Smeets Nori J L, Raaijmakers Lieke P M, van der Zanden Tjitske M, Male Christoph, de Wildt Saskia N
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Intensive Care and Department of Paediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Sep;89(9):2888-2901. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15781. Epub 2023 Jun 4.
Off-label drug use in the paediatric population is common, and the lack of high-quality efficacy studies poses patients at risk for failing pharmacotherapy. Next to efficacy studies, pharmacokinetic (PK) studies are increasingly used to inform paediatric dose selection. As resources for paediatric trials are limited, we aimed to summarize existing PK and efficacy studies to identify knowledge gaps in available evidence supporting paediatric dosing recommendations, thereby taking paediatric cardiovascular drugs as proof of concept.
For each cardiovascular drug, paediatric indication and prespecified age group, together comprising one record, the authorized state was assessed. Next, for off-label records, the highest level of evidence was scored. High-quality efficacy studies were defined as meta-analysis or randomized controlled trials. Other comparative research, noncomparative research or consensus-based expert opinions were considered low quality. The level of evidence for PK studies was scored per drug and per age group, but regardless of indication.
A total of 58 drugs included 417 records, of which 279 (67%) were off-label. Of all off-label records, the majority (81%) were not supported by high-quality efficacy studies, but for 140 of these records (62%) high-quality PK studies were available.
We demonstrated that for the majority of off-label cardiovascular drugs, only low-quality efficacy studies were available. However, high-quality PK studies were frequently available. Combining these PK data with extrapolation of efficacy data from adults may help to close the current information gap and prioritize the drugs for which clinical studies and safety data are urgently needed.
儿科人群中使用未标注适应证药物的情况很常见,而缺乏高质量的疗效研究使患者面临药物治疗失败的风险。除疗效研究外,药代动力学(PK)研究越来越多地用于指导儿科剂量选择。由于儿科试验资源有限,我们旨在总结现有的PK和疗效研究,以确定支持儿科给药建议的现有证据中的知识空白,从而以儿科心血管药物作为概念验证。
对于每种心血管药物、儿科适应证和预先指定的年龄组(共同构成一条记录),评估其批准状态。接下来,对于未标注适应证的记录,对最高证据水平进行评分。高质量的疗效研究定义为荟萃分析或随机对照试验。其他比较性研究、非比较性研究或基于共识的专家意见被视为低质量。PK研究的证据水平按药物和年龄组进行评分,但不考虑适应证。
总共58种药物包括417条记录,其中279条(67%)为未标注适应证。在所有未标注适应证的记录中,大多数(81%)没有高质量疗效研究的支持,但其中140条记录(62%)有高质量的PK研究。
我们证明,对于大多数未标注适应证的心血管药物,仅有低质量的疗效研究。然而,高质量的PK研究却很常见。将这些PK数据与来自成人的疗效数据外推相结合,可能有助于填补当前的信息空白,并确定急需进行临床研究和安全数据研究的药物的优先级。