• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用标准化感染比评估手术量对医院排名的影响。

The impact of surgical volume on hospital ranking using the standardized infection ratio.

机构信息

Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.

Biostatistics Shared Resource, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, 97201, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 May 10;13(1):7624. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33937-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-33937-y
PMID:37165033
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10172297/
Abstract

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services require hospitals to report on quality metrics which are used to financially penalize those that perform in the lowest quartile. Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a critical component of the quality metrics that target healthcare-associated infections. However, the accuracy of such hospital profiling is highly affected by small surgical volumes which lead to a large amount of uncertainty in estimating standardized hospital-specific infection rates. Currently, hospitals with less than one expected SSI are excluded from rankings, but the effectiveness of this exclusion criterion is unknown. Tools that can quantify the classification accuracy and can determine the minimal surgical volume required for a desired level of accuracy are lacking. We investigate the effect of surgical volume on the accuracy of identifying poorly performing hospitals based on the standardized infection ratio and develop simulation-based algorithms for quantifying the classification accuracy. We apply our proposed method to data from HCA Healthcare (2014-2016) on SSIs in colon surgery patients. We estimate that for a procedure like colon surgery with an overall SSI rate of 3%, to rank hospitals in the HCA colon SSI dataset, hospitals that perform less than 200 procedures have a greater than 10% chance of being incorrectly assigned to the worst performing quartile. Minimum surgical volumes and predicted events criteria are required to make evaluating hospitals reliable, and these criteria vary by overall prevalence and between-hospital variability.

摘要

医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心要求医院报告质量指标,这些指标用于对表现最差的医院进行经济处罚。手术部位感染(SSI)是针对与医疗保健相关感染的质量指标的关键组成部分。然而,这种医院概况的准确性受到小手术量的严重影响,这导致在估计标准化医院特定感染率时存在大量不确定性。目前,手术量低于预期的 SSI 的医院被排除在排名之外,但这种排除标准的效果尚不清楚。缺乏可以量化分类准确性并确定达到所需准确性水平所需的最小手术量的工具。我们研究了手术量对基于标准化感染比识别表现不佳医院的准确性的影响,并开发了基于模拟的算法来量化分类准确性。我们将我们的方法应用于 HCA Healthcare(2014-2016 年)的结肠手术患者 SSI 数据。我们估计,对于像结肠手术这样的手术,总体 SSI 率为 3%,为了对 HCA 结肠 SSI 数据集进行医院排名,手术量少于 200 例的医院有超过 10%的机会被错误地分配到表现最差的四分之一。需要最小手术量和预测事件标准来使医院评估可靠,这些标准因总体流行率和医院间变异性而异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d0b/10172297/e747baa8d25e/41598_2023_33937_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d0b/10172297/eec6eb913bfc/41598_2023_33937_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d0b/10172297/43ee16299e51/41598_2023_33937_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d0b/10172297/aaddb215d36f/41598_2023_33937_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d0b/10172297/31054f7ef38a/41598_2023_33937_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d0b/10172297/c5fc7af5bac9/41598_2023_33937_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d0b/10172297/03369ec17c76/41598_2023_33937_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d0b/10172297/7f604e7b36a2/41598_2023_33937_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d0b/10172297/e747baa8d25e/41598_2023_33937_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d0b/10172297/eec6eb913bfc/41598_2023_33937_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d0b/10172297/43ee16299e51/41598_2023_33937_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d0b/10172297/aaddb215d36f/41598_2023_33937_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d0b/10172297/31054f7ef38a/41598_2023_33937_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d0b/10172297/c5fc7af5bac9/41598_2023_33937_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d0b/10172297/03369ec17c76/41598_2023_33937_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d0b/10172297/7f604e7b36a2/41598_2023_33937_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d0b/10172297/e747baa8d25e/41598_2023_33937_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of surgical volume on hospital ranking using the standardized infection ratio.利用标准化感染比评估手术量对医院排名的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 10;13(1):7624. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33937-y.
2
The Limited Utility of Ranking Hospitals Based on Their Colon Surgery Infection Rates.基于结肠手术感染率对医院进行排名的效用有限。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 23;72(1):90-98. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa012.
3
Ranking Hospitals Based on Colon Surgery and Abdominal Hysterectomy Surgical Site Infection Outcomes: Impact of Limiting Surveillance to the Operative Hospital.基于结肠手术和腹部子宫切除术手术部位感染结果对医院进行排名:将监测限制在手术医院的影响。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Sep 14;67(7):1096-1102. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy223.
4
Surgical site infection following hysterectomy: adjusted rankings in a regional collaborative.子宫切除术术后手术部位感染:区域性协作中的调整排名。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb;214(2):259.e1-259.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.002. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
5
National validation of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services strategy for identifying potential surgical-site infections following colon surgery and abdominal hysterectomy.美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services)旨在识别结肠手术和腹式子宫切除术术后潜在手术部位感染的策略的全国验证。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Feb;45(2):167-173. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.193. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
6
Medicare claims can be used to identify US hospitals with higher rates of surgical site infection following vascular surgery.医疗保险索赔可用于识别血管手术后手术部位感染率较高的美国医院。
Med Care. 2014 Oct;52(10):918-25. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000212.
7
Surgical Site Infections: Volume-Outcome Relationship and Year-to-Year Stability of Performance Rankings.手术部位感染:容量 - 结果关系及绩效排名的逐年稳定性
Med Care. 2017 Jan;55(1):79-85. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000620.
8
Risk Adjustment for Determining Surgical Site Infection in Colon Surgery: Are All Models Created Equal?结肠手术中确定手术部位感染的风险调整:所有模型都一样吗?
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016 Apr;17(2):173-8. doi: 10.1089/sur.2015.154. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
9
Electronically Available Comorbidities Should Be Used in Surgical Site Infection Risk Adjustment.电子病历中的合并症数据应被用于手术部位感染风险调整。
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Sep 1;65(5):803-810. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix431.
10
Use of Medicare claims to rank hospitals by surgical site infection risk following coronary artery bypass graft surgery.利用医疗保险索赔数据对冠状动脉旁路移植术后手术部位感染风险进行医院排名。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Aug;32(8):775-83. doi: 10.1086/660874.

