Brownell H H, Bihrle A M, Michelow D
Brain Lang. 1986 May;28(1):42-52. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(86)90089-1.
Agrammatic Broca's and fluent (Wernicke's and anomic) aphasics were asked to name objects depicted in outline drawings as a means of testing their ability to identify and to name objects at the basic (e.g., "chair") and subordinate (e.g., "beach chair") levels. Patients from both groups had difficulty producing subordinate names, but successfully conveyed subordinate level identifications using a variety of compensatory strategies. This report supports a separation of the naming process from the conceptual operations and structures needed to identify objects. In addition, the two aphasic groups used different strategies to circumvent their naming difficulties. Fluent patients sometimes conveyed subordinate level identifications without any mention of a basic name. Agrammatic patients in particular avoided use of pre-posed modifiers in their compensatory responses. The composition of most subordinate terms (modifier plus basic name) is discussed in relation to the normal naming process and how it is disrupted in aphasia.
向语法缺失型布洛卡失语症患者以及流畅型(韦尼克失语症和命名性失语症)失语症患者展示轮廓图中的物体,要求他们说出物体名称,以此测试他们在基础(如“椅子”)和从属(如“沙滩椅”)层面识别和命名物体的能力。两组患者在说出从属名称方面都有困难,但他们通过各种补偿策略成功传达了从属层面的识别。本报告支持将命名过程与识别物体所需的概念操作和结构区分开来。此外,这两组失语症患者使用了不同的策略来克服他们的命名困难。流畅型患者有时在未提及基础名称的情况下传达了从属层面的识别。语法缺失型患者在其补偿性回答中尤其避免使用前置修饰语。结合正常命名过程以及失语症中它是如何被破坏的,讨论了大多数从属术语(修饰语加基础名称)的构成。