Suppr超能文献

多元化而非专业化可减少畜牧业生产对全球和地方环境的负担。

Diversification not specialization reduces global and local environmental burdens from livestock production.

机构信息

School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Deiniol Road, Bangor LL57 2UW, UK; Sir William Roberts Centre for Sustainable Land Use, Bangor University, Deiniol Road, Bangor LL57 2DG, UK.

IBERS, Aberystwyth University, Ceredigion, Aberystwyth SY23 3EB, UK.

出版信息

Environ Int. 2019 Nov;132:104837. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.031. Epub 2019 Aug 23.

Abstract

Milk and beef production generates environmental burdens globally and locally. Across many regions a typical dairy intensification pathway is for dairy farms to specialize on milk production and reduce the co-production of beef (i.e. 'dairy-beef'). Dairy-beef thus reduces and beef needs to be produced elsewhere if beef production is to be maintained. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies quantifying the environmental implications of dairy and beef production have largely focused on the farm level and not captured system connections. Further LCA work has generally represented the 'average' farm of a region, consequently ignoring the range in farm management observed in practice and few studies consider a range of LCA environmental footprints other than carbon footprints. For the first time, we present comprehensive LCA results for multiple environmental burdens based on a large panel dataset for commercial dairy and suckler-beef farms. We present a 15-year LCA assessment of a total of 738 dairy (3624 data points in 15 years) and 1887 suckler-beef (10,340 data points in 15 years) UK farms for five major LCA footprints. We also explore the footprint implications of compensating for reduced dairy-beef through producing this 'displaced' beef on suckler-beef farms. We found a substantial variation in farm footprints not captured in 'average farm' studies. Dairy-beef was much more efficient than beef produced on suckler-beef farms in terms of footprints per unit of beef output. Reducing dairy-beef and replacing it on a suckler-beef farm generally significantly increased environmental burdens. A reduction in carbon footprint was also associated with a reduction in other burdens suggesting no trade-off between local and global emissions. Increasing dairy farm diversification via higher dairy-beef output per unit of milk reduced burdens by up to 11-56%, on average, depending on burden and sensitivity run. We conclude that overspecialization of dairy farms in milk production increases the combined burdens from beef and milk, and that more intensive beef systems that make more efficient use of forage land play a crucial role in mitigating these burdens.

摘要

牛奶和牛肉生产在全球和本地产生环境负担。在许多地区,一种典型的奶牛集约化途径是奶牛场专门从事牛奶生产,并减少牛肉的共同生产(即“奶牛-牛肉”)。因此,如果要维持牛肉生产,奶牛-牛肉的产量就会减少,而需要在其他地方生产牛肉。量化牛奶和牛肉生产的环境影响的生命周期评估 (LCA) 研究主要集中在农场层面,并未捕捉到系统联系。进一步的 LCA 工作通常代表了一个地区的“平均”农场,因此忽略了实践中观察到的农场管理范围,很少有研究考虑除碳足迹以外的一系列 LCA 环境足迹。我们首次根据商业奶牛和奶牛-肉牛农场的大型面板数据集,提供了多种环境负担的综合 LCA 结果。我们对英国 738 家奶牛场(15 年内共 3624 个数据点)和 1887 家奶牛-肉牛场(15 年内共 10340 个数据点)进行了为期 15 年的 LCA 评估,评估了五个主要的 LCA 足迹。我们还探讨了通过在奶牛-肉牛农场生产这种“替代”牛肉来补偿减少的奶牛-牛肉对足迹的影响。我们发现,在“平均农场”研究中未捕获到农场足迹的巨大差异。就每单位牛肉产量的足迹而言,奶牛-牛肉比奶牛-肉牛农场生产的牛肉效率更高。减少奶牛-牛肉并将其替换到奶牛-肉牛农场通常会显著增加环境负担。碳足迹的减少也与其他负担的减少相关,这表明本地和全球排放之间没有权衡。通过增加每单位牛奶的奶牛-牛肉产量来增加奶牛场的多样化,可将负担平均减少 11-56%,具体取决于负担和敏感性运行。我们的结论是,奶牛场过度专业化生产牛奶会增加牛肉和牛奶的综合负担,而更集约化的牛肉系统更有效地利用饲料地,在减轻这些负担方面发挥着至关重要的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验