Woollard Laurence, Gorman Richard, Rosenfelt Dakota J
On The Pulse Consultancy, Ltd., 14 Church View, Wixoe, Sudbury, CO10 8UH, UK.
Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
Ther Adv Rare Dis. 2021 Sep 26;2:26330040211047244. doi: 10.1177/26330040211047244. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
Adeno-associated virus-based gene therapy points to a coming transformation in the treatment of people living with haemophilia, promising sustained bleed control and potential improvement in quality of life. Nevertheless, the consequences of introducing new genetic material are not trivial. The perceived benefits should not minimise the challenges facing patients in understanding the long-term risks and providing a valid and meaningful informed consent, whether in a research or clinical setting. Informed consent is a fundamentally important doctrine in both medical ethics and health law, upholding an individual's right to define their personal goals and make their own autonomous choices. Patients should be enabled to recognise their clinical situation, understand the implications of treatment and integrate every facet of their life into their decision. This review describes informed consent processes for haemophilia gene therapy clinical trials, factors affecting patients' decision making and the availability of patient-centred decision support interventions, to ensure that patients' interests are being protected. Regulatory guidance has been published for physicians and manufacturers in haemophilia on informed consent, including for gene therapy, while best-practice recommendations for patient-physician discussions are available. In all settings, however, communicating and presenting highly technical and complex therapeutic information is challenging, especially where multiple barriers to scientific knowledge and health literacy exist. We propose several evidence-informed strategies to enhance the consent procedure, such as utilising validated literacy and knowledge assessment tools as well as participatory learning environments over an extended period, to ensure that patients are fully cognisant of the consent they give or deny. Further research is needed to define new, creative approaches for patient education and the upholding of ethical values in the informed consent process for gene therapy. The lessons learnt and approaches developed within haemophilia could set the gold standard for good practice in ensuring ethical preparedness amidst advances in genetic therapies.
Gene therapy is the process of replacing faulty genes with healthy ones. In haemophilia, gene therapy involves introducing a working copy of the gene for the clotting factor that patients are missing. Following treatment, patients should begin producing their own clotting factor normally. However, people living with haemophilia (PwH) need to be fully informed regarding the potential benefits and risks of gene therapy and what this means for them, whether as part of a research study or routine medical care.Patients must be respected and supported to make decisions about their own health and wellbeing, recognising their legal and moral right to set personal goals and make treatment choices. For this to happen in practice, patients should be aware of their individual health needs, understand the effects of treatment and consider lifestyle preferences in relation to their decisions. This article attempts to describe how informed consent is obtained in haemophilia gene therapy clinical trials, what affects a patient's ability to make decisions and the availability of information and support to respect and protect the interests of PwH.Regulators responsible for approving medical products have published guidance on informed consent for physicians and pharmaceutical manufacturers in haemophilia, including for gene therapy. Recommendations have been made about the best ways for PwH to discuss gene therapy with their physicians. Yet, poor communication of complex topics, such as gene therapy, can be problematic, especially if patients lack the skills and confidence to understand and discuss the science, or for physicians with limited time in clinic.We propose strategies to improve the consent process, so patients can feel more able to make informed decisions about new treatments. Further research is needed to find new, creative approaches for educating patients and ensuring that the informed consent process for gene therapy in haemophilia is ethical.
基于腺相关病毒的基因疗法预示着血友病治疗即将发生变革,有望实现持续的出血控制并可能改善生活质量。然而,引入新的遗传物质所带来的后果并非微不足道。无论是在研究还是临床环境中,所感知到的益处都不应忽视患者在理解长期风险以及提供有效且有意义的知情同意方面所面临的挑战。知情同意在医学伦理和健康法律中都是一项至关重要的原则,它维护着个人定义自身个人目标并做出自主选择的权利。患者应能够认识到自己的临床状况,理解治疗的影响,并将生活的方方面面纳入其决策过程。本综述描述了血友病基因治疗临床试验的知情同意过程、影响患者决策的因素以及以患者为中心的决策支持干预措施的可用性,以确保患者的利益得到保护。针对血友病领域的医生和制造商,已发布了关于知情同意的监管指南,包括基因治疗方面的指南,同时也有针对医患讨论的最佳实践建议。然而,在所有环境中,传达和呈现高度技术化和复杂的治疗信息都具有挑战性,尤其是在存在科学知识和健康素养的多重障碍的情况下。我们提出了几种基于证据的策略来加强同意程序,例如使用经过验证的素养和知识评估工具以及在较长时间内营造参与式学习环境,以确保患者充分认识到他们给予或拒绝的同意。需要进一步研究来确定在基因治疗的知情同意过程中进行患者教育和维护伦理价值的新的、创造性方法。在血友病领域所吸取的经验教训和开发的方法可为在基因治疗进展中确保伦理准备的良好实践设定黄金标准。
基因治疗是用健康基因替换有缺陷基因的过程。在血友病中,基因治疗涉及引入患者所缺失的凝血因子基因的一个有效副本。治疗后,患者应开始正常产生自身的凝血因子。然而,血友病患者(PwH)需要充分了解基因治疗的潜在益处和风险以及这对他们意味着什么,无论是作为研究项目还是常规医疗护理的一部分。患者必须得到尊重和支持,以便就自身的健康和福祉做出决策,认识到他们设定个人目标和做出治疗选择的法律和道德权利。为了在实际中实现这一点,患者应了解自己的个体健康需求,理解治疗的效果,并在决策时考虑生活方式偏好。本文试图描述在血友病基因治疗临床试验中如何获得知情同意、什么会影响患者的决策能力以及为尊重和保护血友病患者的利益而提供的信息和支持的可用性。负责批准医疗产品的监管机构已发布了针对血友病领域医生和制药制造商的知情同意指南,包括基因治疗方面的指南。已经就血友病患者与医生讨论基因治疗的最佳方式提出了建议。然而,复杂主题(如基因治疗)的沟通不畅可能会成问题,特别是如果患者缺乏理解和讨论科学的技能和信心,或者对于在诊所时间有限的医生来说也是如此。我们提出了改进同意程序的策略,以便患者能够更有能力就新治疗做出明智的决策。需要进一步研究以找到新的、创造性的方法来教育患者并确保血友病基因治疗的知情同意过程符合伦理。