• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证 LPA-SQUASH 在肝移植后的患者中的应用。

Validation of the LPA-SQUASH in post-liver-transplant patients.

机构信息

Fukuoka Jo Gakuin Nursing University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Department of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2023 Oct;20(4):e12540. doi: 10.1111/jjns.12540. Epub 2023 May 17.

DOI:10.1111/jjns.12540
PMID:37199019
Abstract

AIM

This study aimed to validate the revised Short Questionnaire to Assess Health-Enhancing Physical Activity (SQUASH) to measure sedentary activity in post-liver-transplant patients. The proposed scale could be useful for transplantation nurses to assess and modify sedentary lifestyles and increase physical activity.

METHODS

The SQUASH was modified to include items on sitting time and light-intensity physical activity (LPA-SQUASH). A pilot study was conducted with 20 liver transplant patients, and an expert panel validated the scale contents. Then, post-liver-transplant outpatients at a Japanese university hospital participated in the main study (September-October 2020), in which questionnaires were mailed twice to assess test-retest reliability, and accelerometers used to establish criterion validity. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for test-retest reliability. Spearman correlations and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess validity and measurement error.

RESULTS

In total, 173 participants returned the questionnaires, and 106 and 71 completed the reliability and validation studies, respectively. The range of LPA-SQUASH correlation coefficients for test-retest was .49-.58. ICCs ranged from .72 to .80 for items other than leisure. Accelerometer data and the LPA-SQUASH total physical activity amount and light-intensity physical activity correlated moderately.

CONCLUSION

We modified the SQUASH, which was developed to measure physical activity in healthy adults, to assess light-intensity physical activity in post-liver-transplant patients. The LPA-SQUASH showed acceptable validity and reliability. The questionnaire may be used by transplantation nurses to examine light-intensity physical activity content/duration, deliver patient education considering patients' sedentary lifestyle, and facilitate goal setting for physical activity interventions to prevent metabolic syndrome.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在验证修订后的简短评估健康促进体力活动问卷(SQUASH),以测量肝移植后患者的久坐活动。该量表可用于移植护士评估和改变久坐生活方式并增加体力活动。

方法

SQUASH 进行了修改,纳入了久坐时间和低强度体力活动(LPA-SQUASH)的项目。对 20 名肝移植患者进行了试点研究,并由专家小组验证了量表内容。然后,日本一所大学医院的肝移植门诊患者参加了主要研究(2020 年 9 月至 10 月),通过邮寄问卷两次评估测试-重测信度,并使用加速度计建立效标效度。计算了测试-重测信度的组内相关系数(ICC)。使用 Spearman 相关系数和 Bland-Altman 图评估效度和测量误差。

结果

共有 173 名参与者返回了问卷,106 名和 71 名分别完成了可靠性和验证研究。LPA-SQUASH 测试-重测相关性的范围为.49-.58。除休闲外,其他项目的 ICC 范围为.72 至.80。加速度计数据与 LPA-SQUASH 总体力活动量和低强度体力活动呈中度相关。

结论

我们修改了 SQUASH,该问卷最初是为测量健康成年人的体力活动而开发的,现用于评估肝移植后患者的低强度体力活动。LPA-SQUASH 具有可接受的有效性和可靠性。移植护士可以使用该问卷检查低强度体力活动的内容/持续时间,根据患者的久坐生活方式提供患者教育,并促进设定体力活动干预目标,以预防代谢综合征。

相似文献

1
Validation of the LPA-SQUASH in post-liver-transplant patients.验证 LPA-SQUASH 在肝移植后的患者中的应用。
Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2023 Oct;20(4):e12540. doi: 10.1111/jjns.12540. Epub 2023 May 17.
2
Test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the Adapted Short QUestionnaire to ASsess Health-enhancing physical activity (Adapted-SQUASH) in adults with disabilities.残疾成年人健康促进身体活动适应简短问卷(Adapted-SQUASH)的重测信度和同时效度。
J Sports Sci. 2021 Apr;39(8):875-886. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1850983. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
3
Assessment of sedentary behaviors and transport-related activities by questionnaire: a validation study.通过问卷调查评估久坐行为和与交通相关的活动:一项验证研究。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 9;16:753. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3412-3.
4
[Validity and reliability of the Work-related Physical Activity Questionnaire for assessing intensity-specific physical activity and sedentary behavior in the workplace].用于评估工作场所特定强度身体活动和久坐行为的工作相关身体活动问卷的效度和信度
Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2020 Mar 25;62(2):61-71. doi: 10.1539/sangyoeisei.2019-013-B. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
5
The mSQUASH; a valid, reliable and responsive questionnaire for daily physical activity in patients with axial spondyloarthritis.mSQUASH 问卷:一种评估中轴型脊柱关节炎患者日常体力活动的有效、可靠和敏感的工具。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2021 Aug;51(4):719-727. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.05.004. Epub 2021 May 20.
6
Daily physical activity in ankylosing spondylitis: validity and reliability of the IPAQ and SQUASH and the relation with clinical assessments.强直性脊柱炎患者的日常身体活动:国际体力活动问卷(IPAQ)和脊柱关节炎日常活动量表(SQUASH)的有效性和可靠性及其与临床评估的关系
Arthritis Res Ther. 2013 Aug 23;15(4):R99. doi: 10.1186/ar4279.
7
Reliability and validity of three questionnaires measuring context-specific sedentary behaviour and associated correlates in adolescents, adults and older adults.三份测量青少年、成年人和老年人特定情境下久坐行为及相关关联因素的问卷的信效度
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Sep 17;12:117. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0277-2.
8
Reliability and validity of the short questionnaire to assess health-enhancing physical activity (SQUASH) in patients after total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术后患者健康促进身体活动简短问卷(SQUASH)的信效度研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Oct 17;9:141. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-141.
9
Development and evaluation of the sedentary behavior and light-intensity physical activity questionnaire.久坐行为与轻度身体活动问卷的编制与评估
J Phys Ther Sci. 2021 Feb;33(2):125-131. doi: 10.1589/jpts.33.125. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
10
Reliability and validity of the Youth Leisure-time Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire (YLSBQ).青少年闲暇时间久坐行为问卷(YLSBQ)的信度和效度
J Sci Med Sport. 2018 Jan;21(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.031. Epub 2017 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale in Older People Undergoing Lower Extremity Arthroplasty.日本版运动自我效能量表在接受下肢关节置换术的老年人中的信效度
Nurs Health Sci. 2025 Jun;27(2):e70111. doi: 10.1111/nhs.70111.