Medical Laboratory, Medical Education and Research Center, Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Institute of Medical Science and Technology, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Med Sci Monit. 2023 May 15;29:e939949. doi: 10.12659/MSM.939949.
BACKGROUND Self-injection locking (SIL) radar uses continuous-wave radar and an injection-locked oscillator-based frequency discriminator that receives and demodulates radar signals remotely to monitor vital signs. This study aimed to compare SIL radar with traditional electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements to monitor respiratory rate (RR) and heartbeat rate (HR) during the COVID-19 pandemic at a single hospital in Taiwan. MATERIAL AND METHODS We recruited 31 hospital staff members (16 males and 15 females) for respiratory rates (RR) and heartbeat rates (HR) detection. Data acquisition with the SIL radar and traditional ECG was performed simultaneously, and the accuracy of the measurements was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS To analyze the results, participates were divided into 2 groups (individual subject and multiple subjects) by gender (male and female), or 4 groups (underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obesity) by body mass index (BMI). The results were analyzed using mean bias errors (MBE) and limits of agreement (LOA) with a 95% confidence interval. Bland-Altman plots were utilized to illustrate the difference between the SIL radar and ECG monitor. In all BMI groups, results of RR were more accurate than HR, with a smaller MBE. Furthermore, RR and HR measurements of the male groups were more accurate than those of the female groups. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated that non-contact SIL radar could be used to accurately measure HR and RR for hospital healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic.
自注入锁定 (SIL) 雷达使用连续波雷达和基于注入锁定振荡器的频率鉴别器,通过接收和解调远程雷达信号来监测生命体征。本研究旨在比较 SIL 雷达与传统心电图 (ECG) 测量方法,以监测 COVID-19 大流行期间台湾一家医院的呼吸率 (RR) 和心率 (HR)。
我们招募了 31 名医院工作人员(16 名男性和 15 名女性)进行呼吸率 (RR) 和心率 (HR) 检测。同时进行 SIL 雷达和传统 ECG 的数据采集,并使用 Bland-Altman 分析评估测量的准确性。
为了分析结果,我们根据性别(男性和女性)将参与者分为 2 组(个体和多个个体),或根据体重指数 (BMI) 将参与者分为 4 组(体重过轻、正常体重、超重和肥胖)。使用平均偏差误差 (MBE) 和 95%置信区间的协议界限 (LOA) 分析结果。Bland-Altman 图用于说明 SIL 雷达和心电图监测仪之间的差异。在所有 BMI 组中,RR 的结果比 HR 更准确,MBE 更小。此外,男性组的 RR 和 HR 测量结果比女性组更准确。
我们证明了非接触式 SIL 雷达可用于在 COVID-19 大流行期间准确测量医院医疗保健中的 HR 和 RR。