Division of General & Community Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH; College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
J Pediatr. 2023 Aug;259:113492. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113492. Epub 2023 May 16.
To examine hypothesized predictors of adolescent and parent involvement in the decision about which genomic results to receive.
We conducted a longitudinal cohort study during phase 3 of the electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network. Dyads reported on how they preferred to make choices (adolescent only, parent only, or jointly). Dyads used a decision tool to choose independently the categories of genetic testing results they wanted. We summarized independent choices, identifying initially discordant dyads. After a facilitated discussion, dyads made a joint decision. Dyads then completed the Decision-Making Involvement Scale (DMIS). We conducted bivariate correlations between DMIS subscale scores and the following hypothesized predictors: adolescent age, preference for adolescent to make their own decision, and discordance on initial independent choices.
The sample included 163 adolescents, aged 13-17 years and parents (86.5% mothers). Dyads lacked agreement on how they wanted to make the final decision (weighted kappa statistic 0.04; 95% CI -0.08 to 0.16). These preferences, as well as the adolescent's age and adolescent-parent discordance on initial choices for specific categories of genetic testing results to receive, were associated with subsequent decision-making involvement behaviors as measured by DMIS subscales. Dyads with discordant initial preferences had significantly greater scores on the DMIS Joint/Options subscale than those with concordant initial preferences (adolescent report M [SD] 2.46 [0.60] vs 2.10 [0.68], P < .001).
Through facilitated discussion, adolescents and parents can work together and reach agreement about receipt of genomic screening results.
探讨假设的预测因素,这些因素与青少年和家长在决定接受哪些基因组结果方面的参与有关。
我们在电子病历和基因组学(eMERGE)网络的第 3 阶段进行了一项纵向队列研究。对青少年和父母的双体报告了他们更喜欢做出选择的方式(仅青少年、仅父母或共同选择)。双体使用决策工具独立选择他们想要的遗传测试结果类别。我们总结了独立选择,确定了最初不一致的双体。在进行了一次有组织的讨论后,双体做出了共同决定。然后,双体完成了决策参与量表(DMIS)。我们对 DMIS 子量表评分与以下假设预测因素之间进行了双变量相关性分析:青少年年龄、青少年自己做决定的偏好以及初始独立选择的分歧。
该样本包括 163 名年龄在 13-17 岁的青少年和父母(96.5%为母亲)。双体在最终决策方式上存在分歧(加权 kappa 统计量为 0.04;95%CI-0.08 至 0.16)。这些偏好以及青少年的年龄和青少年-父母在接受特定类别遗传测试结果方面的初始选择分歧,与 DMIS 子量表衡量的后续决策参与行为相关。初始偏好不一致的双体在 DMIS 联合/选项子量表上的得分明显高于初始偏好一致的双体(青少年报告的 M[SD]为 2.46[0.60] vs 2.10[0.68],P<0.001)。
通过有组织的讨论,青少年和父母可以共同努力并就接受基因组筛查结果达成一致。