• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Does the immediate reimbursement of medical insurance reduce the socioeconomic inequality in health among the floating population? Evidence from China.医疗保险即时报销是否降低了流动人口的健康的社会经济不平等?来自中国的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 May 17;22(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01913-7.
2
The effect of trans-provincial immediate reimbursement for healthcare expenses on inequity in the utilization of healthcare services for migrants.跨省医疗费用即时报销对流动人口医疗服务利用不平等的影响。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Mar 11;23(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02096-5.
3
Does the new cooperative medical scheme reduce inequality in catastrophic health expenditure in rural China?新型农村合作医疗制度是否减少了中国农村灾难性卫生支出的不平等现象?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 14;16(1):653. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1883-7.
4
Gap analysis on hospitalized health service utilization in floating population covered by different medical insurances ----- case study from Jiangsu Province, China.不同医疗保险覆盖的流动人口住院卫生服务利用差距分析——来自中国江苏省的案例研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jun 10;18(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0992-4.
5
Improving the performance of social health insurance system through increasing outpatient expenditure reimbursement ratio: a quasi-experimental evaluation study from rural China.通过提高门诊支出报销比例来提高社会医疗保险制度绩效:来自中国农村的准实验评估研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Jun 25;17(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0799-8.
6
Income related inequalities in New Cooperative Medical Scheme: a five-year empirical study of Junan County in China.中国莒南县新农合的收入相关不平等:一项为期五年的实证研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2014 May 16;13:38. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-13-38.
7
Impacts of health insurance benefit design on percutaneous coronary intervention use and inpatient costs among patients with acute myocardial infarction in Shanghai, China.中国上海医疗保险福利设计对急性心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的使用及住院费用的影响
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Mar;32(3):265-75. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0079-9.
8
The Impact of Instant Reimbursement of Cross-Regional Medical Services on Hospitalization Costs Incurred by the Floating Population-Evidence from China.跨区域医疗服务即时报销对流动人口住院费用的影响——来自中国的证据
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jun 13;10(6):1099. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10061099.
9
The inequality of inpatient care net benefit under integration of urban-rural medical insurance systems in China.中国城乡医保整合下住院医疗净效益的不平等。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Nov 22;17(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0891-0.
10
Measurement and decomposition of income-related inequality in self-rated health among the elderly in China.测量和分解中国老年人自评健康相关收入不平等。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jan 8;18(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0909-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Associated with the Utilization of Out-of-Region Medical Institutions for Brain Diseases.与脑部疾病患者选择外地医疗机构就医相关的因素
Yonsei Med J. 2025 Sep;66(9):599-608. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2024.0510.
2
Empowering the Aging Workforce: The Impact of Medical Insurance on Labor Decisions in Rural China.助力老年劳动力:医疗保险对中国农村劳动力决策的影响
Iran J Public Health. 2025 Jul;54(7):1434-1443. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v54i7.19149.
3
How Does the Basic Urban-Rural Medical Insurance Affect Resident Health Inequality? Evidence from China.基本城乡医疗保险如何影响居民健康不平等?来自中国的证据。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 17;13(12):1455. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121455.
4
Can medical consortiums bridge the gap in health inequity in China? A propensity score matching analysis.医疗联合体能否弥合中国医疗公平性的差距?一项倾向得分匹配分析。
Health Policy Plan. 2025 Aug 18;40(7):727-736. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaf031.
5
Does the trans-provincial immediate reimbursement reduce health gap between urban and rural floating population? Evidence from China.跨省即时报销是否缩小了城乡流动人口之间的健康差距?来自中国的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 17;25(1):1826. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23027-1.
6
Health inequalities for China's low-income population: trends, subgroup differences, and influencing factors, 2010-2022.2010 - 2022年中国低收入人群的健康不平等:趋势、亚组差异及影响因素
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 10;13:1569726. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1569726. eCollection 2025.
7
Accessibility of basic public health service promotes social integration of elderly migrants in China.基本公共卫生服务的可及性促进了中国老年流动人口的社会融入。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 28;15(1):10685. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95146-z.
8
Misconceptions, prejudice and social distance towards people with alcohol use disorders in China.中国对酒精使用障碍患者的误解、偏见及社会距离
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 19;25(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06595-9.
9
Health Equity of Hypertension Management Between Local Residents and Internal Migrants in Shenzhen, China: Cross-Sectional Study.中国深圳本地居民与外来务工人员高血压管理的健康公平性:横断面研究
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 Feb 10;11:e65548. doi: 10.2196/65548.
10
The Role of Social Integration in Chronic Disease Prevalences Among the Internal Migrant Populations in China: Evidence from a National Survey.社会融合在中国内部流动人口慢性病患病率中的作用:来自一项全国性调查的证据
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jan 2;13(1):69. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13010069.

