College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614, USA.
Center for Cardiovascular Risk Research, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 26;20(9):5649. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20095649.
This paper aims to estimate the prevalence of e-cigarette use before and after the COVID-19 pandemic declaration and to delineate disparities in use across subpopulations. Data were derived from the 2020 Health Information National Trends Survey ( = 3865) to conduct weighted multivariable logistic regression and marginal analyses. The overall prevalence of current e-cigarette use increased from 4.79% to 8.63% after the COVID-19 pandemic declaration. Furthermore, non-Hispanic Black people and Hispanic people had lower odds of current e-cigarette use than non-Hispanic White people, but no significant differences were observed between groups before the pandemic. Compared to heterosexual participants, sexual minority (SM) participants had higher odds of current e-cigarette use after the declaration, with insignificant differences before. People who had cardiovascular disease conditions, relative to those without, had higher odds of current e-cigarette use after the declaration, but no group differences were found before the declaration. The marginal analyses showed that before and after the pandemic declaration, SM individuals had a significantly higher probability of using e-cigarettes compared to heterosexual individuals. These findings suggest the importance of adopting a subpopulation approach to understand and develop initiatives to address substance use, such as e-cigarettes, during pandemics and other public health emergencies.
本文旨在估计 COVID-19 大流行宣布前后电子烟的使用情况,并描绘各亚人群之间使用电子烟的差异。数据来自 2020 年健康信息国家趋势调查(n = 3865),采用加权多变量逻辑回归和边际分析。COVID-19 大流行宣布后,当前电子烟使用的总体流行率从 4.79%上升至 8.63%。此外,非西班牙裔黑人(non-Hispanic Black people)和西班牙裔(Hispanic people)使用当前电子烟的几率低于非西班牙裔白人(non-Hispanic White people),但大流行前各群体之间没有显著差异。与异性恋参与者相比,性少数群体(sexual minority,SM)参与者在宣布后使用当前电子烟的几率更高,而在宣布前则没有显著差异。与没有心血管疾病的参与者相比,有心血管疾病的参与者在宣布后使用当前电子烟的几率更高,但在宣布前则没有发现各群体之间存在差异。边际分析显示,在大流行宣布前后,性少数群体(SM)个体使用电子烟的概率明显高于异性恋个体。这些发现表明,在大流行和其他公共卫生紧急情况下,采用亚人群方法来理解和制定解决物质使用(如电子烟)的倡议非常重要。