Internal Medicine Residency Program, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2211359. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2211359.
Internal medicine (IM) residency programs select applicants based on several metrics. Factors predicting success during residency are unclear across studies. To identify whether specific applicant or resident factors are associated with IM resident performance using ACGME milestones. We tested for associations between applicant factors available prior to the start of IM residency and resident factors measured during IM residency training, and resident performance on ACGME milestones across three consecutive years of IM training between 2015-2020. Univariable and multivariable linear regression modeling was used to test associations. Eighty-nine categorical IM residents that completed 3 consecutive years of training were included. Median age was 28 years (IQR 27-29) and 59.6% were male. Mean ACGME milestone scores increased with each post-graduate year (PGY) from 3.36 (SD 0.19) for PGY-1, to 3.80 (SD 0.15) for PGY-2, to 4.14 (SD 0.15) for PGY-3. Univariable modeling suggested referral to the clinical competency committee (CCC) for professionalism concerns was negatively associated with resident performance during each PGY. No applicant or resident factors included in the final multivariable regression models (age at starting residency, USMLE Step scores, interview score, rank list position, ITE scores) were associated with ACGME milestone scores for PGY-1 and PGY-2. Referral to the CCC for professionalism was negatively associated with resident performance during PGY-3. Residency selection factors did not predict resident milestone evaluation scores. Referral to the CCC was associated with significantly worse resident evaluation scores, suggesting professionalism may correlate with clinical performance.
内科住院医师培训计划根据多项指标选拔申请人。在不同的研究中,预测住院医师期间成功的因素尚不清楚。为了使用 ACGME 里程碑来确定特定的申请人或住院医师因素是否与内科住院医师的表现相关,我们测试了在开始内科住院医师培训之前可用的申请人因素和内科住院医师培训期间测量的住院医师因素,以及在 2015 年至 2020 年的三个连续内科住院医师培训年中,住院医师在 ACGME 里程碑上的表现。使用单变量和多变量线性回归模型来测试关联。共纳入 89 名完成连续 3 年培训的分类内科住院医师。中位年龄为 28 岁(IQR 27-29),59.6%为男性。ACGME 里程碑得分随着毕业后年限的增加而增加,从 PGY-1 的 3.36(SD 0.19),到 PGY-2 的 3.80(SD 0.15),再到 PGY-3 的 4.14(SD 0.15)。单变量模型表明,因专业操守问题被推荐到临床能力委员会(CCC)的住院医师在每个 PGY 的表现均较差。最终多变量回归模型中纳入的年龄、美国医师执照考试成绩、面试成绩、排名位置、ITE 评分等申请人和住院医师因素均与 PGY-1 和 PGY-2 的 ACGME 里程碑评分无关。因专业操守问题被推荐到 CCC 与 PGY-3 期间住院医师的表现呈负相关。住院医师选拔因素不能预测住院医师里程碑评估分数。因专业操守问题被推荐到 CCC 与住院医师评估分数显著降低相关,这表明专业操守可能与临床表现相关。