Ding Ying, Chu Nannan, Que Linling, Huang Kai, Chen Yuanxing, Qin Wei, Qian Zhenzhong, Shi Yunfei, Xu Zhen, He Qing
Drug Clinical Trial Institution, Wuxi People's Hospital Affiliated with Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Apr 28;14:1169103. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1169103. eCollection 2023.
The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence, and safety properties between a new generic and a brand reference formulation of esomeprazole enteric-coated tablets 20 mg in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. The fasting study was an open-label, randomized, two-period crossover study conducted in 32 healthy Chinese volunteers, and the fed study was a four-period crossover study conducted in 40 healthy Chinese volunteers. Blood samples were collected at the specified time points and determined to obtain the plasma concentrations of esomeprazole. The primary pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using the non-compartment method. Bioequivalence was analyzed by the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of the two formulations and the corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CIs). The safety of the two formulations was assessed. The fasting and fed study showed that the pharmacokinetics of the two formulations was similar. Under the fasting condition, the 90% CIs of GMRs of the test-to-reference formulation were 87.92%-104.36% for C, 87.82%-101.45% for AUC, and 87.99%-101.54% for AUC; under the fed condition, the 90% CIs of GMRs of the test-to-reference formulation were 80.53%-94.95% for C, 87.46%-97.26% for AUC, and 87.46%-97.16% for AUC. The 90% CIs of GMRs fall within the bioequivalence range of 80.00%-125.00%. The two formulations had good safety and were well-tolerated, and no serious adverse events occurred. According to relevant regulatory standards, esomeprazole enteric-coated generic and reference products exhibited bioequivalence and good safety in healthy Chinese subjects. http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html, identifier CTR20171347 and CTR20171484.
本研究的主要目的是评估20毫克埃索美拉唑肠溶片剂的新仿制药与参比制剂在空腹和进食条件下,在中国健康受试者体内的药代动力学、生物等效性及安全性。空腹研究是一项开放标签、随机、两周期交叉研究,在32名中国健康志愿者中进行;进食研究是一项四周期交叉研究,在40名中国健康志愿者中进行。在指定时间点采集血样,测定埃索美拉唑的血浆浓度。采用非房室方法计算主要药代动力学参数。通过两种制剂的几何平均比值(GMRs)及相应的90%置信区间(CIs)分析生物等效性。评估两种制剂的安全性。空腹和进食研究表明,两种制剂的药代动力学相似。空腹条件下,试验制剂与参比制剂GMRs的90%CI:C为87.92%-104.36%,AUC为87.82%-101.45%,AUC为87.99%-101.54%;进食条件下,试验制剂与参比制剂GMRs的90%CI:C为80.53%-94.95%,AUC为87.46%-97.26%,AUC为87.46%-97.16%。GMRs的90%CI落在80.00%-125.00%的生物等效性范围内。两种制剂安全性良好,耐受性佳,未发生严重不良事件。根据相关监管标准,埃索美拉唑肠溶仿制药和参比制剂在中国健康受试者中表现出生物等效性和良好的安全性。http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html,标识符CTR20171347和CTR20171484。