Tietjen Ruth Rebecca
Department of Philosophy, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5037 AB Tilburg, The Netherlands.
J Ethics. 2023;27(2):211-230. doi: 10.1007/s10892-023-09418-9. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
In this article, I provide a philosophical analysis of the nature and role of perceived identity threats in the genesis and maintenance of fanaticism. First, I offer a preliminary definition of fanaticism as the social identity-defining devotion to a sacred value that demands universal recognition and is complemented by a hostile antagonism toward people who dissent from one's group's values. The fanatic's hostility toward dissent thereby takes the threefold form of outgroup hostility, ingroup hostility, and self-hostility. Second, I provide a detailed analysis of the fears of fanaticism, arguing that each of the three aforementioned forms of hostile antagonism corresponds to one form of fear or anxiety: the fanatic's fear of the outgroup, renegade members of the ingroup, and problematic aspects of themselves. In each of these three forms of fear, the fanatic experiences both their sacred values and their individual and social identity as being threatened. Finally, I turn to a fourth form of fear or anxiety connected to fanaticism, namely the fanatic's anxiety of and flight from the existential condition of uncertainty itself, which, at least in some cases, ground the fanatic's fearfulness.
在本文中,我对感知到的身份威胁在狂热主义的产生和维持过程中的本质及作用进行了哲学分析。首先,我对狂热主义给出了一个初步定义,即对一种神圣价值的社会身份界定性的奉献,这种价值要求得到普遍认可,并伴随着对与自己群体价值观不同意见者的敌对态度。因此,狂热者对异见的敌意呈现出三种形式:对外群体的敌意、对内群体叛徒的敌意以及对自身的敌意。其次,我对狂热主义的恐惧进行了详细分析,认为上述三种敌对形式分别对应一种恐惧或焦虑形式:狂热者对外群体的恐惧、对内群体叛离成员的恐惧以及对自身问题方面的恐惧。在这三种恐惧形式中,狂热者都感到他们的神圣价值以及他们的个人和社会身份受到了威胁。最后,我转向与狂热主义相关的第四种恐惧或焦虑形式,即狂热者对不确定性本身的生存状况的焦虑和逃避,至少在某些情况下,这种焦虑是狂热者恐惧的根源。