Suppr超能文献

2015年至2020年间糖尿病性黄斑水肿的治疗模式演变

Evolving Treatment Patterns in Diabetic Macular Edema Between 2015 and 2020.

作者信息

Sodhi Guneet S, Haq Zeeshan, Aggarwal Nitika, Boucher Nick, Emerson Geoffrey G, Hahn Paul

机构信息

Retina Consultants of Minnesota, Edina, MN, USA.

Vestrum Health, Naperville, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Vitreoretin Dis. 2023 Mar 2;7(3):199-202. doi: 10.1177/24741264231156096. eCollection 2023 May-Jun.

Abstract

To explore the recent evolution of diabetic macular edema (DME) treatment practice patterns over 5 years among retina specialists in the United States. This retrospective analysis assessed 306 700 eyes with newly diagnosed DME from the Vestrum Health database between January 2015 and October 2020. The year-over-year and cumulative 5-year distributions of eyes treated with antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents, steroids, focal laser, or any combination and those of untreated eyes were calculated. Changes from baseline visual acuity were assessed. Yearly treatment patterns changed significantly from 2015 (n = 18056) to 2020 (n = 11042). The proportion of untreated patients declined over time (32.7% vs 27.7%; < .001), the use of anti-VEGF monotherapy increased (43.5% vs 61.8%; < .001), the use of focal laser monotherapy declined (9.7% vs 3.0%; < .001), and the use of steroid monotherapy remained stable (0.9% vs 0.7%; = 1.000). Of eyes that maintained follow-up for 5 years (from 2015 to 2020), 16.3% were untreated while 77.5% were treated with anti-VEGF agents (as monotherapy or combination therapy). Vision gains in treated patients remained approximately stable from 2015 (3.6 letters) to 2020 (3.5 letters). From 2015 to 2020, treatment patterns for DME evolved toward greater anti-VEGF monotherapy, stable steroid monotherapy, less laser monotherapy, and fewer untreated eyes.

摘要

探讨美国视网膜专科医生在5年时间里糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)治疗实践模式的近期演变。这项回顾性分析评估了2015年1月至2020年10月期间来自Vestrum Health数据库的306700只新诊断为DME的眼睛。计算了接受抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)药物、类固醇、局部激光或任何联合治疗的眼睛以及未治疗眼睛的逐年和累计5年分布情况。评估了与基线视力的变化。从2015年(n = 18056)到2020年(n = 11042),每年的治疗模式发生了显著变化。未治疗患者的比例随时间下降(32.7%对27.7%;P <.001),anti-VEGF单药治疗的使用增加(43.5%对61.8%;P <.001),局部激光单药治疗的使用下降(9.7%对3.0%;P <.001),类固醇单药治疗的使用保持稳定(0.9%对0.7%;P = 1.000)。在保持5年随访(从2015年到2020年)的眼睛中,16.3%未接受治疗,而77.5%接受了anti-VEGF药物治疗(作为单药治疗或联合治疗)。从2015年(视力提高3.6个字母)到2020年(视力提高3.5个字母),接受治疗患者的视力改善大致保持稳定。从2015年到2020年,DME的治疗模式朝着更多的anti-VEGF单药治疗、稳定的类固醇单药治疗、更少的激光单药治疗和更少的未治疗眼睛发展。

相似文献

1
Evolving Treatment Patterns in Diabetic Macular Edema Between 2015 and 2020.
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2023 Mar 2;7(3):199-202. doi: 10.1177/24741264231156096. eCollection 2023 May-Jun.
2
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor combined with intravitreal steroids for diabetic macular oedema.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 18;4(4):CD011599. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011599.pub2.
5
Real-world Outcomes of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Diabetic Macular Edema in the United States.
Ophthalmol Retina. 2018 Dec;2(12):1179-1187. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
6
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 7;7(7):CD009510. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009510.pub3.
7
Intravitreal steroids for macular edema in diabetes.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 17;11(11):CD005656. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005656.pub3.

本文引用的文献

2
Real-World Outcomes in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Treated Long Term with Ranibizumab (VISION Study).
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec 2;14:4173-4185. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S281501. eCollection 2020.
3
Treatment Patterns for Diabetic Macular Edema: An Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS®) Registry Analysis.
Ophthalmology. 2020 Mar;127(3):427-429. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.10.019. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
5
Real-world Outcomes of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Diabetic Macular Edema in the United States.
Ophthalmol Retina. 2018 Dec;2(12):1179-1187. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
6
Treatment Efficacy and Compliance in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Ranibizumab in a Real-Life Setting.
J Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr 18;2018:4610129. doi: 10.1155/2018/4610129. eCollection 2018.
7
IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Apr;138:271-281. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.023. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
8
Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema: 148-Week Results from the VISTA and VIVID Studies.
Ophthalmology. 2016 Nov;123(11):2376-2385. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.032. Epub 2016 Sep 17.
9
Updates on the Clinical Trials in Diabetic Macular Edema.
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan-Mar;23(1):3-12. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.172293.
10
Aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 26;372(13):1193-203. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414264. Epub 2015 Feb 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验