Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington-Harborview Center for Prehospital Emergency Care, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2023 Oct;82(4):509-516. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.04.009. Epub 2023 May 13.
Little is known about COVID-19 booster vaccine hesitancy. We sought to determine the uptake of booster vaccines, as well as the prevalence of and reasons for booster hesitancy in emergency department (ED) patients.
We performed a cross-sectional survey study of adult patients at 5 safety-net hospital EDs in 4 US cities from mid-January to mid-July 2022. Participants were fluent in English or Spanish and had received at least one COVID-19 vaccine. We assessed the following parameters: (1) the prevalence of nonboosted status and reasons for not getting a booster; (2) the prevalence of booster vaccine hesitancy and reasons for hesitancy; and (3) the association of hesitancy with demographic variables.
Of 802 participants, 373 (47%) were women, 478 (60%) were non-White, 182 (23%) lacked primary care, 110 (14%) primarily spoke Spanish, and 370 (46%) were publicly insured. Of the 771 participants who completed their primary series, 316 (41%) had not received a booster vaccine; the primary reason for nonreceipt was lack of opportunity (38%). Of the nonboosted participants, 179 (57%) expressed hesitancy, citing need for more information (25%), concerns about side effects (24%), and the belief that a booster was unnecessary after the initial series (20%). In the multivariable analysis, Asian participants were less likely to be booster hesitant than White participants (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05 to 0.93), non-English-speaking participants were more likely to be booster hesitant than English-speaking participants (aOR 2.35, 95% CI 1.49 to 3.71), and Republican participants were more likely to be booster hesitant than Democrat participants (aOR 6.07, 95% CI 4.21 to 8.75).
Of almost half of this urban ED population who had not received a COVID-19 booster vaccine, more than one third stated that lack of opportunity to receive one was the primary reason. Furthermore, more than half of the nonboosted participants were booster hesitant, with many expressing concerns or a desire for more information that may be addressed with booster vaccine education.
关于 COVID-19 加强疫苗犹豫的信息较少。我们旨在确定加强疫苗的接种率,以及急诊科 (ED) 患者加强疫苗犹豫的流行率和原因。
我们对 2022 年 1 月中旬至 7 月中旬期间来自美国 4 个城市的 5 家安全网医院 ED 的 802 名成年患者进行了横断面调查研究。参与者精通英语或西班牙语,且至少接种过一剂 COVID-19 疫苗。我们评估了以下参数:(1)未接受加强针的比例和未接种的原因;(2)加强疫苗犹豫的比例和原因;(3)犹豫与人口统计学变量的关联。
在 802 名参与者中,373 名(47%)为女性,478 名(60%)为非白人,182 名(23%)缺乏初级保健,110 名(14%)主要讲西班牙语,370 名(46%)为公共保险。在完成基础疫苗接种的 771 名参与者中,316 名(41%)未接种加强疫苗;未接种的主要原因是缺乏机会(38%)。在未接种加强针的参与者中,179 名(57%)表示犹豫,原因包括需要更多信息(25%)、担心副作用(24%)以及认为初始系列后不需要加强针(20%)。在多变量分析中,与白人参与者相比,亚洲参与者不太可能犹豫接种加强针(调整后的优势比[OR] 0.21,95%置信区间[CI] 0.05 至 0.93),非英语参与者比英语参与者更有可能犹豫接种加强针(OR 2.35,95%CI 1.49 至 3.71),共和党参与者比民主党参与者更有可能犹豫接种加强针(OR 6.07,95%CI 4.21 至 8.75)。
在该城市 ED 人群中,近一半未接种 COVID-19 加强疫苗的人群中,超过三分之一的人表示缺乏接种机会是主要原因。此外,超过一半的未接种加强针的参与者表示犹豫,其中许多人表示担忧或希望获得更多信息,这可能可以通过加强疫苗教育来解决。