Deshpande Radhika, Patel Raj, Regmi Manjari R, Salih Mohsin, Kropp Robert, Al-Bast Basma, Sheikh Muhammad A, Sagalov Andrew, Kulkarni Abhishek, Siddique Momin, Hegde Shruti, Bhattarai Mukul
Department of Internal Medicine, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
Division of Cardiology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, USA.
Cardiovasc Endocrinol Metab. 2023 May 8;12(2):e0284. doi: 10.1097/XCE.0000000000000284. eCollection 2023 Jun.
Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2-Is) have emerged as standard therapy for heart failure. We aim to assess the safety of SGLT2-Is in patients with a high risk of cardiovascular disease.
An electronic database search was conducted for randomized control trials comparing SGLT2-Is to placebo in patients with a high risk of cardiac disease or heart failure. Data were pooled for outcomes using random-effect models. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to compare eight safety outcomes between the two groups. The analysis included ten studies with 71 553 participants, among whom 39 053 received SGLT2-Is; 28 809 were male and 15 655 were female (mean age, 65.2 years). The mean follow-up period was 2.3 years with the range being 0.8-4.2 years. The SGLT2-Is group had a significant reduction in AKI (OR = 0.8;95% CI 0.74-0.90) and serious adverse effects (OR = 0.9; 95% CI 0.83-0.96) as compared to placebo. No difference was found in fracture (OR = 1.1; 95% CI 0.91-1.24), amputation (OR = 1.1; 95% CI 1.00-1.29), hypoglycemia (OR 0.98;95% CI 0.83-1.15), and UTI (OR = 1.1; 95% CI 1.00-1.22). In contrast, DKA (OR = 2.4; 95% CI 1.65-3.60) and volume depletion (OR = 1.2; 95% CI 1.07-1.41) were higher in SGLT2-Is group.
EXPERT OPINION/COMMENTARY: The benefits of SLGT2-Is outweigh the risk of adverse events. They may reduce the risk of AKI but are associated with an increased risk of DKA and volume depletion. Further studies are warranted to monitor a wider range of safety outcomes of SGLT2-Is.
钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2-Is)已成为心力衰竭的标准治疗方法。我们旨在评估SGLT2-Is在心血管疾病高危患者中的安全性。
对比较SGLT2-Is与安慰剂在心脏病或心力衰竭高危患者中的随机对照试验进行了电子数据库检索。使用随机效应模型汇总数据以得出结果。两组之间的八个安全结果采用比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)进行比较。该分析纳入了10项研究,共71553名参与者,其中39053人接受了SGLT2-Is治疗;男性28809人,女性15655人(平均年龄65.2岁)。平均随访期为2.3年,范围为0.8 - 4.2年。与安慰剂相比,SGLT2-Is组急性肾损伤(OR = 0.8;95% CI 0.74 - 0.90)和严重不良反应(OR = 0.9;95% CI 0.83 - 0.96)显著降低。在骨折(OR = 1.1;95% CI 0.91 - 1.24)、截肢(OR = 1.1;95% CI 1.00 - 1.29)、低血糖(OR 0.98;95% CI 0.83 - 1.15)和尿路感染(OR = 1.1;95% CI 1.00 - 1.22)方面未发现差异。相比之下,SGLT2-Is组糖尿病酮症酸中毒(OR = 2.4;95% CI 1.65 - 3.60)和容量耗竭(OR = 1.2;95% CI 1.07 - 1.41)更高。
专家意见/评论:SGLT2-Is的益处超过不良事件风险。它们可能降低急性肾损伤风险,但与糖尿病酮症酸中毒和容量耗竭风险增加有关。有必要进行进一步研究以监测SGLT2-Is更广泛的安全结果。