• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用建筑信息模型评估的中国东北地区养猪场建筑的碳足迹和水足迹分析。

Carbon and water footprint analysis of pig farm buildings in Northeast China using building-information-modeling enabled assessment.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering in Structure and Environment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China; Beijing Engineering Research Center on Animal Healthy Environment, 100083 Beijing, China.

College of Biochemical Engineering, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100023, China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2023 Aug 25;888:164088. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164088. Epub 2023 May 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164088
PMID:37201854
Abstract

Environmental impact evaluation of buildings is critical for further analysis and optimization of pig farms for sustainable pork production. This study is the first attempt to quantify the carbon and water footprints of a standard intensive pig farm building using building information modeling (BIM) and operation simulation model. The model was constructed with carbon emission and water consumption coefficients, and a database was built. The results showed that the operational stage of pig farm accounted for most of the carbon footprint (49.3-84.9 %) and water footprint (65.5-92.5 %). Building materials production ranked second in carbon (12.0-42.5 %) and water footprints (4.4-24.9 %), and pig farm maintenance ranked third in carbon (1.7-5.7 %) and water footprints (0.7-3.6 %). Notably, the mining and production stages of building materials contributed the largest carbon and water footprints of pig farm construction. Masonry materials have a significant impact on the overall carbon and water footprints of the pig farm. Pig farm using aerated concrete could reduce 41.1 % of the total carbon footprint and 58.9 % of the total water footprint compared to that using coal gangue sintered brick and autoclaved fly ash brick. This study presented a BIM-enabled method for carbon and water footprint analysis of pig farms and illustrated how the model can be used to facilitate the low carbon design of agricultural buildings.

摘要

建筑物的环境影响评价对于进一步分析和优化养猪场以实现可持续猪肉生产至关重要。本研究首次尝试使用建筑信息模型 (BIM) 和运营模拟模型量化标准集约化养猪场建筑的碳足迹和水足迹。该模型使用碳排放和耗水系数构建,并建立了数据库。结果表明,养猪场的运营阶段占碳足迹(49.3-84.9%)和水足迹(65.5-92.5%)的大部分。建筑材料生产在碳足迹(12.0-42.5%)和水足迹(4.4-24.9%)方面排名第二,而养猪场维护在碳足迹(1.7-5.7%)和水足迹(0.7-3.6%)方面排名第三。值得注意的是,建筑材料的开采和生产阶段对养猪场建设的碳足迹和水足迹贡献最大。砌体材料对养猪场的整体碳足迹和水足迹有重大影响。与使用煤矸石烧结砖和蒸压粉煤灰砖相比,使用加气混凝土的养猪场可减少 41.1%的总碳足迹和 58.9%的总水足迹。本研究提出了一种基于 BIM 的养猪场碳足迹和水足迹分析方法,并说明了如何使用该模型促进农业建筑的低碳设计。

相似文献

1
Carbon and water footprint analysis of pig farm buildings in Northeast China using building-information-modeling enabled assessment.采用建筑信息模型评估的中国东北地区养猪场建筑的碳足迹和水足迹分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Aug 25;888:164088. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164088. Epub 2023 May 16.
2
A case study of the carbon footprint of milk from high-performing confinement and grass-based dairy farms.高产封闭式奶牛场和草地奶牛场牛奶碳足迹的案例研究。
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Mar;97(3):1835-51. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7174. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
3
LIFE BEEF CARBON: a common framework for quantifying grass and corn based beef farms' carbon footprints.生命牛肉碳:一种用于量化草饲和谷饲牛肉农场碳足迹的通用框架。
Animal. 2020 Apr;14(4):834-845. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119002519. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
4
Diversification not specialization reduces global and local environmental burdens from livestock production.多元化而非专业化可减少畜牧业生产对全球和地方环境的负担。
Environ Int. 2019 Nov;132:104837. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.031. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
5
Food Footprint as a Measure of Sustainability for Grazing Dairy Farms.食物足迹作为衡量放牧奶牛场可持续性的指标。
Environ Manage. 2018 Dec;62(6):1073-1088. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1101-y. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
6
Comparative Study on Life-Cycle Assessment and Carbon Footprint of Hybrid, Concrete and Timber Apartment Buildings in Finland.芬兰混合、混凝土和木质公寓建筑的生命周期评估和碳足迹比较研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 11;19(2):774. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020774.
7
Actions to reduce carbon footprint in materials to healthcare buildings.减少医疗建筑材料碳足迹的行动。
Heliyon. 2022 Oct 26;8(11):e11281. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11281. eCollection 2022 Nov.
8
Mitigating environmental impacts using net energy system in feed formulation in China's pig production.在中国的养猪生产中,通过净能系统在饲料配方中减轻环境影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jan 15;856(Pt 1):159103. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159103. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
9
Carbon emissions from smallholder pig production in China: a precise account based on farmers' survey.中国小农养猪的碳排放:基于农户调查的精确估算。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(17):25651-25664. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17720-y. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
10
Carbon footprint of dairy goat milk production in New Zealand.新西兰奶山羊奶生产的碳足迹
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Jul;98(7):4279-93. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-9104. Epub 2015 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-Time Pig Weight Assessment and Carbon Footprint Monitoring Based on Computer Vision.基于计算机视觉的生猪实时体重评估与碳足迹监测
Animals (Basel). 2025 Sep 5;15(17):2611. doi: 10.3390/ani15172611.