months (IQR 8·7-9·2). Median progression-free survival was 9·5 months (95% CI 9·2-11·0) in the fulvestrant plus palbociclib group and 4·6 months (3·5-5·6) in the fulvestrant plus placebo group (hazard ratio 0·46, 95% CI 0·36-0·59, p<0·0001). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 251 (73%) of 345 patients in the fulvestrant plus palbociclib group and 38 (22%) of 172 patients in the fulvestrant plus placebo group. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (223 [65%] in the fulvestrant plus palbociclib group and one [1%] in the fulvestrant plus placebo group), anaemia (ten [3%] and three [2%]), and leucopenia (95 [28%] and two [1%]). Serious adverse events (all causalities) occurred in 44 patients (13%) of 345 in the fulvestrant plus palbociclib group and 30 (17%) of 172 patients in the fulvestrant plus placebo group. PIK3CA mutation was detected in the plasma DNA of 129 (33%) of 395 patients for whom these data were available. Neither PIK3CA status nor hormone-receptor expression level significantly affected treatment response.
Fulvestrant plus palbociclib was associated with significant and consistent improvement in progression-free survival compared with fulvestrant plus placebo, irrespective of the degree of endocrine resistance, hormone-receptor expression level, and PIK3CA mutational status. The combination could be considered as a therapeutic option for patients with recurrent hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that has progressed on previous endocrine therapy.
Pfizer.
在 PALOMA-3 研究中,与安慰剂加氟维司群相比,CDK4 和 CDK6 抑制剂帕博西尼联合氟维司群可显著改善转移性乳腺癌患者的无进展生存期。对于转移性乳腺癌患者,在肿瘤复发后,确定最适合添加帕博西尼联合内分泌治疗的患者对于治疗优化至关重要。我们旨在通过此次扩展随访来证实我们早期的发现,并展示我们的亚组和生物标志物分析结果。
在这项多中心、双盲、随机 3 期研究中,17 个国家的 144 个中心招募了年龄在 18 岁及以上、对先前内分泌治疗进展的激素受体阳性、HER2 阴性转移性乳腺癌患者,按对先前激素治疗的敏感性、绝经状态和内脏转移的存在情况进行分层。合格患者(即任何绝经状态、东部肿瘤协作组体力状态 0-1、可测量疾病或仅骨疾病、以及晚期疾病治疗期间或辅助治疗完成后 12 个月内疾病复发或进展)通过集中的基于网络和语音的交互随机化系统随机分配(2:1),接受口服帕博西尼(125 mg,每日一次,连用 3 周,然后在 28 天周期中停药一周)联合氟维司群(第 1 天和第 15 天各注射 500 mg,随后在接下来的 28 天周期的第 1 天注射)或安慰剂联合氟维司群。主要终点是研究者评估的无进展生存期。分析采用意向治疗。我们还通过临床参数、定量激素受体表达和基线时循环 DNA 中的肿瘤 PIK3CA 突变状态评估内分泌治疗耐药性。这项研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT01942135。
在 2013 年 10 月 7 日至 2014 年 8 月 26 日期间,共招募了 521 名患者,其中 347 名接受氟维司群加帕博西尼治疗,174 名接受氟维司群加安慰剂治疗。研究已完成入组,正在进行总生存随访。截至 2015 年 3 月 16 日,共发生 259 例无进展生存期事件(氟维司群加帕博西尼组 145 例,氟维司群加安慰剂组 114 例);中位随访时间为 8.9 个月(IQR 8.7-9.2)。氟维司群加帕博西尼组的中位无进展生存期为 9.5 个月(95%CI 9.2-11.0),氟维司群加安慰剂组为 4.6 个月(3.5-5.6)(风险比 0.46,95%CI 0.36-0.59,p<0.0001)。氟维司群加帕博西尼组 345 名患者中有 251 名(73%)和氟维司群加安慰剂组 172 名患者中有 38 名(22%)发生 3 级或 4 级不良事件。最常见的 3 级或 4 级不良事件是中性粒细胞减少症(氟维司群加帕博西尼组 223 例[65%],氟维司群加安慰剂组 1 例[1%])、贫血(氟维司群加帕博西尼组 10 例[3%],氟维司群加安慰剂组 3 例[2%])和白细胞减少症(氟维司群加帕博西尼组 95 例[28%],氟维司群加安慰剂组 2 例[1%])。氟维司群加帕博西尼组 345 名患者中有 44 名(13%)和氟维司群加安慰剂组 172 名患者中有 30 名(17%)发生严重不良事件(所有病因)。对于有这些数据的 395 名患者中的 129 名(33%),在血浆 DNA 中检测到 PIK3CA 突变。PIK3CA 状态或激素受体表达水平均与治疗反应无显著相关性。
与氟维司群加安慰剂相比,氟维司群加帕博西尼可显著改善无进展生存期,与内分泌耐药程度、激素受体表达水平和 PIK3CA 突变状态无关。对于接受过内分泌治疗后进展的激素受体阳性、HER2 阴性转移性乳腺癌患者,联合治疗可作为一种治疗选择。
辉瑞公司。