Outcomes of supra-acetabular pin placement with and without fluoroscopic assisted: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes of fluoroscopic-assisted supra-acetabular pin placement percutaneous technique versus the open technique in traumatic pelvic fractures.

METHODS

Prospective randomized controlled trial was performed at Maharat Nakhon ratchasima hospital from January 2020 to March 2021. Time, size of wound, and position of supra-acetabular pin were recorded intraoperatively. Pin positions were confirmed and measured by postoperative CT scan. Complications such as cortex penetration, infection, hip joint violation, and lateral thigh numbness were recorded at 2 weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (40 hemipelvis) were randomized to fluoroscopic-assisted and non-fluoroscopic groups. Time taken for supra-acetabular pin placement for fluoroscopic-assisted and non-fluoroscopic-assisted groups was 211 and 522 s, respectively (P value < 0.001). Average wound size was 2.81 cm in the fluoroscopic-assisted group and 6.01 cm in the non-fluoroscopic-assisted group (P value < 0.001). Overall complications were similar in both groups with higher infection rates in the fluoroscopic-assisted group (5 and 0%, respectively).

DISCUSSION

Pelvic fracture is a life-threatening condition, which requires emergency pelvic stabilization. This study examined operative times for supra-acetabular placement and complication rates. The results show shorter operative times for the non-fluoroscopic-assisted technique without significant differences in complication rates.

CONCLUSION

Non-fluoroscopic technique greatly reduced operative times for supra-acetabular pin placement with comparable safety to the fluoroscopic-assisted technique.