Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Heliomare Research and Development, Heliomare, Wijkaan Zee, The Netherlands.
Phys Ther. 2023 Mar 3;103(3). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzad005.
Individuals after stroke are less active, experience more fatigue, and perform activities at a slower pace than peers with no impairments. These problems might be caused by an increased aerobic energy expenditure during daily tasks and a decreased aerobic capacity after stroke. The aim of this study was to quantify relative aerobic load (ie, the ratio between aerobic energy expenditure and aerobic capacity) during daily-life activities after stroke.
Seventy-nine individuals after stroke (14 in Functional Ambulation Category [FAC] 3, 25 in FAC 4, and 40 in FAC 5) and 22 peers matched for age, sex, and body mass index performed a maximal exercise test and 5 daily-life activities at a preferred pace for 5 minutes. Aerobic energy expenditure (mL O2/kg/min) and economy (mL O2/kg/unit of distance) were derived from oxygen uptake ($\dot{\mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{O}}_2$). Relative aerobic load was defined as aerobic energy expenditure divided by peak aerobic capacity (%$\dot{\mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{O}}_2$peak) and by $\dot{\mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{o}}_2$ at the ventilatory threshold (%$\dot{\mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{o}}_2$-VT) and compared in individuals after stroke and individuals with no impairments.
Individuals after stroke performed activities at a significantly higher relative aerobic load (39%-82% $\dot{\mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{o}}_2$peak) than peers with no impairments (38%-66% $\dot{\mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{o}}_2$peak), despite moving at a significantly slower pace. Aerobic capacity in individuals after stroke was significantly lower than that in peers with no impairments. Movement was less economical in individuals after stroke than in peers with no impairments.
Individuals after stroke experience a high relative aerobic load during cyclic daily-life activities, despite adopting a slower movement pace than peers with no impairments. Perhaps individuals after stroke limit their movement pace to operate at sustainable relative aerobic load levels at the expense of pace and economy.
Improving aerobic capacity through structured aerobic training in a rehabilitation program should be further investigated as a potential intervention to improve mobility and functioning after stroke.
与无损伤同龄人相比,中风后个体的活动量较少,更容易感到疲劳,活动速度也较慢。这些问题可能是由于日常任务中需消耗更多的有氧能量,以及中风后有氧能力下降所致。本研究旨在量化中风后日常生活活动中的相对有氧负荷(即,有氧能量消耗与有氧能力的比值)。
79 名中风患者(功能步行分类[FAC] 3 级 14 人、FAC 4 级 25 人、FAC 5 级 40 人)和 22 名年龄、性别和体重指数匹配的无损伤同龄人以自己喜欢的速度进行 5 分钟的最大运动测试和 5 项日常活动。从耗氧量($\dot{\mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{O}}_2$)中得出有氧能量消耗(mL·O2/kg/min)和经济性(mL·O2/kg/距离单位)。相对有氧负荷定义为有氧能量消耗除以峰值有氧能力(%$\dot{\mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{O}}_2$peak)和呼吸阈(%$\dot{\mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{o}}_2$-VT)时的$\dot{\mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{O}}_2$,并在中风患者和无损伤患者中进行比较。
与无损伤同龄人(38%-66% $\dot{\mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{o}}_2$peak)相比,中风患者进行日常活动时的相对有氧负荷明显更高(39%-82% $\dot{\mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{o}}_2$peak),尽管他们的运动速度明显较慢。中风患者的有氧能力明显低于无损伤同龄人。中风患者的运动经济性也低于无损伤同龄人。
尽管中风患者的运动速度比无损伤同龄人慢,但他们在进行日常循环活动时会经历较高的相对有氧负荷。也许中风患者为了保持可持续的相对有氧负荷水平,限制了自己的运动速度,牺牲了速度和经济性。
通过康复计划中的结构性有氧训练来提高有氧能力,应该作为改善中风后活动能力和功能的潜在干预措施进一步研究。