• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于颅内动脉瘤治疗的血流导向密网支架置入术后支架内狭窄的发生率及预测因素

The incidence and predictors of in-stent stenosis after pipeline flow-diverter stenting for intracranial aneurysm treatment.

作者信息

You Wei, Lv Jian, Li Zifan, Chen Xiheng, Deng Dingwei, Tang Yudi, Li Youxiang, Sun Yong, Jiang Yuhua

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, United States.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2023 Apr 25;14:1140497. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1140497. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2023.1140497
PMID:37181557
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10166875/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Data on in-stent stenosis (ISS) following the flow diverter (FD) implantation method are scarce and inconsistent. In the present study, we sought to determine the incidence of ISS and identify the factors that predict its severity via the use of ordinal logistic regression.

METHODS

A retrospective review of our center's electronic database was conducted to identify all patients with intracranial aneurysms (IAs) who received pipeline embolization device (PED) implantation between 2016 and 2020. Patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, procedural information, and clinical and angiographic outcomes were reviewed. ISS was quantitatively assessed on angiographic follow-ups and graded as mild (<25%), moderate (25-50%), or severe (>50%). Ordinal logistic regression was conducted to determine the predictors of stenosis severity.

RESULTS

A total of 240 patients with 252 aneurysms treated in 252 procedures were enrolled in this study. ISS has been detected in 135 (53.6%) lesions, with a mean follow-up time of 6.53 ± 3.26 months. The ISS was mild in 66 (48.9%) cases, moderate in 52 (38.5%) cases, and severe in 17 (12.6%) cases. All patients were asymptomatic, except for two of them with severe stenosis who presented with symptoms of acute cerebral thrombosis. Ordinal logistic regression identified that younger age and a longer procedure duration were independent predictors of a higher likelihood of ISS.

CONCLUSION

ISS is a common angiographic finding after PED implantation for IAs and is presented as a largely benign course through long-term follow-up. Patients who were younger in age and had a longer procedure duration were found to be at a greater risk of developing ISS.

摘要

背景与目的

关于血流导向装置(FD)植入术后支架内狭窄(ISS)的数据稀缺且不一致。在本研究中,我们试图通过使用有序逻辑回归来确定ISS的发生率,并识别预测其严重程度的因素。

方法

对本中心的电子数据库进行回顾性分析,以确定2016年至2020年间接受Pipeline栓塞装置(PED)植入的所有颅内动脉瘤(IA)患者。回顾患者的人口统计学资料、动脉瘤特征、手术信息以及临床和血管造影结果。在血管造影随访中对ISS进行定量评估,并分为轻度(<25%)、中度(25%-50%)或重度(>50%)。进行有序逻辑回归以确定狭窄严重程度的预测因素。

结果

本研究共纳入252例接受252次手术治疗的240例患者。在135个(53.6%)病变中检测到ISS,平均随访时间为6.53±3.26个月。66例(48.9%)为轻度ISS,52例(38.5%)为中度ISS,17例(12.6%)为重度ISS。所有患者均无症状,除了2例重度狭窄患者出现急性脑血栓形成症状。有序逻辑回归确定年龄较小和手术时间较长是ISS可能性较高的独立预测因素。

