• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机动车拥有情况与心肌梗死后死亡率差异之间的关联。

Association between vehicle ownership and disparities in mortality after myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Goitia Jesse J, Onwuzurike James, Chen Aiyu, Wu Yi-Lin, Shen Albert Yuh-Jer, Lee Ming-Sum

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, University of California, Irvine.

Department of Cardiology, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Prev Cardiol. 2023 Apr 25;14:100500. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2023.100500. eCollection 2023 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajpc.2023.100500
PMID:37181802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10173400/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Access to reliable transportation is fundamental in the management of chronic disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between vehicle ownership at the neighborhood-level and long-term mortality after myocardial infarction (MI).

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study evaluating adult patients admitted for MI between January 1st, 2006, and December 31st, 2016. Neighborhoods were defined by census tract and household vehicle ownership data was obtained from the American Community Survey courtesy of the University of California, Los Angeles Center for Neighborhood Knowledge. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those living in neighborhoods with higher vehicle ownership, and those living in neighborhoods with lower vehicle ownership. The cutoff of 4.34% of households reporting not owning a vehicle was used to define a neighborhood as one with "higher" vs "lower" vehicle ownership as this was the median value for the cohort. The association between vehicle ownership and all-cause mortality after MI was assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 30,126 patients were included (age 68.1 +/- 13.5 years, 63.2% male). After adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and medical comorbidities, lower vehicle ownership was associated with increased all-cause mortality after MI (hazard ratio [HR] 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.14; <0.001). This finding remained significant after adjusting for median household income (HR 1.06; 95% CI 1.02-1.10;  = 0.007). Upon comparison of White and Black patients living in neighborhoods with lower vehicle ownership; Black patients were found to have an increased all-cause mortality after MI (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.13-1.30, <0.001), a difference which remained significant after adjusting for income (HR 1.20; 95% CI 1.12-1.29; <0.001). There was no significant difference in mortality between White and Black patients living in neighborhoods with higher vehicle ownership.

CONCLUSION

Lower vehicle ownership was associated with increased mortality after MI. Black patients living in neighborhoods with lower vehicle ownership had a higher mortality after MI than White patients living in similar neighborhoods but Black patients living in neighborhoods with higher vehicle ownership had no worse mortality than their White counterparts. This study highlights the importance of transportation in determining health status after MI.

摘要

背景

获得可靠的交通方式是慢性病管理的基础。本研究的目的是调查社区层面的车辆拥有情况与心肌梗死(MI)后长期死亡率之间的关联。

方法

这是一项回顾性观察研究,评估了2006年1月1日至2016年12月31日期间因MI入院的成年患者。社区由普查区定义,家庭车辆拥有数据由加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校邻里知识中心提供的美国社区调查获得。患者分为两组:居住在车辆拥有率较高社区的患者和居住在车辆拥有率较低社区的患者。以报告无车辆的家庭比例4.34%作为 cutoff,将社区定义为“较高”与“较低”车辆拥有率的社区,因为这是该队列的中位数。使用Cox比例风险回归模型评估MI后车辆拥有情况与全因死亡率之间的关联。

结果

共纳入30126例患者(年龄68.1±13.5岁,63.2%为男性)。在调整年龄、性别、种族/民族和合并症后,较低的车辆拥有率与MI后全因死亡率增加相关(风险比[HR]1.10;95%置信区间[CI]1.06 - 1.14;P<0.001)。在调整家庭收入中位数后,这一发现仍然显著(HR 1.06;95% CI 1.02 - 1.10;P = 0.007)。在比较居住在车辆拥有率较低社区的白人和黑人患者时;发现黑人患者MI后的全因死亡率增加(HR 1.21,95% CI 1.13 - 1.30,P<0.001),在调整收入后这一差异仍然显著(HR 1.20;95% CI 1.12 - 1.29;P<0.001)。居住在车辆拥有率较高社区的白人和黑人患者的死亡率没有显著差异。

