Suppr超能文献

骨盆外固定中髋臼上钢针置入的开放技术:一项尸体研究

Open technique for supra-acetabular pin placement in pelvic external fixation: a cadaveric study.

作者信息

Chumchuen Sukanis, Lertpullpol Wissarut, Apivatgaroon Adinun

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, 99 Moo 18, Khlong Nueng, Khlong Luang, 12120, Pathumthani, Thailand.

出版信息

J Orthop Traumatol. 2022 Mar 14;23(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s10195-022-00635-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Standard supra-acetabular pin placement still needs fluoroscopic guidance, which is technically demanding for an untrained surgeon due to the unfamiliar fluoroscopic view and the risk of damaging some structures. The risks associated with the open technique without fluoroscopy have not yet been investigated, despite the palpable entry point and large bony corridor for rapid insertion in the limited time available for the management of unstable pelvic fracture patients. The aim of this study was to compare the open technique without fluoroscopy to the fluoroscopically assisted percutaneous technique for the positioning of supra-acetabular screws in cadavers without pelvic instability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The open technique for half-pin placement was compared to standard fluoroscopic guidance in 16 hemipelves (8 cadavers). The open technique was first performed on one side in each cadaver after simple randomization, followed by standard fluoroscopic guidance on the other side. In the open technique group, a Schanz pin 5 mm in diameter and 200 mm in length was inserted in the area just above the anteroinferior iliac spine (AIIS) and aimed with a medial inclination of 20° and a cephalad inclination of 10-20° after a 2 cm pilot drill hole had been established. Standard fluoroscopically guided pin placement was performed on the other side. Fluoroscopic assessment was conducted after final pin placement on both sides. The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve of the thigh (LFCN) and the hip capsule were identified via the Smith-Peterson approach. After complete dissection of soft tissue, it was clearly apparent that pin penetration was conducted outside the bony corridor.

RESULTS

The LFCN was found to be in a risk zone near the pin (mean distance, 15 mm; range, 0-30 mm). One LFCN may have been injured in the fluoroscopic guidance group. The mean medial inclination of the pin was 19.8° (range, 5-40°) and the mean cephalad inclination was 11.5° (range 0-20°) in the open technique group. The mean medial inclination of the pin was 30.4° (range, 20-45°) and the mean cephalad inclination was 19.3° (range, 2-35°) in the fluoroscopic guidance group. The mean distance of the pin entry point from the AIIS was 11.1 mm (range, 0-35 mm) in the open technique group. The mean distance of the entry point of the pin from the AIIS was 15.1 mm (range, 0-25 mm) in the fluoroscopic guidance group. The mean hip joint capsule distance was 12 mm (range, 8-25 mm). No joint penetration was observed in the open technique group, compared to one joint penetration in the fluoroscopic guidance group. No sciatic notch penetration was found in either group, but pin penetration outside the external cortex of the ilium was found only in the open technique group, in 4 hemipelves.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the freehand technique performed by experienced trauma surgeons may be as acceptable as controlled pin insertion under image intensification for selecting the proper entry point and stabilizing the anterior pelvic ring.

摘要

背景

标准的髋臼上缘针置入仍需透视引导,对于未经训练的外科医生来说,由于透视视野不熟悉以及存在损伤某些结构的风险,这在技术上要求较高。尽管在处理不稳定骨盆骨折患者的有限时间内,开放技术无需透视即可触及进针点且有较大的骨通道便于快速插入,但尚未对其相关风险进行研究。本研究的目的是在无骨盆不稳定的尸体上,比较无需透视的开放技术与透视辅助经皮技术在髋臼上缘螺钉定位中的应用。

材料与方法

在16个半骨盆(8具尸体)中,将半针置入的开放技术与标准透视引导进行比较。在每具尸体上,通过简单随机化后先在一侧进行开放技术操作,然后在另一侧进行标准透视引导。在开放技术组中,在髂前下棘(AIIS)上方区域插入一根直径5mm、长度200mm的斯氏针,在建立一个2cm的导针孔后,使其向内侧倾斜20°、向头侧倾斜10 - 20°。在另一侧进行标准透视引导下的针置入。在两侧最终针置入后进行透视评估。通过史密斯 - 彼得森入路识别股外侧皮神经(LFCN)和髋关节囊。在完全解剖软组织后,明显可见针穿透在骨通道之外。

结果

发现LFCN处于靠近针的风险区域(平均距离15mm;范围0 - 30mm)。透视引导组可能有1例LFCN受损。开放技术组针的平均内侧倾斜度为19.8°(范围5 - 40°),平均头侧倾斜度为11.5°(范围0 - 20°)。透视引导组针的平均内侧倾斜度为30.4°(范围20 - 45°),平均头侧倾斜度为19.3°(范围2 - 35°)。开放技术组针的进针点距AIIS的平均距离为11.1mm(范围0 - 35mm)。透视引导组针的进针点距AIIS的平均距离为15.1mm(范围0 - 25mm)。髋关节囊平均距离为12mm(范围8 - 25mm)。开放技术组未观察到关节穿透,而透视引导组有1例关节穿透。两组均未发现坐骨切迹穿透,但仅在开放技术组的4个半骨盆中发现针穿透髂骨外皮质。

结论

本研究表明,经验丰富的创伤外科医生进行的徒手技术在选择合适进针点和稳定骨盆前环方面可能与影像增强下的可控针插入一样可行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cea/8921377/56e20440327f/10195_2022_635_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验