• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗联合体能否弥合中国医疗公平性的差距?一项倾向得分匹配分析。

Can medical consortiums bridge the gap in health inequity in China? A propensity score matching analysis.

作者信息

Feng Chong, Chen Yusheng, Wang WeiWei, Chen Shuzhen

机构信息

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xiamen University of Technology, No. 600 Ligong Road, Jimei District, Xiamen 361024, Fujian, China.

Data Mining Research Center, Xiamen University, No. 422 Siming South Road, Siming District, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, China.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2025 Aug 18;40(7):727-736. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaf031.

DOI:10.1093/heapol/czaf031
PMID:40434033
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12360172/
Abstract

While health is a fundamental right, health inequities between urban and rural residents remain significant in China. Medical consortia aim to bridge this gap by providing equitable and affordable healthcare. However, their effectiveness in enhancing health equity remains underexplored. This study aims to explore whether medical consortia have mitigated health inequity between urban and rural residents. We employed propensity score matching to mitigate selection bias among 9918 electronic medical records. We focused on two key areas: the effectiveness of medical consortia in reducing healthcare burdens and their influence on health equity, as indicated by the disparities in medical expenses between urban and rural residents. To obtain more detailed insights, we segmented medical expenses into low, medium, and high categories for both urban and rural residents and examined how medical consortia differentially affect health equity across these segments. Moreover, we evaluated whether the differences in referral effects on medical expenses between urban and rural residents can be explained by their varying disease structures and age distributions. We found that medical consortia can significantly reduce the medical burden on populations, but have limitations in improving health equity. The findings highlight a substantial reduction in medical expenses for urban populations. However, no significant reduction was observed in rural populations, with the low-medical-expense group experiencing an increased healthcare burden following the implementation of medical consortia. These findings are robust across various matching methods. Despite reducing healthcare burdens, medical consortia have not equalized health outcomes between urban and rural residents. Significant differences in the disease and age structures exist between urban and rural residents, which may account for the differing causal effects observed between them. Policymakers must prioritize health equity in healthcare reform and consider targeted interventions to address the distinct healthcare challenges of different socioeconomic groups.

摘要

虽然健康是一项基本权利,但在中国,城乡居民之间的健康不平等现象仍然显著。医疗联合体旨在通过提供公平且负担得起的医疗服务来弥合这一差距。然而,它们在增强健康公平方面的有效性仍未得到充分探索。本研究旨在探讨医疗联合体是否减轻了城乡居民之间的健康不平等。我们采用倾向得分匹配法来减轻9918份电子病历中的选择偏差。我们关注两个关键领域:医疗联合体在减轻医疗负担方面的有效性及其对健康公平的影响,这体现在城乡居民医疗费用的差异上。为了获得更详细的见解,我们将城乡居民的医疗费用分为低、中、高三个类别,并研究医疗联合体如何对这些细分群体的健康公平产生不同影响。此外,我们评估了城乡居民在医疗费用转诊效果上的差异是否可以通过其不同的疾病结构和年龄分布来解释。我们发现,医疗联合体可以显著减轻人群的医疗负担,但在改善健康公平方面存在局限性。研究结果凸显了城市人群医疗费用的大幅降低。然而,农村人群并未观察到显著降低,低医疗费用组在医疗联合体实施后医疗负担有所增加。这些发现在各种匹配方法中都是稳健的。尽管减轻了医疗负担,但医疗联合体并未使城乡居民的健康结果均等化。城乡居民在疾病和年龄结构上存在显著差异,这可能解释了两者之间观察到的不同因果效应。政策制定者必须在医疗改革中优先考虑健康公平,并考虑有针对性的干预措施,以应对不同社会经济群体独特的医疗挑战。

相似文献

1
Can medical consortiums bridge the gap in health inequity in China? A propensity score matching analysis.医疗联合体能否弥合中国医疗公平性的差距?一项倾向得分匹配分析。
Health Policy Plan. 2025 Aug 18;40(7):727-736. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaf031.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Investigation and analysis of mental health status of the older adult in western rural areas.西部农村地区老年人心理健康状况的调查与分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 16;13:1612600. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612600. eCollection 2025.
4
Reducing health inequalities through general practice: a realist review and action framework.通过全科医疗减少健康不平等:一个现实主义综述和行动框架。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Mar;12(7):1-104. doi: 10.3310/YTWW7032.
5
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
6
Healthcare workers' informal uses of mobile phones and other mobile devices to support their work: a qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员非正规使用手机和其他移动设备来支持工作:定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 27;8(8):CD015705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015705.pub2.
7
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
8
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
9
Evaluating the differences in healthy lifestyle behaviors between Chinese urban and rural residency after the termination of social distancing: analysis based on propensity score matching.评估社交距离解除后中国城乡居民健康生活方式行为的差异:基于倾向得分匹配的分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 27;25(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21442-y.
10
Geospatial analysis of healthcare and older adult care institutions in Wuhan: a multimethod approach to assessing spatial equity.武汉医疗保健与老年护理机构的地理空间分析:一种评估空间公平性的多方法途径
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 5;13:1580630. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1580630. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Does competition support integrated care to improve quality?竞争是否有助于支持整合式照护以提高质量?
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 23;10(3):e24836. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24836. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
2
Measuring health equity in the ASEAN region: conceptual framework and assessment of data availability.衡量东盟地区的健康公平性:概念框架和数据可用性评估。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Dec 5;22(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-02059-2.
3
Perceived knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding the medical consortium among medical staff in Sichuan, China: a cross-sectional survey.中国四川医务人员对医疗联合体的认知、态度和实践:一项横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 29;23(1):1318. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10146-x.
4
Successes and challenges of China's health care reform: a four-decade perspective spanning 1985-2023.中国医疗改革的成功与挑战:1985年至2023年的四十年视角
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Aug 30;21(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00461-9.
5
Does the immediate reimbursement of medical insurance reduce the socioeconomic inequality in health among the floating population? Evidence from China.医疗保险即时报销是否降低了流动人口的健康的社会经济不平等?来自中国的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 May 17;22(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01913-7.
6
Vertical Integration of Electronic Health Records in Medical Consortiums: Dynamic Modeling Approach Based on the Evolutionary Game Theory.医疗联盟中电子健康记录的垂直整合:基于演化博弈论的动态建模方法
JMIR Serious Games. 2023 Mar 6;11:e41528. doi: 10.2196/41528.
7
The Impact of County Medical Community Reform on the Medical Service Efficiency of County-Level Public General Hospitals in China: A Case Study of Shanxi Province.中国县级公立综合医院医疗服务效率的县乡医疗共同体改革影响:以山西省为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 24;19(21):13827. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113827.
8
Team Relationships and Performance: Evidence from Healthcare Referral Networks.团队关系与绩效:来自医疗转诊网络的证据
Manage Sci. 2022 May;68(5):3175-3973. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2021.4091. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
9
Patients gather in large hospitals: the current situation of Chinese hospitals and the direction of medical reform.患者聚集在大型医院:中国医院的现状与医改方向。
Postgrad Med J. 2022 Dec;98(1166):e43. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-140147. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
10
Measuring health inequalities: a systematic review of widely used indicators and topics.测量健康不平等:广泛使用的指标和主题的系统评价。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Mar 10;20(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01397-3.