Primate socio-ecology shapes the evolution of distinctive facial repertoires.

Primate facial musculature enables a wide variety of movements during bouts of communication, but how these movements contribute to signal construction and repertoire size is unclear. The suggests that morphological constraints shape the evolution of facial repertoires: species with higher facial mobility will produce larger and more complex repertoires. In contrast, the suggests that social needs shape the evolution of facial repertoires: as social complexity increases, so does communicative repertoire size. We tested these two hypotheses by comparing chimpanzees () and gibbons (family ), two distantly related apes who vary in their facial mobility and social organization. While gibbons have higher facial mobility than chimpanzees, chimpanzees live in more complex social groups than gibbons. We compared the morphology and complexity of facial repertoires for both apes using Facial Action Coding Systems designed for chimpanzees and gibbons. Our comparisons were made at the level of individual muscle movements (action units [AUs]) and the level of muscle movement combinations (AU combinations). Our results show that the chimpanzee facial signaling repertoire was larger and more complex than gibbons, consistent with the On average, chimpanzees produced AU combinations consisting of more morphologically distinct AUs than gibbons. Moreover, chimpanzees also produced more morphologically distinct AU combinations than gibbons, even when focusing exclusively on AUs present in both apes. Therefore, our results suggest that socio-ecological factors were more important than anatomical ones to the evolution of facial signaling repertoires in chimpanzees and gibbons. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).