• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

福岛研究:使 2 型糖尿病患者参与行为相关改变(反馈):一项群组随机对照试验的研究方案。

Fukushima study for Engaging people with type 2 Diabetes in Behaviour Associated Change (FEEDBACK): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Research Center for Health Policy and Economics, Hitotsubashi University, 2-1 Naka, Kunitachi, Tokyo, 186-8601, Japan.

Department of Community and Family Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima, 960-1247, Japan.

出版信息

Trials. 2023 May 8;24(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07345-6.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-023-07345-6
PMID:37158959
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10169507/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The growing burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and the rising cost of healthcare worldwide make it imperative to identify interventions that can promote sustained self-management behaviour in T2DM populations while minimising costs for healthcare systems. The present FEEDBACK study (Fukushima study for Engaging people with type 2 Diabetes in Behaviour Associated Change) aims to evaluate the effects of a novel behaviour change intervention designed to be easily implemented and scaled across a wide range of primary care settings.

METHODS

A cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a 6-month follow-up will be conducted to evaluate the effects of the FEEDBACK intervention. FEEDBACK is a personalised, multi-component intervention intended to be delivered by general practitioners during a routine diabetes consultation. It consists of five steps aimed at enhancing doctor-patient partnership to motivate self-management behaviour: (1) communication of cardiovascular risks using a 'heart age' tool, (2) goal setting, (3) action planning, (4) behavioural contracting, and (5) feedback on behaviour. We aim to recruit 264 adults with T2DM and suboptimal glycaemic control from 20 primary care practices in Japan (cluster units) that will be randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group. The primary outcome measure will be the change in HbA1c levels at 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcome measures include the change in cardiovascular risk score, the probability to achieve the recommended glycaemic target (HbA1c <7.0% [53mmol/mol]) at 6-month follow-up, and a range of behavioural and psychosocial variables. The planned primary analyses will be carried out at the individual level, according to the intention-to-treat principle. Between-group comparisons for the primary outcome will be analysed using mixed-effects models. This study protocol received ethical approval from the research ethics committee of Kashima Hospital, Fukushima, Japan (reference number: 2022002).

DISCUSSION

This article describes the design of a cluster RCT that will evaluate the effects of FEEDBACK, a personalised, multicomponent intervention aimed at enhancing doctor-patient partnership to engage adults with T2DM more effectively in self-management behaviour.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study protocol was prospectively registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR ID UMIN000049643 assigned on 29/11/2022). On submission of this manuscript, recruitment of participants is ongoing.

摘要

背景

2 型糖尿病(T2DM)负担不断加重,全球医疗保健成本不断上升,因此迫切需要找到能够在 T2DM 人群中促进持续自我管理行为的干预措施,同时尽量减少医疗保健系统的成本。本研究旨在评估一种新的行为改变干预措施的效果,该干预措施旨在便于在广泛的初级保健环境中实施和推广。

方法

这是一项为期 6 个月随访的群组随机对照试验(RCT),旨在评估 FEEDBACK 干预的效果。FEEDBACK 是一种个性化的多组分干预措施,旨在由全科医生在常规糖尿病咨询期间提供。它由五个步骤组成,旨在增强医患合作关系,激励自我管理行为:(1)使用“心脏年龄”工具沟通心血管风险,(2)设定目标,(3)制定行动计划,(4)行为契约,以及(5)反馈行为。我们计划从日本 20 个初级保健机构(群组单位)招募 264 名 T2DM 患者和血糖控制不理想的成年人,将他们随机分配到干预组或对照组。主要结局测量指标是 6 个月随访时 HbA1c 水平的变化。次要结局指标包括心血管风险评分的变化、6 个月随访时达到推荐血糖目标(HbA1c<7.0%[53mmol/mol])的概率,以及一系列行为和心理社会变量。计划的主要分析将根据意向治疗原则在个体水平上进行。将使用混合效应模型对主要结局的组间比较进行分析。本研究方案已获得日本福岛县鹿岛医院的研究伦理委员会批准(编号:2022002)。

讨论

本文描述了一项群组 RCT 的设计,该 RCT 将评估 FEEDBACK 的效果,FEEDBACK 是一种个性化的多组分干预措施,旨在增强医患合作关系,使更多的 T2DM 成年人更有效地参与自我管理行为。