本文引用的文献

1
Socio-economic inequalities in health among older adults in China.中国老年人健康的社会经济不平等。
Public Health. 2023 Jan;214:146-152. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.11.013. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
2
Income-related inequality in smoking habits: A comparative assessment in the European Union.吸烟习惯方面与收入相关的不平等:欧盟的一项比较评估。
Health Policy. 2023 Feb;128:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.12.002. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
3
Exploring how social inequalities in health have influenced the design of Mali's SARS-CoV-2 testing policy: a qualitative study.探究健康方面的社会不平等如何影响马里的新冠病毒检测政策设计:一项定性研究
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Mar 16;38(3):301-309. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czac097.
4
Working conditions in essential occupations and the role of migrants.关键职业的工作条件与移民的作用。
Econ Anal Policy. 2022 Jun;74:250-261. doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2022.02.002. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
5
"It's not just about being here, but what brought you here": A qualitative study of the role of migration experiences in shaping im/migrant women's access to healthcare.“重要的不仅是在这里,还有是什么让你来到这里”:一项关于移民经历在塑造移民妇女获得医疗保健方面作用的定性研究。
Health Place. 2022 Sep;77:102888. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102888. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
6
Social health insurance consolidation and urban-rural inequality in utilization and financial risk protection in China.社会医疗保险整合与中国利用和财务风险保护的城乡不平等。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Sep;308:115200. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115200. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
7
Does direct settlement of intra-province medical reimbursements improve financial protection among middle-aged and elderly population in China? Evidence based on CHARLS data.省内医疗费用直接结算是否能提高中国中老年人群的财务保障?基于 CHARLS 数据的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Sep;308:115187. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115187. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
8
Did the Integrated Urban and Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance Improve Benefit Equity in China?城乡居民基本医疗保险整合是否改善了中国的受益公平性?
Value Health. 2022 Sep;25(9):1548-1558. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.03.007. Epub 2022 May 3.
9
Healthcare coverage and out-of-pocket medical expenses: evidence from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and the medical expense deduction.医疗保险覆盖范围和自付医疗费用:来自 2017 年减税和就业法案及医疗费用扣除的证据。
Public Health. 2022 Apr;205:58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.01.022. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
10
Effects of establishing a financing scheme for outpatient care on inpatient services: empirical evidence from a quasi-experiment in China.建立门诊医疗融资计划对住院服务的影响:来自中国准实验的经验证据。
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Feb;23(1):7-22. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01340-x. Epub 2021 Jul 5.

医疗保险即时报销是否降低了流动人口的健康的社会经济不平等?来自中国的证据。

Does the immediate reimbursement of medical insurance reduce the socioeconomic inequality in health among the floating population? Evidence from China.

机构信息

School of Public Administration, Hunan University, Lushan Road (S), Yuelu District, Changsha, 410082, China.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2023 May 17;22(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01913-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12939-023-01913-7
PMID:37198632
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10193614/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Enhancing health intervention for floating populations has become an essential aspect of public health around the world. China launched a policy reform aimed at implementing immediate reimbursement for trans-provincial inpatient treatments. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of this policy change on socioeconomic inequality in health among the floating population.

METHODS

This study used two waves of individual-level data from the China Migrants Dynamic Survey (CMDS) collected in 2017 and 2018 as well as administrative hospital data at the city level. The sample included 122061 individuals and 262 cities. Under a quasi-experimental research design, we built up the framework to employ the generalized and multi-period difference-in-differences estimation strategy. We used the number of qualified hospitals that could provide immediate reimbursement to represent the degree and intensity of the implementation of this policy change. We also calculated the Wagstaff Index (WI) to measure socioeconomic inequality in health.

RESULTS

This policy change and income level had a negative joint impact on the health status of floating population (odds ratio = 0.955, P < 0.01), that is, the lower the income, the better the number of qualified hospitals' effect on health improvement. Furthermore, as the number of qualified tertiary hospitals increased, the health inequality would decrease significantly on average at the city level (P < 0.05). In addition, inpatient utilization as well as total expenditure and reimbursement significantly improved after the policy change, and the magnitude of increase was greater in the relatively lower-income group (P < 0.01). Finally, only inpatient spending could obtain immediate reimbursement in the early stage, thus, compared with primary care, these impacts were greater in tertiary care.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed that after the implementation of immediate reimbursement, the floating population could obtain greater and more timely reimbursement, which significantly increased its inpatient utilization, promoted health, and reduced the health inequality caused by socioeconomic factors. These results suggest that a more accessible and friendly medical insurance scheme should be promoted for this group.

摘要

背景

加强流动人口的健康干预已成为全球公共卫生的重要内容。中国出台了一项政策改革,旨在实现跨省住院治疗即时报销。本研究旨在调查这一政策变化对流动人口健康的社会经济不平等的影响。

方法

本研究使用了 2017 年和 2018 年两次中国流动人口动态调查(CMDS)的个人层面数据以及城市层面的行政医院数据。样本包括 122061 人和 262 个城市。采用准实验研究设计,我们建立了框架,采用广义多期差分差异估计策略。我们用能够提供即时报销的合格医院数量来表示这一政策变化的程度和强度。我们还计算了 Wagstaff 指数(WI)来衡量健康的社会经济不平等。

结果

这一政策变化和收入水平对流动人口的健康状况产生了负向的联合影响(比值比=0.955,P<0.01),即收入越低,合格医院数量对健康改善的效果越好。此外,随着合格三级医院数量的增加,城市层面的健康不平等程度平均显著下降(P<0.05)。此外,政策变化后,住院利用以及总支出和报销均显著增加,而低收入组的增加幅度更大(P<0.01)。最后,只有住院费用可以在早期获得即时报销,因此与初级保健相比,这些影响在三级保健中更大。

结论

本研究表明,即时报销实施后,流动人口能够获得更大、更及时的报销,这显著增加了其住院利用,促进了健康,并减少了社会经济因素导致的健康不平等。这些结果表明,应向这一群体推广更易获得和更友好的医疗保险计划。