Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, 4444 Forest Park Avenue, MSC 8502-66-1101, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA; Division of Rehabilitation Science, Dept. of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, MMC 388, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Division of Physical Therapy, Dept. of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, MMC 388, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Braz J Phys Ther. 2023 May-Jun;27(3):100505. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2023.100505. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
Recent evidence suggests that internal impingement, or rotator cuff tendon deformation against the glenoid, occurs during overhead motions and may therefore be a mechanism of pathology even in non-athletes. Clinically, knowing how movement impacts potential injury mechanisms would be useful to guide movement-based treatment strategies.
To compare the distance between the glenoid and rotator cuff footprint between two groups classified based on scapulothoracic upward rotation (UR) magnitude (i.e., low, high) at 90° humerothoracic elevation.
Shoulder kinematics were quantified during scapular plane abduction in 60 participants using single-plane fluoroscopy. Of these, 40 were subsequently classified as having high or low scapulothoracic UR based on the sample's distribution. The minimum distance between the glenoid and rotator cuff footprint was calculated along with the locations of closest proximity (i.e., proximity centers). Minimum distances and proximity center locations were compared between groups using 2-factor mixed-model ANOVAs. The prevalence of glenoid-to-footprint contact was also compared.
Glenoid-to-footprint distances consistently decreased as humerothoracic elevation angle increased, and the anterior aspect of the footprint was closest to the posterosuperior glenoid. Minimum distances were not significantly different between UR groups (p≥0.16). However, group differences existed in proximity center locations (p<0.01). Glenoid-to-footprint contact was identified in 75.0% of participants at an average (SD) of 133.6° (3.2°) humerothoracic elevation.
The results of this study suggest that decreased UR as classified and assessed in this study does not significantly impact glenoid-to-footprint distances but does alter the location of the contact, which occurred in most participants.
最近的证据表明,在过顶运动中,内部撞击或肩袖肌腱变形与肩胛盂相抵,这可能是即使在非运动员中也存在病理机制的原因。临床上,了解运动如何影响潜在的损伤机制将有助于指导基于运动的治疗策略。
比较两组在肩胸向上旋转(UR)幅度(即低、高)为 90°时,肩胛盂与肩袖止点之间的距离。
在 60 名参与者的肩胛骨平面外展期间,使用单平面荧光透视法对肩部运动进行了定量分析。其中,40 名参与者随后根据样本分布分为高或低肩胸 UR 组。沿最接近(即接近中心)的位置计算肩胛盂和肩袖止点之间的最小距离。使用双因素混合模型 ANOVA 比较组间最小距离和接近中心位置。还比较了盂肱关节到肩袖止点接触的发生率。
随着肩胸角度的增加,盂肱关节到肩袖止点的距离始终减小,而止点的前侧最接近肩胛盂的后上侧。UR 组之间的最小距离没有显著差异(p≥0.16)。然而,接近中心位置存在组间差异(p<0.01)。在平均(SD)133.6°(3.2°)肩胸角度时,75.0%的参与者存在盂肱关节到肩袖止点的接触。
本研究的结果表明,如本研究中分类和评估的那样,UR 的减少并没有显著影响盂肱关节到肩袖止点的距离,但会改变接触的位置,大多数参与者都存在这种接触。