• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effects of care of multimorbid patients in general practices by advanced practice nurses (FAMOUS): study protocol for a nonrandomized controlled trial.多模式患者在一般实践中的护理效果由高级执业护士(FAMOUS):一项非随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 17;23(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09460-1.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Health information management of older, multimorbid patients in German primary care: feasibility and first results of the outcome measures of a cluster-randomised controlled pilot trial - HYPERION-TransCare.德国初级保健中多病共存老年患者的健康信息管理:一项整群随机对照试验——HYPERION-TransCare的可行性及结局指标的初步结果
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Apr 5;26(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02774-5.
4
Collaborative mental health care program versus a general practitioner program and usual care for treatment of patients with mental or neurological disorders in Germany: protocol of a multiperspective evaluation study.协作式精神卫生保健计划与全科医生计划和常规护理治疗德国精神或神经障碍患者的比较:多视角评估研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 25;18(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1914-5.
5
The Fear Reduction Exercised Early (FREE) approach to low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.早期恐惧减轻运动(FREE)治疗腰痛方法:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Oct 17;18(1):484. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2225-8.
6
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
7
Personalized, interdisciplinary patient pathway for cross-sector care of multimorbid patients (eliPfad trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.多病症患者跨部门护理的个性化、跨学科患者路径(eliPfad试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2024 Mar 11;25(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08026-8.
8
Effectiveness of an adaptive, multifaceted intervention to enhance care for patients with complex multimorbidity in general practice: protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial (the MM600 trial).增强全科医疗中复杂多病种患者护理的适应性、多方面干预措施的效果:一项实用的群组随机对照试验(MM600 试验)方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 2;14(2):e077441. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077441.
9
Advanced nursing practice and interprofessional dementia care (InDePendent): study protocol for a multi-center, cluster-randomized, controlled, interventional trial.高级护理实践与跨专业痴呆护理(InDePendent):一项多中心、整群随机、对照、干预性试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Apr 11;23(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06249-1.
10
A patient-centred care model for patients with complicated multimorbidity: Protocol for a pilot cluster randomised trial in general practice, municipalities, and hospitals.一种针对患有复杂多种慢性病患者的以患者为中心的护理模式:一项在全科医疗、市政当局和医院中进行的试点整群随机试验方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 4;19(12):e0310697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310697. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
[Focusing on intersectorality-strategies and current research projects for the care of geriatric people].[聚焦跨部门合作——老年护理的策略与当前研究项目]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 May;67(5):595-604. doi: 10.1007/s00103-024-03851-3. Epub 2024 Mar 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) in a Population of Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis.健康评估问卷(HAQ)在多发性硬化症患者群体中的心理测量学特性评估。
Front Neurol. 2022 Mar 28;13:847786. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.847786. eCollection 2022.
2
The level of quality care nurse practitioners provide compared with their physician colleagues in the primary care setting: A systematic review.在初级保健环境中,执业护士与医生同事相比所提供的优质护理水平:一项系统综述。
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2022 Mar 1;34(3):457-464. doi: 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000660.
3
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架:对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
4
Easier Said Than Done: Healthcare Professionals' Barriers to the Provision of Patient-Centered Primary Care to Patients with Multimorbidity.说来容易做来难:医疗专业人员为多病共存患者提供以患者为中心的初级保健的障碍。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 4;18(11):6057. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18116057.
5
Adverse Outcomes of Polypharmacy in Older People: Systematic Review of Reviews.老年人多种药物治疗的不良后果:系统评价综述。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Feb;21(2):181-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.10.022. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
6
Substituting physicians with nurse practitioners, physician assistants or nurses in nursing homes: a realist evaluation case study.在养老院中用护士从业者、医师助理或护士替代医生:一项基于实际情况的评估案例研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 24;9(5):e028169. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028169.
7
Validity of the Mini-Nutritional Assessment Scale for Evaluating Frailty Status in Older Adults.Mini-Nutritional Assessment Scale 评估老年人虚弱状态的有效性。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Feb;20(2):183-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.07.016. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
8
Validity and reliability of the Health Assessment Questionnaire among patients with spondyloarthritis in Singapore.健康评估问卷在新加坡脊柱关节炎患者中的效度和信度。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2018 Mar;21(3):699-704. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12989. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
9
Reliability and validity of the German translation of the de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) performed by physiotherapists in patients admitted to a sub-acute inpatient geriatric rehabilitation hospital.在一家亚急性老年住院康复医院收治的患者中,物理治疗师对德莫顿运动指数(DEMMI)德语翻译版本的可靠性和有效性。
BMC Geriatr. 2015 May 3;15:58. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0035-y.
10
Managing patients with multimorbidity in primary care.在基层医疗中管理患有多种疾病的患者。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 20;350:h176. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h176.

