Management School, Hainan University, Haikou, China.
School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Henan University of Urban Construction, Pingdingshan, China.
PLoS One. 2023 May 18;18(5):e0285860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285860. eCollection 2023.
Currently, platforms (such as Amazon.com and JD.com) are gradually transitioning from pure resellers to platforms providing hybrid channel structures. In a hybrid channel, the reselling channel and the agency channel on the platform are simultaneously used. Therefore, according to the agent who sells through the agency channel (manufacturer or third-party retailer), two kinds of hybrid channel structurers can be selected by the platform. At the same time, due to the intense competition caused by the hybrid channel structure, platforms take the initiative to implement the product quality distribution strategy in which different quality products are sold through various retailing channels. Thus, from the perspective of platforms, how to coordinate the selection of hybrid channel structures and the implementation of the product quality distribution strategy is a significant issue that has been overlooked in existing literature. This paper proposes game-theoretic models to investigate whether a platform should choose "which" hybrid channel structure to use and decide "whether" to adopt the product quality distribution strategy. Our analysis shows that the game equilibrium is affected by the commission rate, the product differentiation level, and the production cost. More specifically, first, it is interestingly found that if the product differentiation level exceeds a particular threshold, the product quality distribution strategy can negatively influence the retailer to abandon the hybrid retailing mode. In contrast, the manufacturer continues to sell through the agency channel as a part of the product distribution plan. Second, regardless of the channel configuration, we find that the platform chooses to increase the order quantity with the help of the product distribution plan. Third, contrary to popular belief, the product quality distribution strategy can only benefit the platform when the third-party retailer participates in hybrid retailing with a suitable commission rate and product differentiation level. Fourth, the platform should make decisions on the above two strategies concurrently; otherwise, agency sellers (manufacturer or third-party retailer) will oppose the product quality distribution strategy. Our key findings can assist stakeholders in making strategic decisions about hybrid retailing modes and product distribution.
目前,平台(如亚马逊和京东)正在逐渐从纯粹的转售商转变为提供混合渠道结构的平台。在混合渠道中,平台同时使用转售渠道和代理渠道。因此,平台可以根据通过代理渠道销售的代理商(制造商或第三方零售商)选择两种混合渠道结构。同时,由于混合渠道结构带来的激烈竞争,平台主动实施产品质量分配策略,通过各种零售渠道销售不同质量的产品。因此,从平台的角度来看,如何协调混合渠道结构的选择和产品质量分配策略的实施是现有文献中被忽视的重要问题。本文提出了博弈论模型,以研究平台是否应该选择“哪种”混合渠道结构以及是否应采用产品质量分配策略。我们的分析表明,博弈均衡受到佣金率、产品差异化水平和生产成本的影响。具体来说,首先,有趣的是,如果产品差异化水平超过特定阈值,产品质量分配策略可能会对零售商产生负面影响,导致其放弃混合零售模式。相反,制造商继续通过代理渠道作为产品分销计划的一部分进行销售。其次,无论渠道配置如何,我们发现平台都会借助产品分销计划增加订单量。第三,与普遍看法相反,只有当第三方零售商以适当的佣金率和产品差异化水平参与混合零售时,产品质量分配策略才对平台有利。第四,平台应同时做出上述两项策略的决策;否则,代理销售商(制造商或第三方零售商)将反对产品质量分配策略。我们的主要发现可以帮助利益相关者做出关于混合零售模式和产品分销的战略决策。