• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管内超声指导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的靶病变血运重建。

Target Lesion Revascularization After Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan (K.Y., H.S., H.W., K.Y., K.O., T.K.).

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan (T.M.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 May;16(5):e012922. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.012922. Epub 2023 May 16.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.012922
PMID:37192307
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several stent expansion criteria derived from the intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) evaluation have been proposed to predict future clinical outcomes, but optimal stent expansion criteria as a guide during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are still controversial. There are no studies evaluating the utility of stent expansion criteria along with the clinical and procedural factors in predicting target lesion revascularization (TLR) after contemporary IVUS-guided PCI.

METHODS

OPTIVUS-Complex PCI study (Optimal Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) multivessel cohort was a prospective multicenter study enrolling 961 patients undergoing multivessel PCI including left anterior descending coronary artery using IVUS with an intention to meet the prespecified criteria for optimal stent expansion. We compared several stent expansion criteria (minimum stent area [MSA], MSA/distal or average reference lumen area, MSA/distal or average reference vessel area, OPTIVUS criteria, IVUS-XPL [Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on Outcomes of Xience Prime Stents in Long Lesions] criteria, ULTIMATE [Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Drug Eluting Stents Implantation in "All-Comers" Coronary Lesions] criteria, and modified MUSIC [Multicenter Ultrasound Stenting in Coronaries Study] criteria) as well as clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics between lesions with and without TLR.

RESULTS

Among 1957 lesions, the cumulative 1-year incidence of lesion-based TLR was 1.6% (30 lesions). Hemodialysis, treatment of proximal left anterior descending coronary artery lesions, calcified lesions, small proximal reference lumen area, and small MSA had univariate associations with TLR, while all of the stent expansion criteria except for MSA were not associated with TLR. The independent risk factors of TLR were calcified lesions (hazard ratio, 2.34 [95% CI, 1.03-5.32]; =0.04) and small proximal reference lumen area (Tertile 1: hazard ratio, 7.01 [95% CI, 1.45-33.93]; =0.02; and Tertile 2: hazard ratio, 5.40 [95% CI, 1.17-24.90]; =0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In contemporary IVUS-guided PCI practice, the 1-year incidence of TLR was very low. MSA, but not other stent expansion criteria, had univariate association with TLR. Independent risk factors of TLR were calcified lesions and small proximal reference lumen area, although the findings should be interpreted with caution due to small number of TLR events, limited lesion complexity, and short duration of follow-up.

摘要

背景

已经提出了几种基于血管内超声(IVUS)评估的支架扩张标准来预测未来的临床结局,但在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中作为指导的最佳支架扩张标准仍存在争议。目前还没有研究评估支架扩张标准与临床和手术因素联合预测当代 IVUS 指导下 PCI 后靶病变血运重建(TLR)的效用。

方法

OPTIVUS-Complex PCI 研究(Optimal Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention)多血管队列是一项前瞻性多中心研究,共纳入 961 例接受多血管 PCI 的患者,其中包括左前降支冠状动脉,使用 IVUS 进行治疗,目的是达到最佳支架扩张的预设标准。我们比较了几种支架扩张标准(最小支架面积[MSA]、MSA/远端或平均参考管腔面积、MSA/远端或平均参考血管面积、OPTIVUS 标准、IVUS-XPL[血管内超声指导下依维莫司洗脱支架在长病变中的影响]标准、ULTIMATE[血管内超声指导下药物洗脱支架植入所有病变]标准和改良 MUSIC[多中心冠状动脉超声支架置入研究]标准)以及临床、血管造影和手术特征在 TLR 病变与非 TLR 病变之间的差异。

结果

在 1957 个病变中,基于病变的 TLR 累积 1 年发生率为 1.6%(30 个病变)。血液透析、左前降支近段病变的治疗、钙化病变、近端参考管腔面积小和 MSA 小与 TLR 存在单变量关联,而除 MSA 外的所有支架扩张标准与 TLR 均无关联。TLR 的独立危险因素是钙化病变(危险比,2.34[95%置信区间,1.03-5.32];=0.04)和近端参考管腔面积小(Tertile 1:危险比,7.01[95%置信区间,1.45-33.93];=0.02;Tertile 2:危险比,5.40[95%置信区间,1.17-24.90];=0.03)。