引用本文的文献

1
Variable selection in modelling clustered data via within-cluster resampling.通过聚类内重采样对聚类数据进行建模时的变量选择。
Can J Stat. 2025 Mar;53(1). doi: 10.1002/cjs.11824. Epub 2024 Aug 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Combined laparoscopic and open colon surgery rankings fail to accurately rank hospitals by surgical-site infection rate.腹腔镜联合开腹结肠手术排名未能准确按手术部位感染率对医院进行排名。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Apr;44(4):624-630. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.153. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
2
The Limited Utility of Ranking Hospitals Based on Their Colon Surgery Infection Rates.基于结肠手术感染率对医院进行排名的效用有限。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 23;72(1):90-98. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa012.
3
Ranking hospital performance based on individual indicators: can we increase reliability by creating composite indicators?
基于个体指标对医院绩效进行排名:通过创建综合指标,我们能否提高可靠性?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jun 26;19(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0769-x.
4
Comparison of hospital surgical site infection rates and rankings using claims versus National Healthcare Safety Network surveillance data.比较索赔数据和国家医疗保健安全网络监测数据的医院手术部位感染率和排名。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Feb;40(2):208-210. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.310. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
5
Identifying Poor-Performing Hospitals in the Medicare Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program: An Assessment of Reliability.在医疗保险医院获得性疾病减少计划中识别表现不佳的医院:可靠性评估
J Healthc Qual. 2018 Nov/Dec;40(6):377-383. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000128.
6
Hospital volume and mortality for 25 types of inpatient treatment in German hospitals: observational study using complete national data from 2009 to 2014.德国医院25种住院治疗的医院诊疗量与死亡率:利用2009年至2014年全国完整数据的观察性研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 6;7(9):e016184. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016184.
7
Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy: Basic Definitions.诊断准确性的测量:基本定义。
EJIFCC. 2009 Jan 20;19(4):203-11. eCollection 2009 Jan.
8
The Impact of Hospital Size on CMS Hospital Profiling.医院规模对医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)医院评估的影响
Med Care. 2016 Apr;54(4):373-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000476.
9
Hospital Characteristics Associated With Penalties in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program.与医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心医院获得性条件减少计划相关的医院特征。
JAMA. 2015 Jul 28;314(4):375-83. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8609.
10
The effect of hospital volume on mortality in patients admitted with severe sepsis.医院规模对严重脓毒症入院患者死亡率的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 29;9(9):e108754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108754. eCollection 2014.