试验注册

该研究方案于 2022 年 11 月 29 日在 UMIN 临床试验注册中心(UMIN-CTR ID UMIN000049643)前瞻性注册。在提交本文时,参与者的招募正在进行中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c5d/10169507/d2c4369587b7/13063_2023_7345_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c5d/10169507/d2c4369587b7/13063_2023_7345_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c5d/10169507/d2c4369587b7/13063_2023_7345_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Fukushima study for Engaging people with type 2 Diabetes in Behaviour Associated Change (FEEDBACK): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.福岛研究:使 2 型糖尿病患者参与行为相关改变(反馈):一项群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 May 8;24(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07345-6.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The impact of an intervention to increase uptake to structured self-management education for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care (the embedding package), compared to usual care, on glycaemic control: study protocol for a mixed methods study incorporating a wait-list cluster randomised controlled trial.一项旨在提高 2 型糖尿病患者在基层医疗中接受结构化自我管理教育的干预措施(嵌入方案)的影响,与常规护理相比,对血糖控制的影响:一项混合方法研究的研究方案,包括等待名单聚类随机对照试验。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Nov 7;20(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1038-0.
4
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.
5
BetaMe: impact of a comprehensive digital health programme on HbA1c and weight at 12 months for people with diabetes and pre-diabetes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.BetaMe:一项综合数字健康计划对糖尿病和糖尿病前期患者12个月时糖化血红蛋白和体重的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Mar 5;19(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2528-4.
6
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果:系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
7
Protocol paper: multi-Centre randomised controlled trial evaluating a pre-clinic diabetes assessment and mapped care planning intervention amongst adults with type 1, type 2 or pre-diabetes.方案论文:一项多中心随机对照试验,评估 1 型、2 型或糖尿病前期成人的预诊所糖尿病评估和映射护理计划干预。
Trials. 2022 Jun 20;23(1):515. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06475-7.
8
Movement as Medicine for Type 2 Diabetes: protocol for an open pilot study and external pilot clustered randomised controlled trial to assess acceptability, feasibility and fidelity of a multifaceted behavioural intervention targeting physical activity in primary care.运动作为2型糖尿病的治疗手段:一项开放性预试验及外部预试验整群随机对照试验的方案,以评估针对初级保健中身体活动的多方面行为干预的可接受性、可行性和保真度。
Trials. 2014 Feb 3;15:46. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-46.
9
Effectiveness of a self-management intervention with personalised genetic and lifestyle-related risk information on coronary heart disease and diabetes-related risk in type 2 diabetes (CoRDia): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项针对2型糖尿病患者冠心病和糖尿病相关风险的自我管理干预措施,结合个性化遗传和生活方式相关风险信息的效果(CoRDia):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Dec 2;16:547. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1073-7.
10
Does the behavioural type-specific approach for type 2 diabetes promote changes in lifestyle? Protocol of a cluster randomised trial in Japan.2型糖尿病的行为类型特异性方法是否能促进生活方式的改变?日本一项整群随机试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 24;7(10):e017838. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017838.

引用本文的文献

1
Overcoming barriers to primary care research in Japan: a call to action.克服日本初级保健研究的障碍:行动呼吁。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2025 Mar 14;56:101523. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101523. eCollection 2025 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
An Intuitive Risk Communication Tool to Enhance Patient-Provider Partnership in Diabetes Consultation.一种直观的风险沟通工具,用于增强糖尿病咨询中的医患伙伴关系。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Jul;16(4):988-994. doi: 10.1177/1932296821995800. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
2
Japanese Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes 2019.《2019年日本糖尿病临床实践指南》
J Diabetes Investig. 2020 Jul;11(4):1020-1076. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13306.
3
Global, regional, and national burden and trend of diabetes in 195 countries and territories: an analysis from 1990 to 2025.
全球、地区和国家 195 个国家和地区的糖尿病负担和趋势:1990 年至 2025 年的分析。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 8;10(1):14790. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71908-9.
4
Intra-cluster correlation coefficients in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension.基层医疗中 2 型糖尿病和高血压患者的群内相关系数。
Trials. 2020 Jun 16;21(1):530. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04349-4.
5
6. Glycemic Targets: .6. 血糖目标: 。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S66-S76. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S006.
6
How effective are 'age' tools at changing patient behaviour? A rapid review.“年龄”工具在改变患者行为方面的效果如何?快速综述。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2020 Apr;25(2):1-2. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111244. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
7
Interventions for self-management of type 2 diabetes: An integrative review.2型糖尿病自我管理的干预措施:一项综合综述。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2018 Dec 14;6(1):70-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.12.002. eCollection 2019 Jan 10.
8
The association between health literacy levels and patient-reported outcomes in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients.日本2型糖尿病患者的健康素养水平与患者报告结局之间的关联。
SAGE Open Med. 2019 Jul 23;7:2050312119865647. doi: 10.1177/2050312119865647. eCollection 2019.
9
The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2019).日本高血压学会高血压管理指南(JSH 2019)。
Hypertens Res. 2019 Sep;42(9):1235-1481. doi: 10.1038/s41440-019-0284-9.
10
Baseline testing in cluster randomised controlled trials: should this be done?在整群随机对照试验中进行基线测试:是否应该这样做?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 May 17;19(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0750-8.