Alsakarneh Saqr, Jaber Fouad, Ahmed Khalid, Ghanem Fares, Mohammad Wael T, Ahmed Mohamed K, Almujarkesh Mohamad Khaled, Bierman Thomas, Campbell John, Abboud Yazan, Miran Muhammad Shah, Helzberg John H, Ghoz Hassan M
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.
These authors contributed equally to the study.
Gastroenterology Res. 2023 Apr;16(2):105-117. doi: 10.14740/gr1610. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
There are conflicting data on the frequency and variability of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. Our aim was to systematically review the literature on the incidence of post-ERCP adverse events in cirrhotic patients and to examine the differences across continents.
We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases to identify studies reporting adverse events after ERCP in patients with cirrhosis from conception to September 30, 2022. The random effects model was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs), mean differences (MDs), and confidence intervals (CIs). A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane Q-statistic (I).
Twenty-one studies that included 2,576 cirrhotic patients and 3,729 individual ERCPs were analyzed. The pooled overall rate of adverse events after ERCP in patients with cirrhosis was 16.98% (95% CI: 13.06-21.29%, P < 0.001, I = 86.55%). ERCPs performed in Asia had the highest ERCP adverse events with an overall complication rate of 19.90%, while the lowest overall adverse events were in North America at 13.04%. The pooled post-ERCP bleeding, pancreatitis, cholangitis and perforation were 5.10% (95% CI: 3.33-7.19%, P < 0.001, I = 76.79%), 3.21% (95% CI: 2.20-5.36%, P = 0.03, I = 42.25%), 3.02% (95% CI: 1.19-5.52%, P < 0.001, I = 87.11%), and 0.12% (95% CI: 0.00 - 0.45, P = 0.26, I = 15.76%), respectively. The pooled post-ERCP mortality rate was 0.22% (95% CI: 0.00-0.85%, P = 0.01, I = 51.86%).
This meta-analysis shows that the overall complication rates after ERCP, bleeding, pancreatitis, and cholangitis are high in patients with cirrhosis. Because cirrhotic patients are more likely to have post-ERCP complications, with significant cross-continent variations, the risks and benefits of ERCP in this patient population should be carefully considered.
关于肝硬化患者内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)结果的频率和变异性,存在相互矛盾的数据。我们的目的是系统回顾关于肝硬化患者ERCP术后不良事件发生率的文献,并研究各大洲之间的差异。
我们检索了PubMed/MEDLINE、EMBASE、Scopus和Cochrane数据库,以识别从纳入研究至2022年9月30日报告肝硬化患者ERCP术后不良事件的研究。采用随机效应模型计算比值比(OR)、平均差(MD)和置信区间(CI)。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。使用Cochrane Q统计量(I)评估异质性。
分析了21项研究,包括2576例肝硬化患者和3729例个体ERCP。肝硬化患者ERCP术后不良事件的总体合并发生率为16.98%(95%CI:13.06-21.29%,P<0.001,I=86.55%)。在亚洲进行的ERCP不良事件发生率最高,总体并发症发生率为19.90%,而在北美总体不良事件发生率最低,为13.04%。ERCP术后出血、胰腺炎、胆管炎和穿孔的合并发生率分别为5.10%(95%CI:3.33-7.19%,P<0.001,I=76.79%)、3.21%(95%CI:2.20-5.36%,P=0.03,I=42.25%)、3.02%(95%CI:1.19-5.52%,P<0.001,I=87.11%)和0.12%(95%CI:0.00-0.45,P=0.26,I=15.76%)。ERCP术后合并死亡率为0.22%(95%CI:0.00-0.85%,P=0.01,I=51.86%)。
这项荟萃分析表明,肝硬化患者ERCP术后的总体并发症发生率、出血、胰腺炎和胆管炎发生率较高。由于肝硬化患者更易发生ERCP术后并发症,且各大洲之间存在显著差异,因此应仔细考虑ERCP在该患者群体中的风险和益处。