University of Split School of Medicine, Šoltanska 2, Split, 21000, Croatia.
Cochrane Croatia, Šoltanska 2, Split, 21000, Croatia.
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023 May 15;21(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12958-023-01100-x.
Online information about PCOS lacks reliability for patients seeking information about the disease. Thus, we aimed to perform an updated analysis of the quality, accuracy, and readability of patient information on PCOS available online.
We conducted a cross-sectional study using the top five Google Trends search terms in English associated with PCOS, including "symptoms," "treatment," "test," "pregnancy," and "causes." Five separate searches in Bing, Yahoo, and Google were performed to obtain the first 10 unique webpages for each term that was categorized as commercial, non-profit organization, scientific resources, or private foundation. We used the 16-item DISCERN with Likert-responses (minimum 1, maximum 5) where the total is 80 and lowest is 16, clarity with the 32-item EQIP, where responses of no = 0 and yes = 1 (minimum 0, maximum 32), and accuracy scores with 1 denoting poor and 5 completely accurate information; low scores of each corresponded to poorly reported information. We assessed readability with Flesch-Kincaid reading ease index, where higher scores correspond to reading ease, and lower grades correspond to easier readability with Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Gunning-Fog, Coleman-Liau index, automated readability index, New Dale-Chall Readability, and simple measure of gobbledygook. We additionally assessed word and sentence characteristics. We used Kruskal-Wallis test to compare scores according to webpage categories.
Out of 150 webpages, most were commercial (n = 85, 57%), followed by non-profit organizations (n = 44, 29%), scientific resources (n = 13, 9%) and private foundations (n = 6, 4%). Google webpages had higher median DISCERN score ([Md] = 47.0) than Bing ([Md] = 42.0) and Yahoo ([Md] = 43.0) webpages; P = 0.023. No difference in EQIP scores according to search engine was found (P = 0.524). Predominantly, webpages from private foundations had higher DISCERN and EQIP scores, although comparisons were not statistically significant (P = 0.456) and P = 0.653.). Accuracy and readability were similar across search engines and webpage categories (P = 0.915, range 5.0-5.0) and (P = 0.208, range 4.0-5.0).
Quality and clarity of the data were fair according to search engine and category. Accuracy of information was high, showing that the public may encounter accurate information about PCOS. However, the readability of the information was high, reflecting a need for more readable resources about PCOS.
对于寻求多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)相关疾病信息的患者来说,在线信息的可靠性较差。因此,我们旨在对当前网上关于 PCOS 的患者信息的质量、准确性和可读性进行最新分析。
我们采用了横断面研究方法,使用与 PCOS 相关的五个英语谷歌趋势搜索热门词汇,包括“症状”、“治疗”、“检查”、“妊娠”和“病因”。我们在 Bing、Yahoo 和 Google 上分别进行了五次单独的搜索,以获取每个术语的前 10 个独特网页,这些网页被分为商业、非营利组织、科学资源或私人基金会。我们使用了 16 项 DISCERN 量表(最低 1 分,最高 5 分),总分 80 分,最低 16 分;使用了 32 项 EQIP 量表(回答为否记 0,回答为是记 1,最低 0 分,最高 32 分);使用了准确性量表,1 分表示信息较差,5 分表示信息完全准确;每个量表的得分越低表示信息报告越差。我们使用 Flesch-Kincaid 阅读流畅度指数评估可读性,分数越高表示阅读越容易,而 Flesch-Kincaid 年级水平、Gunning-Fog、Coleman-Liau 指数、自动化可读性指数、New Dale-Chall 可读性和简单测难词指数越低表示阅读越容易。我们还评估了词汇和句子特征。我们使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验比较了根据网页类别得出的分数。
在 150 个网页中,大多数是商业网页(n=85,57%),其次是非营利组织网页(n=44,29%)、科学资源网页(n=13,9%)和私人基金会网页(n=6,4%)。谷歌网页的 DISCERN 量表中位数(Md=47.0)高于 Bing(Md=42.0)和 Yahoo(Md=43.0)网页(P=0.023)。根据搜索引擎的不同,EQIP 量表得分没有差异(P=0.524)。虽然私人基金会的网页在 DISCERN 和 EQIP 量表上的得分较高,但比较没有统计学意义(P=0.456),P=0.653。)。搜索引擎和网页类别之间的准确性和可读性相似(P=0.915,范围 5.0-5.0)和(P=0.208,范围 4.0-5.0)。
根据搜索引擎和类别,数据的质量和清晰度都还不错。信息的准确性较高,这表明公众可能会遇到有关 PCOS 的准确信息。然而,信息的可读性较高,反映出人们需要更多有关 PCOS 的易读资源。