结论

较低的车辆拥有率与MI后死亡率增加相关。居住在车辆拥有率较低社区的黑人患者MI后的死亡率高于居住在类似社区的白人患者,但居住在车辆拥有率较高社区的黑人患者的死亡率并不比白人患者差。本研究强调了交通在确定MI后健康状况方面的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b2/10173400/9e94b9e2b855/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b2/10173400/097986374b58/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b2/10173400/eb7153826346/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b2/10173400/9e94b9e2b855/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b2/10173400/097986374b58/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b2/10173400/eb7153826346/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4b2/10173400/9e94b9e2b855/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Association between vehicle ownership and disparities in mortality after myocardial infarction.机动车拥有情况与心肌梗死后死亡率差异之间的关联。
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2023 Apr 25;14:100500. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2023.100500. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Association of Socioeconomic Disadvantage With Long-term Mortality After Myocardial Infarction: The Mass General Brigham YOUNG-MI Registry.社会经济劣势与心肌梗死后长期死亡率的关系:麻省总医院布里格姆年轻 MI 登记处。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Aug 1;6(8):880-888. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.0487.
3
Survival disparities in non-small cell lung cancer by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.非小细胞肺癌在种族、族裔和社会经济地位方面的生存差异。
Cancer J. 2014 Jul-Aug;20(4):237-45. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000058.
4
Neighborhood and Individual Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Survival Among Patients With Nonmetastatic Common Cancers.社区和个体社会经济劣势与非转移性常见癌症患者的生存。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2139593. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.39593.
5
Neighborhood income and individual education: effect on survival after myocardial infarction.邻里收入与个人教育:对心肌梗死后生存率的影响。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2008 Jun;83(6):663-9. doi: 10.4065/83.6.663.
6
Neighborhood disparities in incident hospitalized myocardial infarction in four U.S. communities: the ARIC surveillance study.美国四个社区中与居住环境相关的心肌梗死发病住院率的差异:ARIC 监测研究。
Ann Epidemiol. 2009 Dec;19(12):867-74. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.07.092. Epub 2009 Oct 7.
7
Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Care After Myocardial Infarction in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.国家心血管数据登记处中心肌梗死患者的邻里社会经济劣势与护理情况
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Jun;11(6):e004054. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004054.
8
Association of Neighborhood Demographics With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Treatment and Outcomes: Where You Live May Matter.社区人口统计学特征与院外心脏骤停治疗和结局的关系:居住地可能很重要。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;2(10):1110-1118. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2671.
9
Early-life and adult socioeconomic determinants of myocardial infarction incidence and fatality.早发性生活和成年后社会经济决定因素与心肌梗死发病率和病死率的关系。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Mar;177:100-109. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.055. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
10
Interaction Between Race and Income on Cardiac Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.种族与收入对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后心脏结局的交互作用。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Nov 15;11(22):e026676. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026676. Epub 2022 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Transportation Insecurity, Social Support, and Adherence to Cancer Screening.交通不便、社会支持与癌症筛查依从性
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2457336. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.57336.
2
Disparities in Travel-Related Barriers to Accessing Health Care From the 2017 National Household Travel Survey.2017 年美国家庭旅行调查:旅行相关障碍导致获得医疗保健服务的机会不平等。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2325291. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.25291.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of interventions for non-emergent medical transportation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非紧急医疗转运干预措施的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 21;22(1):799. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13149-1.
2
Content Analysis of Transportation Screening Questions in Social Risk Assessment Tools: Are We Capturing Transportation Insecurity?社会风险评估工具中交通筛查问题的内容分析:我们是否捕捉到了交通不安全问题?
J Am Board Fam Med. 2022 Mar-Apr;35(2):400-405. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.02.210256.
3
Neighborhood Resources and Racial/Ethnic Differences in Survival After Myocardial Infarction.
邻里资源与心肌梗死后生存的种族/民族差异
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Aug 10;78(6):632-633. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.06.007.
4
Identification of factors related to food insecurity and the implications for social determinants of health screenings.识别与食物不安全相关的因素及其对健康筛查社会决定因素的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 16;21(1):1410. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11465-6.
5
Food Insecurity and Cardiovascular Disease Risk.食物不安全与心血管疾病风险。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2021 Mar 27;23(6):24. doi: 10.1007/s11883-021-00923-6.
6
Area Deprivation Index and Rurality in Relation to Lung Cancer Prevalence and Mortality in a Rural State.农村地区的区域剥夺指数和农村性与肺癌患病率及死亡率的关系
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2020 Mar 7;4(4):pkaa011. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa011. eCollection 2020 Aug.
7
An index of geospatial disadvantage predicts both obesity and unmeasured body weight.地理空间劣势指数既可以预测肥胖,也可以预测未测量的体重。
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Feb 19;18:101067. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101067. eCollection 2020 Jun.
8
Green spaces and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.绿色空间与死亡率:队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Planet Health. 2019 Nov;3(11):e469-e477. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30215-3.
9
Social Determinants of Health: Fundamental Drivers of Health Inequity.健康的社会决定因素:健康不平等的根本驱动因素。
WMJ. 2018 Dec;117(5):231-232.
10
Racial Disparities in Patient Characteristics and Survival After Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死患者特征和生存的种族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e184240. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4240.