• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经前路腰大肌入路腰椎间隙准备术中常规透视与基于计算机断层扫描导航系统疗效比较:尸体研究。

Comparing Efficacy of Lumbar Disc Space Preparation via an Anterior-to-Psoas Approach Between Intraoperative Conventional Fluoroscopy and Computed Tomographic-Based Navigation System: A Cadaveric Study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand; Center of Excellence in Biomechanics and Innovative Spine Surgery, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2023 Aug;176:e226-e231. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.05.035. Epub 2023 May 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2023.05.035
PMID:37201786
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of intervertebral disc space preparation via an anterior-to-psoas (ATP) approach using conventional fluoroscopy (Flu) and computer tomography (CT)-based navigation by evaluating the disc remaining area.

METHODS

We equally assigned 24 lumbar disc levels from 6 cadavers into Flu and CT-based navigation (Nav) groups. Two surgeons performed disc space preparation using the ATP approach in both groups. Digital images of each vertebral endplate were obtained, and the remaining disc tissue was calculated in total and in quadrants. Operative time, number of attempts at disc removal, endplate violation area, number of endplate violation segments, and access angle were recorded.

RESULTS

The overall percentage of remaining disc tissue was significantly less in the Nav group than in the Flu group (32.7% vs. 43.3% respectively, P < 0.001). A significant difference was found in the posterior-ipsilateral (4.2% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.005) and posterior-contralateral (6.1% vs. 10.9%, P = 0.002) quadrants, respectively. No significant between-group difference was found concerning operative time, number of attempts at disc removal, endplate violation area, number of endplate violation segments, or access angle.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative CT-based navigation may improve vertebral endplate preparation quality for an ATP approach, especially in the posterior quadrants. This technique may offer an effective alternative disc space and endplate preparation methods and may help enhance the fusion rates.

摘要

目的

通过评估椎间盘剩余面积,比较经前路至腰大肌(ATP)入路进行椎间盘间隙准备时,使用传统透视(Flu)和基于计算机断层扫描(CT)导航的效果。

方法

我们将 6 具尸体的 24 个腰椎间盘水平平均分配到 Flu 组和 CT 导航(Nav)组。两组均由两名外科医生采用 ATP 入路进行椎间盘间隙准备。获得每个椎板终板的数字图像,并计算总椎间盘组织和四个象限的剩余椎间盘组织。记录手术时间、椎间盘去除尝试次数、终板破坏面积、终板破坏节段数和入路角度。

结果

Nav 组的椎间盘剩余组织百分比明显低于 Flu 组(分别为 32.7%和 43.3%,P<0.001)。在后外侧(4.2% vs. 7.1%,P=0.005)和后对侧(6.1% vs. 10.9%,P=0.002)象限,差异有统计学意义。两组在手术时间、椎间盘去除尝试次数、终板破坏面积、终板破坏节段数和入路角度方面无显著差异。

结论

术中基于 CT 的导航可能会提高 ATP 入路的椎板终板准备质量,尤其是在后象限。该技术可能提供一种有效的替代椎间盘间隙和终板准备方法,并有助于提高融合率。

相似文献

1
Comparing Efficacy of Lumbar Disc Space Preparation via an Anterior-to-Psoas Approach Between Intraoperative Conventional Fluoroscopy and Computed Tomographic-Based Navigation System: A Cadaveric Study.经前路腰大肌入路腰椎间隙准备术中常规透视与基于计算机断层扫描导航系统疗效比较:尸体研究。
World Neurosurg. 2023 Aug;176:e226-e231. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.05.035. Epub 2023 May 16.
2
Comparing Lumbar Disc Space Preparation With Fluoroscopy Versus Cone Beam-Computed Tomography and Navigation: A Cadaveric Study.比较腰椎间盘间隙准备与透视、锥形束 CT 和导航:尸体研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Jul 15;43(14):959-964. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002526.
3
An in vitro study examining a novel suction curette device for lumbar discectomy compared with standard manual discectomy.一项体外研究,比较了一种用于腰椎间盘切除术的新型吸引刮匙装置与标准手动椎间盘切除术。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Apr;26(4):454-458. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.SPINE16283. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
4
Disc space preparation in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparison of minimally invasive and open approaches.经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术中的椎间盘间隙准备:微创与开放入路的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1800-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3479-z.
5
In vitro comparison of endplate preparation between four mini-open interbody fusion approaches.四种微创开放椎间融合术式终板处理的体外比较
Eur Spine J. 2015 Apr;24 Suppl 3:372-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3708-x. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
6
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Intraoperative Fluoroscopy for Disc Space Preparation: Analysis of Fusion Rate and Clinical Results.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术中透视下椎间盘空间准备:融合率和临床结果分析。
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020 Oct 15;19(5):557-566. doi: 10.1093/ons/opaa178.
7
[Case-control study on endplate injury of lumbar spine with two different intervertebral fusion methods].[两种不同椎间融合方法治疗腰椎终板损伤的病例对照研究]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2022 Oct 25;35(10):933-42. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2022.10.006.
8
The Oblique Anterolateral Approach to the Lumbar Spine Provides Access to the Lumbar Spine With Few Early Complications.腰椎斜前外侧入路可显露腰椎,早期并发症较少。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Sep;474(9):2020-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4883-3. Epub 2016 May 9.
9
Navigated percutaneous lumbosacral interbody fusion: a feasibility study with three-dimensional surgical simulation and cadaveric experiment.导航经皮腰骶椎间融合术:三维手术模拟与尸体实验的可行性研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jul 15;36(16):E1105-11. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181fc22d4.
10
Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral discs in the lateral position: an anatomic study.侧卧位经腹膜后斜行入路 L2-S1 椎间盘:解剖学研究。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Nov;21(5):785-93. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.SPINE13564. Epub 2014 Sep 12.