Di Spirito Federica, D'Ambrosio Francesco, Cannatà Davide, D'Antò Vincenzo, Giordano Francesco, Martina Stefano
Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Via S. Allende, 84081 Baronissi, Italy.
School of Orthodontics, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Oral Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 6;11(9):1340. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091340.
The present umbrella review of four systematic reviews with meta-analysis aimed to assess whether clear aligners are associated with better periodontal conditions compared with fixed appliances in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. The present study protocol was developed in accordance with the PRISMA statement before the literature search, data extraction, and analysis and was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023401808). The question formulation, search, and study selection strategies were developed according to the PICO model. Systematic reviews with a meta-analysis published in English without date restriction were electronically searched across the Cochrane Library, Web of Science (Core Collection), Scopus, EMBASE, and MEDLINE/PubMed databases until 10 February 2023. An assessment of study quality was performed using the AMSTAR 2 tool. Differences in the PI, GI, and BOP in the short- and medium-term follow-ups, in the PPD in long-term follow-up, and the gingival recessions in the short-term follow-up were found between subjects with clear aligners and fixed appliances, revealing a slight tendency for clear aligners to be associated with healthier periodontal conditions. However, even if statistically significant, such differences would be negligible in a clinical environment. Therefore, the impact of orthodontic treatment with clear aligners and fixed appliances on periodontal health status should be considered comparable.
本项对四项包含荟萃分析的系统评价进行的汇总分析旨在评估,在接受正畸治疗的患者中,与固定矫治器相比,透明矫治器是否与更好的牙周状况相关。本研究方案在文献检索、数据提取和分析之前根据PRISMA声明制定,并在PROSPERO(CRD42023401808)上进行了注册。问题制定、检索和研究选择策略根据PICO模型制定。在Cochrane图书馆、科学网(核心合集)、Scopus、EMBASE和MEDLINE/PubMed数据库中对截至2023年2月10日发表的无日期限制的英文荟萃分析系统评价进行电子检索。使用AMSTAR 2工具对研究质量进行评估。在短期和中期随访中,透明矫治器组与固定矫治器组在菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)和探诊出血(BOP)方面存在差异,在长期随访中牙周探诊深度(PPD)存在差异,在短期随访中牙龈退缩存在差异,表明透明矫治器组有与更健康的牙周状况相关的轻微趋势。然而,即使具有统计学意义,这种差异在临床环境中也可忽略不计。因此,应认为透明矫治器和固定矫治器正畸治疗对牙周健康状况的影响相当。