Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2023 Aug;29(5):709-715. doi: 10.1111/jep.13824. Epub 2023 May 8.
Patient-oriented research (POR) is a trend that has emerged over several decades and is particularly prominent in Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom. It involves patient and other stakeholder participation in the planning, conduct and dissemination of biomedical and health services research and it can be seen as a form of public participation and engagement in activities that affect the lives and well-being of communities. Criticisms of POR revolve around its susceptibility to tokenistic treatment of patient participants and paternalistic dominance of the research agenda by professional researchers, academics and clinicians. This commentary addresses one such critique by situating the POR agenda within the challenges and dilemmas faced by the health-related research enterprise over the past 30 years. It will explore the interface between POR, community activism and community-based participatory research. The contextual importance of the COVID-19 pandemic experience is stressed. The commentary will particularly focus on the US-based Patient Centred Outcomes Research Institute, its origins within a movement to enhance emphasis on publicly funded comparative effectiveness research, and its more recent evolution in the direction of community empowerment in POR.
以患者为中心的研究(POR)是几十年来出现的一种趋势,在加拿大、美国和英国尤为突出。它涉及患者和其他利益相关者参与生物医学和卫生服务研究的规划、实施和传播,可以被视为一种公众参与和参与影响社区生活和福祉的活动的形式。对 POR 的批评围绕着它对患者参与者的象征性对待以及专业研究人员、学者和临床医生对研究议程的家长式主导地位的敏感性。本评论通过将 POR 议程置于过去 30 年来与健康相关的研究企业所面临的挑战和困境中来解决这一批评之一。它将探讨 POR、社区行动主义和基于社区的参与式研究之间的接口。强调了 COVID-19 大流行经验的背景重要性。评论将特别关注美国的患者为中心的结果研究学会,其起源于增强对公共资助的比较效益研究的重视的运动,以及其在 POR 中朝着社区赋权方向的最新演变。