• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Use of ERCP in the United States over the past decade.

作者信息

Kröner Paul T, Bilal Mohammad, Samuel Ronald, Umar Shifa, Abougergi Marwan S, Lukens Frank J, Raimondo Massimo, Carr-Locke David L

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States.

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United State.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2020 Jun;8(6):E761-E769. doi: 10.1055/a-1134-4873. Epub 2020 May 25.

DOI:10.1055/a-1134-4873
PMID:32490161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7247893/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5201/7247893/548eca7cd389/10-1055-a-1134-4873-i1732ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5201/7247893/548eca7cd389/10-1055-a-1134-4873-i1732ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5201/7247893/548eca7cd389/10-1055-a-1134-4873-i1732ei1.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of ERCP in the United States over the past decade.过去十年间美国内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的使用情况。
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Jun;8(6):E761-E769. doi: 10.1055/a-1134-4873. Epub 2020 May 25.
2
Nationwide Assessment of Trends in Choledocholithiasis Management in the United States From 1998 to 2013.1998 年至 2013 年美国胆总管结石病管理趋势的全国评估。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Dec 1;151(12):1125-1130. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2059.
3
Research in THA and TKA from the United States has declined over the past decade relative to other countries.
Orthopedics. 2011 Jul 7;34(7):e245-50. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20110526-03.
4
pERCePtions on ERCP utilization in the United States.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 May;102(5):976-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01121.x.
5
Trends in same-admission cholecystectomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for acute gallstone pancreatitis: A nationwide analysis across a decade.急性胆石性胰腺炎行同期胆囊切除术和内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的趋势：跨越十年的全国性分析。
Pancreatology. 2019 Jun;19(4):524-530. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
6
Antisecretory agents for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: rationale for use and clinical results.预防内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎的抗分泌药物：使用原理及临床结果
JOP. 2003 Jan;4(1):33-40.
7
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) outcomes can improve after further training for an individual already experienced in ERCP.对于已经有内镜逆行胰胆管造影（ERCP）经验的个人，经过进一步培训后，ERCP的操作结果可以得到改善。
Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2015 Sep;61(3):117-20.
8
Stricter national standards are required for credentialing of endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography in the United States.美国需要更严格的内镜逆行胰胆管造影认证标准。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul 21;25(27):3468-3483. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i27.3468.
9
Complications related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a comprehensive clinical review.内镜逆行胰胆管造影相关并发症：全面临床综述。
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2009 Mar;18(1):73-82.
10
Trends in utilization of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP and cholecystectomy over the past 25 years: a population-based study.在过去的 25 年中，诊断性和治疗性 ERCP 和胆囊切除术的利用趋势：一项基于人群的研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Apr;79(4):615-22. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.028. Epub 2013 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of atrial fibrillation on in-hospital outcomes following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a propensity score-matched analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2020).心房颤动对内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后住院结局的影响：一项基于国家住院样本（2016 - 2020年）的倾向评分匹配分析
Ann Gastroenterol. 2025 May-Jun;38(3):345-352. doi: 10.20524/aog.2025.0964. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
2
Current status and trends in ERCP and post-ERCP pancreatitis in Japan: a nationwide observational study.日本内镜逆行胰胆管造影术（ERCP）及ERCP术后胰腺炎的现状与趋势：一项全国性观察研究
J Gastroenterol. 2025 May 2. doi: 10.1007/s00535-025-02254-8.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in same-admission cholecystectomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for acute gallstone pancreatitis: A nationwide analysis across a decade.急性胆石性胰腺炎行同期胆囊切除术和内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的趋势：跨越十年的全国性分析。
Pancreatology. 2019 Jun;19(4):524-530. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
2
ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis.ASGE 指南：内镜在胆石病评估和管理中的作用。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jun;89(6):1075-1105.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.001. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
3
Training in EUS and ERCP: standardizing methods to assess competence.
Enhancing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography safety: Predictive insights into gastric retention.
提高内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的安全性：对胃潴留的预测性见解。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Mar 27;17(3):98898. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.98898.
4
Burden and cost of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis among commercially insured people undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的商业保险人群中，内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎的负担和成本。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Mar 20. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2025.03.639.
5
Primary Needle-Knife Fistulotomy Versus Standard Transpapillary Technique for Cannulation of Long-Size Papilla: A Randomized Clinical Trial.原发性针刀瘘管切开术与标准经乳头技术用于长乳头插管的比较：一项随机临床试验
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec 1;15(12):e00788. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000788.
6
Impact of Frailty on Early Readmissions of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the United States: Where Do We Stand?衰弱对美国内镜逆行胰胆管造影术早期再入院的影响：我们目前的状况如何？
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 18;13(20):6236. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206236.
7
Assessment of The Factors Related to The Spontaneous Passage of Common Bile Duct Stones.胆总管结石自然排出相关因素的评估
J Clin Med. 2024 May 2;13(9):2672. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092672.
8
In-depth exploration of the radiation exposure to staff performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures (ERCP) through RANDO phantom and TLDs.通过 RANDO 体模和 TLD 对行内镜逆行胰胆管造影术（ERCP）的工作人员的辐射暴露进行深入探讨。
Jpn J Radiol. 2024 Sep;42(9):1058-1066. doi: 10.1007/s11604-024-01586-4. Epub 2024 May 9.
9
Impact of frailty on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes in nonagenarians: A United States national experience.衰弱对九旬老人内镜逆行胰胆管造影术结果的影响：一项美国全国性经验。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Mar 16;16(3):148-156. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i3.148.
10
Safety and indications for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in liver transplant patients: an analysis of the United States' National Inpatient Sample database.肝移植患者内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的安全性及适应证：基于美国国家住院样本数据库的分析
Ann Gastroenterol. 2023 Jul-Aug;36(4):459-465. doi: 10.20524/aog.2023.0801. Epub 2023 May 25.
超声内镜和内镜逆行胰胆管造影术培训：评估能力的标准化方法
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jun;87(6):1371-1382. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
4
The Future of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的未来
Gastroenterology. 2017 Aug;153(2):338-344. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.06.015. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
5
The future of ERCP.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的未来。
Endosc Int Open. 2017 Apr;5(4):E272-E274. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-101697.
6
Utilization trends in inpatient endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): A cross-sectional US experience.住院患者内镜逆行胰胆管造影术（ERCP）的使用趋势：一项美国横断面研究经验。
Endosc Int Open. 2017 Apr;5(4):E261-E271. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-102402.
7
Evolution in the utilization of biliary interventions in the United States: results of a nationwide longitudinal study from 1998 to 2013.美国胆道介入利用的演变：1998 年至 2013 年全国性纵向研究的结果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Aug;86(2):319-326.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.021. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
8
In-training gastrointestinal endoscopy competency assessment tools: Types of tools, validation and impact.培训中的胃肠内镜检查能力评估工具：工具类型、验证及影响
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Jun;30(3):357-74. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
9
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): core curriculum.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术（ERCP）：核心课程
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Feb;83(2):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
10
When trainees reach competency in performing ERCP: a systematic review.当实习生达到ERCP操作能力时：一项系统评价
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(6):1337-42. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.054. Epub 2015 Apr 1.