多模式患者在一般实践中的护理效果由高级执业护士(FAMOUS):一项非随机对照试验的研究方案。

Effects of care of multimorbid patients in general practices by advanced practice nurses (FAMOUS): study protocol for a nonrandomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Care and Nursing, Catholic University of Applied Sciences Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 17;23(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09460-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-023-09460-1
PMID:37198637
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10189994/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multimorbidity is a common phenomenon among patients treated in general practices. Key challenges within this group include functional difficulties, polypharmacy, treatment burden, fragmentation of care, reduced quality of life and increased health care utilization. These problems cannot be solved in the short consultation time of a general practitioner (GP) since there is an increasing shortage of GPs. In many countries, advanced practice nurses (APNs) are successfully integrated into primary health care for multimorbid patients. The objective of this study is to examine whether the integration of APNs in the primary care of multimorbid patients in Germany leads to optimized care of the target group and to a reduction in the workload of the GPs.

METHODS

The intervention includes the integration of APNs into the care for multimorbid patients in general practice for twelve months. Qualifications for APNs include a master's level academic degree and 500 hours of project-specific training. Their tasks include in-depth assessment, preparation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of a person-centred and evidence-based care plan. In this nonrandomized controlled trial, a prospective multicentre mixed methods study will be performed. The main inclusion criterion was the cooccurrence of three chronic diseases. For data collection in the intervention group (n = 817), routine data from health insurance companies and association of statutory health insurance physicians (ASHIP) will be used, as well as qualitative interviews. In addition, the intervention will be assessed through documentation of the care process and standardized questionnaires using a longitudinal design. The control group (n = 1634) will receive standard care. For the evaluation, routine data from health insurance companies are matched at a ratio of 1:2. Outcomes will be measured using emergency contacts and GP visits, treatment costs, health status of the patients and the satisfaction of parties involved. The statistical analyses will include Poisson regression to compare outcomes between the intervention and control groups. Descriptive and analytical statistical methods will be used in the longitudinal analysis of the intervention group data. Cost analysis will compare total costs and subgroup costs between the intervention and control groups. Qualitative data will be analysed using content analysis.

DISCUSSION

Challenges to this protocol could include the political and strategic environment as well as the planned number of participants.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

DRKS00026172 on DRKS.

摘要

背景

多病共存是在全科诊所接受治疗的患者中常见的现象。该人群的主要挑战包括功能困难、多种药物治疗、治疗负担、护理碎片化、生活质量降低和医疗保健利用增加。这些问题在全科医生(GP)的短咨询时间内无法解决,因为 GP 短缺日益严重。在许多国家,高级执业护士(APN)成功地整合到了多患者的初级保健中。本研究的目的是检验德国将 APN 整合到多病共存患者的初级保健中是否会优化目标人群的护理,并减轻 GP 的工作量。

方法

该干预措施包括将 APN 整合到全科医生对多病共存患者的护理中,为期 12 个月。APN 的资格包括硕士学位和 500 小时的特定项目培训。他们的任务包括深入评估、准备、实施、监测和评估以患者为中心和基于证据的护理计划。在这项非随机对照试验中,将进行前瞻性多中心混合方法研究。主要纳入标准是三种慢性疾病同时存在。对于干预组(n=817)的数据收集,将使用健康保险公司和法定健康保险医师协会(ASHIP)的常规数据以及定性访谈。此外,将通过使用纵向设计记录护理过程和标准化问卷来评估干预措施。对照组(n=1634)将接受标准护理。对于评估,将使用健康保险公司的常规数据以 1:2 的比例进行匹配。通过急诊联系和 GP 就诊、治疗费用、患者健康状况和利益相关方的满意度来衡量结果。统计分析将包括泊松回归,以比较干预组和对照组的结果。将使用描述性和分析性统计方法对干预组数据进行纵向分析。成本分析将比较干预组和对照组之间的总费用和亚组费用。定性数据将使用内容分析进行分析。

讨论

该方案可能面临的挑战包括政治和战略环境以及计划的参与者人数。

试验注册

DRKS00026172 在 DRKS 上注册。