结论

ISS是IA患者接受PED植入术后常见的血管造影表现,通过长期随访显示其病程大多为良性。发现年龄较小和手术时间较长的患者发生ISS的风险更大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed7/10166875/d2c27d07e7df/fneur-14-1140497-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed7/10166875/5843f4e4e0cf/fneur-14-1140497-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed7/10166875/d2c27d07e7df/fneur-14-1140497-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed7/10166875/5843f4e4e0cf/fneur-14-1140497-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ed7/10166875/d2c27d07e7df/fneur-14-1140497-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
The incidence and predictors of in-stent stenosis after pipeline flow-diverter stenting for intracranial aneurysm treatment.用于颅内动脉瘤治疗的血流导向密网支架置入术后支架内狭窄的发生率及预测因素
Front Neurol. 2023 Apr 25;14:1140497. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1140497. eCollection 2023.
2
Long-term outcomes and dynamic changes of in-stent stenosis after Pipeline embolization device treatment of intracranial aneurysms.颅内动脉瘤Pipeline 栓塞装置治疗后支架内狭窄的长期结果和动态变化。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Dec;15(12):1187-1193. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019680. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
3
Transient in-stent stenosis at mid-term angiographic follow-up in patients treated with SILK flow diverter stents: incidence, clinical significance and long-term follow-up.SILK 血流导向密网支架治疗患者中期血管造影随访时的支架内中期狭窄:发生率、临床意义和长期随访。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Feb;11(2):166-170. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-013928. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
4
Tortuosity of parent artery predicts in-stent stenosis after pipeline flow-diverter stenting for internal carotid artery aneurysms.颈内动脉动脉瘤行血流导向密网支架置入术后,载瘤动脉迂曲可预测支架内狭窄。
Front Neurol. 2022 Oct 12;13:1034402. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1034402. eCollection 2022.
5
In-Stent Stenosis After Pipeline Embolization Device in Intracranial Aneurysms: Incidence, Predictors, and Clinical Outcomes.颅内动脉瘤Pipeline 栓塞装置后支架内狭窄:发生率、预测因素和临床结局。
Neurosurgery. 2022 Dec 1;91(6):943-951. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002142. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
6
Long-term Follow-up of In-stent Stenosis After Pipeline Flow Diversion Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms.颅内动脉瘤血管内血流导向装置治疗后支架内狭窄的长期随访
Neurosurgery. 2016 Jun;78(6):862-7. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001146.
7
Bifurcated Aneurysm Location Predicts In-Stent Stenosis After Neuroform-EZ Stent-Assisted Coiling for Intracranial Aneurysm.分叉型动脉瘤位置可预测Neuroform-EZ支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞颅内动脉瘤后支架内狭窄情况。
Front Neurol. 2022 May 13;13:873014. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.873014. eCollection 2022.
8
In-stent Stenosis after p64 Flow Diverter Treatment.支架内狭窄(p64 血流导向装置治疗后)。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2018 Dec;28(4):563-568. doi: 10.1007/s00062-017-0591-y. Epub 2017 May 9.
9
Quantitative Assessment of In-Stent Stenosis After Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single-Institution Series and Systematic Review.Pipeline栓塞装置治疗颅内动脉瘤后支架内狭窄的定量评估:单机构系列研究与系统评价
World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;120:e1031-e1040. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.225. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
10
Long Term Outcome of In-Stent Stenosis after Stent Assisted Coil Embolization for Cerebral Aneurysm.支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗脑动脉瘤后支架内狭窄的长期预后
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2019 Sep;62(5):536-544. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2019.0087. Epub 2019 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultra-high-resolution imaging of intracranial flow diverters with photon counting CT: A comparative phantom study with flat-panel CT.利用光子计数CT对颅内血流分流器进行超高分辨率成像:与平板CT的对比体模研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 21;15(1):26498. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12713-0.
2
Changes in preoperative and postoperative blood flow parameters are closely associated with in-stent stenosis after flow diverter treatment in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a retrospective cohort study.未破裂颅内动脉瘤血流导向治疗后术前和术后血流参数的变化与支架内狭窄密切相关:一项回顾性队列研究。
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Jun 2;48(1):473. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03569-z.
3
Subacute Stent Deformities as an Underlying Reason for Vessel Stenosis after Flow Diversion with the p64 Stent: Review and Discussion of Biologic Mechanisms and Consequences.
亚急性支架畸形作为使用p64支架血流导向术后血管狭窄的潜在原因:生物学机制及后果的综述与讨论
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2025 Apr 2;46(4):712-719. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8564.
4
An increase in flow-diverter oversizing values as an independent risk factor for developing more severe in-stent stenosis. A retrospective single-center study based on flow diversion of supraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysms.分流器尺寸过大值增加是发生更严重支架内狭窄的独立危险因素。一项基于床突上段颈内动脉动脉瘤血流分流的回顾性单中心研究。
Front Neurol. 2025 Jan 8;15:1499732. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1499732. eCollection 2024.
5
The significance of stent sizing for parent vessel stenosis after flow diversion of MCA bifurcation aneurysms.大脑中动脉分叉部动脉瘤血流导向术后母血管狭窄的支架尺寸选择的意义
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Sep 27:15910199241285503. doi: 10.1177/15910199241285503.
6
Long-term Safety and Efficacy of the Derivo Embolization Device in a Single-center Series.单中心系列研究中 Derivo 栓塞装置的长期安全性和疗效。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2024 Dec;34(4):789-798. doi: 10.1007/s00062-024-01423-1. Epub 2024 May 30.
7
Comprehensive Analysis of Post-Pipeline Endothelialization and Remodeling.综合分析管道内皮化和重塑。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024 Jul 8;45(7):893-898. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8228.
8
Safety and efficacy profile of off-label use of the Pipeline Embolization Device: A systematic review and meta-analysis.管道栓塞装置超说明书使用的安全性和有效性概况:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024 Apr;33(4):107586. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107586. Epub 2024 Jan 17.