Rogowski Paul, Schönecker Stephan, Konnerth Dinah, Schäfer Annemarie, Pazos Montserrat, Gaasch Aurélie, Niyazi Maximilian, Boelke Edwin, Matuschek Christiane, Haussmann Jan, Braun Michael, Pölcher Martin, Würstlein Rachel, Harbeck Nadia, Belka Claus, Corradini Stefanie
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, 81377 Munich, Germany.
German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 81377 Munich, Germany.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 17;15(8):2334. doi: 10.3390/cancers15082334.
We aimed to evaluate the standard of care of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in elderly female patients (≥65 years) treated outside of clinical trials and to identify potential factors related to the omission of RT and the interaction with endocrine therapy (ET). All women treated with BCS at two major breast centers between 1998 and 2014 were evaluated. Data were provided by the Tumor Registry Munich. Survival analyses were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were identified using multivariate Cox regression analysis. The median follow-up was 88.4 months. Adjuvant RT was performed in 82% (2599/3171) of patients. Irradiated patients were younger (70.9 vs. 76.5 years, < 0.001) and were more likely to receive additional chemotherapy ( < 0.001) and ET ( = 0.014). Non-irradiated patients more often had non-invasive DCIS tumors (pTis: 20.3% vs. 6.8%, < 0.001) and did not undergo axillary surgery (no axillary surgery: 50.5% vs. 9.5%, < 0.001). Adjuvant RT was associated with improved locoregional tumor control after BCS in invasive tumors (10-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS): 94.0% vs. 75.1%, < 0.001, 10-year lymph node recurrence-free survival (LNRFS): 98.1% vs. 93.1%, < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed significant benefits for local control with postoperative RT. Furthermore, RT led to increased locoregional control even in patients who received ET (10-year LRFS 94.8% with ET + RT vs. 78.1% with ET alone, < 0.001 and 10-year LNRFS: 98.2% vs. 95.0%, = 0.003). Similarly, RT alone had significantly better locoregional control rates compared to ET alone (10-year LRFS 92.6% with RT alone vs. 78.1% with ET alone, < 0.001 and 10-year LNRFS: 98.0% vs. 95.0%, = 0.014). The present work confirms the efficacy of postoperative RT for breast carcinoma in elderly patients (≥65 years) treated in a modern clinical setting outside of clinical trials, even in patients who receive ET.
我们旨在评估在临床试验之外接受治疗的老年女性患者(≥65岁)保乳手术后辅助放疗(RT)的护理标准,并确定与放疗遗漏相关的潜在因素以及与内分泌治疗(ET)的相互作用。对1998年至2014年间在两个主要乳腺中心接受保乳手术的所有女性进行了评估。数据由慕尼黑肿瘤登记处提供。使用Kaplan-Meier方法进行生存分析。使用多变量Cox回归分析确定预后因素。中位随访时间为88.4个月。82%(2599/3171)的患者接受了辅助放疗。接受放疗的患者更年轻(70.9岁对76.5岁,<0.001),更有可能接受额外的化疗(<0.001)和内分泌治疗(=0.014)。未接受放疗的患者更常患有非侵袭性导管原位癌(DCIS)肿瘤(pTis:20.3%对6.8%,<0.001),且未进行腋窝手术(无腋窝手术:50.5%对9.5%,<0.001)。辅助放疗与侵袭性肿瘤保乳术后局部区域肿瘤控制的改善相关(10年局部无复发生存率(LRFS):94.0%对75.1%,<0.001;10年淋巴结无复发生存率(LNRFS):98.1%对93.1%,<0.001)。多变量分析证实术后放疗对局部控制有显著益处。此外,即使在接受内分泌治疗的患者中,放疗也能提高局部区域控制率(10年LRFS:内分泌治疗+放疗组为94.8%,单纯内分泌治疗组为78.1%,<0.001;10年LNRFS:98.2%对95.0% =0.003)。同样,与单纯内分泌治疗相比,单纯放疗的局部区域控制率明显更好(10年LRFS:单纯放疗组为92.6%,单纯内分泌治疗组为78.1%,<0.001;10年LNRFS:98.0%对95.0%,=0.014)。本研究证实了在现代临床试验之外的临床环境中,术后放疗对老年患者(≥65岁)乳腺癌的疗效,即使是在接受内分泌治疗的患者中。