Schlenck K J, Huber W, Willmes K
Brain Lang. 1987 Mar;30(2):226-44. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(87)90100-3.
Picture descriptions of aphasic patients and nonaphasic controls were analyzed with respect to type and amount of linguistic repairs and searching phenomena ("prepairs"). Repairs occurred far less frequently than prepairs, which indicates impaired postarticulatory as opposed to intact prearticulatory monitoring. Prepairs were found to be most frequent in patients with relatively good comprehension, in patients with poor production, and in those who had both good comprehension and poor production. Contrary to expectation, there was no reliable difference in the distribution of prepairs and repairs between patients with Wernicke's and Broca's aphasia, although these two groups differed in performance. Possible mechanisms of linguistic monitoring are discussed.
针对失语症患者和非失语症对照者的图片描述，分析了语言修复和搜索现象（“预修复”）的类型和数量。修复现象的发生频率远低于预修复现象，这表明发音后监测受损，而发音前监测完好。结果发现，预修复现象在理解能力相对较好的患者、表达能力较差的患者以及理解能力好但表达能力差的患者中最为常见。与预期相反，尽管韦尼克失语症患者和布洛卡失语症患者在表现上存在差异，但在预修复和修复的分布上没有可靠的差异。文中讨论了语言监测的可能机制。