结论

在当代 IVUS 指导下的 PCI 实践中,TLR 的 1 年发生率非常低。MSA,但不是其他支架扩张标准,与 TLR 有单变量关联。TLR 的独立危险因素是钙化病变和近端参考管腔面积小,尽管由于 TLR 事件数量较少、病变复杂性有限和随访时间短,这些发现的解释应谨慎进行。

相似文献

1
Target Lesion Revascularization After Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.血管内超声指导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的靶病变血运重建。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 May;16(5):e012922. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.012922. Epub 2023 May 16.
2
Stent Expansion Indexes to Predict Clinical Outcomes: An IVUS Substudy From ADAPT-DES.支架扩张指数预测临床结局:来自 ADAPT-DES 的血管内超声亚研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Aug 9;14(15):1639-1650. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.05.019.
3
Intravascular ultrasound to guide percutaneous coronary interventions: an evidence-based analysis.血管内超声引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(12):1-97. Epub 2006 Apr 1.
4
Procedural Characteristics of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Their Clinical Implications.血管内超声引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的操作特点及其临床意义。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jul 19;11(14):e025258. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025258. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
5
Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: 5-Year Follow-Up of the IVUS-XPL Randomized Trial.血管内超声指导药物洗脱支架置入的效果:IVUS-XPL 随机试验的 5 年随访结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jan 13;13(1):62-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.09.033.
6
Intravascular Imaging Predictors Associated With Cardiovascular Events After Complex PCIs.复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后与心血管事件相关的血管内成像预测因素。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Feb;18(2):e014920. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014920. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
7
Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Complex Procedures.血管内超声指导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对复杂手术患者长期临床结局的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 8;12(7):607-620. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.01.227. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
8
Is Routine Postdilation During Angiography-Guided Stent Implantation as Good as Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance?: An Analysis Using Data From IVUS-XPL and ULTIMATE.血管造影引导下支架植入术中的常规后扩张与血管内超声引导一样好吗?:一项使用IVUS-XPL和ULTIMATE数据的分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan;15(1):e011366. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011366. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
9
Comparison Between Optical Frequency Domain Imaging and Intravascular Ultrasound for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guidance in Biolimus A9-Eluting Stent Implantation: A Randomized MISTIC-1 Non-Inferiority Trial.光学相干断层成像与血管内超声在生物可吸收支架中应用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:一项随机 MISTIC-1 非劣效性试验
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;13(11):e009314. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009314. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
10
Optimal Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Disease.多支血管病变患者的最佳血管内超声引导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
JACC Asia. 2023 Mar 11;3(2):211-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.12.009. eCollection 2023 Apr.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal Stent Expansion Indices for Predicting Outcomes in PCI of Calcified Coronary Lesions.预测钙化冠状动脉病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结果的最佳支架扩张指数
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Sep 17. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02753-x.
2
Dual-Prep registry: atherectomy devices and intravascUlAr lithotripsy for the PREParation of heavily calcified coronary lesions registry.双准备注册研究:用于严重钙化冠状动脉病变准备的旋切装置和血管内碎石术注册研究
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2025 Jul;40(3):553-564. doi: 10.1007/s12928-025-01130-9. Epub 2025 May 12.
3
OCT vs Angiography for Guidance of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Calcified Lesions: The CALIPSO Randomized Clinical Trial.
光学相干断层扫描与血管造影术用于指导钙化病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:CALIPSO随机临床试验
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2025.0741.
4
CVIT 2025 clinical expert consensus document on intravascular ultrasound.《血管内超声CVIT 2025临床专家共识文件》
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2025 Apr;40(2):211-225. doi: 10.1007/s12928-025-01090-0. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
5
CVIT 2023 clinical expert consensus document on intravascular ultrasound.2023 年心血管血管内超声临床专家共识文件
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024 Jan;39(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s12928-023-00957-4. Epub 2023 Sep 1.