Regional Cardiocerebrovascular CenterWonkwang University Hospital Iksan Korea.
Nanjing First HospitalNanjing Medical University Nanjing China.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jul 19;11(14):e025258. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025258. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
Background Despite the clinical benefits to intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), most patients with coronary artery disease undergo angiography-guided PCI alone in the real-world setting. We sought to investigate the procedural characteristics of IVUS-guided PCI and their clinical outcomes, as compared with angiography-guided PCI. Methods and Results This was a cohort study using patient-level data from the IVUS-XPL (Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on the Outcomes of Xience Prime Stents in Long Lesions) and ULTIMATE (Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Drug Eluting Stents Implantation in All-Comers Coronary Lesions) clinical trials. A total of 2848 patients with 3872 native coronary lesions were included and procedural characteristics assessed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) were compared between IVUS and angiography guidance. Stent-to-reference vessel diameter ratio (ie, QCA stent sizing) was greater (1.11±0.16 versus 1.07±0.14, <0.001) and high-pressure postdilation was more frequently performed (83.7% versus 75.4%, <0.001) with IVUS guidance, whereas residual stent edge dissections were more frequent in lesions treated with IVUS guidance (4.6% versus 0.7%, <0.001). Given the dissection risk, optimal QCA stent sizing for IVUS guidance was a stent-to-QCA reference vessel diameter ratio ≥1.1 to <1.3. Among 1424 patients (1969 lesions) treated with angiography guidance, QCA stent sizing <1.0 was observed in 651 (33.1%) lesions, while QCA stent sizing ≥1.1 to <1.3 was observed in only 526 (26.7%) lesions. Under angiography guidance, patients with both QCA stent sizing ≥1.1 to <1.3 and high-pressure postdilation (235 of 1424, 16.5%) had a lower risk of 3-year target lesion failure compared with others (hazard ratio, 0.532; 95% CI, 0.293-0.966 [=0.038]). Conclusions IVUS-guided PCI resulted in larger QCA-assessed stent sizing and more frequent postdilation with high-pressure inflations. These procedures may further improve long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PCI without IVUS. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01308281 (IVUS-XPL); NCT02215915 (ULTIMATE).
尽管血管内超声(IVUS)指导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)具有临床获益,但在真实世界环境中,大多数冠状动脉疾病患者仅接受血管造影指导的 PCI。我们旨在研究 IVUS 指导 PCI 的手术特点及其临床结局,并与血管造影指导的 PCI 进行比较。
这是一项使用 IVUS-XPL(血管内超声指导 Xience Prime 支架在长病变中的应用的影响)和 ULTIMATE(所有患者冠状动脉病变中血管内超声指导药物洗脱支架植入术)临床试验患者水平数据的队列研究。共纳入 2848 例患者的 3872 例原生冠状动脉病变,通过定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)评估手术特点,并比较 IVUS 和血管造影指导下的结果。支架与参考血管直径比(即 QCA 支架尺寸)更大(1.11±0.16 比 1.07±0.14,<0.001),高压后扩张更频繁(83.7%比 75.4%,<0.001),IVUS 指导下的支架边缘夹层更常见(4.6%比 0.7%,<0.001)。鉴于夹层风险,IVUS 指导下的最佳 QCA 支架尺寸为支架与 QCA 参考血管直径比≥1.1 至<1.3。在接受血管造影指导的 1424 例患者(1969 例病变)中,651 例(33.1%)病变的 QCA 支架尺寸<1.0,而仅 526 例(26.7%)病变的 QCA 支架尺寸≥1.1 至<1.3。在血管造影指导下,同时具有 QCA 支架尺寸≥1.1 至<1.3 和高压后扩张(1424 例中的 235 例,16.5%)的患者 3 年靶病变失败风险较低(风险比,0.532;95%CI,0.293-0.966[=0.038])。
IVUS 指导的 PCI 导致 QCA 评估的支架尺寸更大,高压后扩张更频繁。这些手术可能会进一步改善没有 IVUS 指导的 PCI 患者的长期临床结局。
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT01308281(IVUS-XPL);NCT02215915(ULTIMATE)。