Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Dec;19(12):5407-5417. doi: 10.1002/alz.13128. Epub 2023 May 19.
Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 may interact with response to amyloid-targeting therapies.
Aggregate data from trials enrolling participants with amyloid-positive, early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (AD) were analyzed for disease progression.
Pooled analysis of potentially efficacious antibodies lecanemab, aducanumab, solanezumab, and donanemab shows slightly better efficacy in APOE ε4 carriers than in non-carriers. Carrier and non-carrier mean (95% confidence interval) differences from placebo using Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) were -0.30 (-0.478, -0.106) and -0.20 (-0.435, 0.042) and AD Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) values were -1.01 (-1.577, -0.456) and -0.80 (-1.627, 0.018), respectively. Decline in the APOE ε4 non-carrier placebo group was equal to or greater than that in carriers across multiple scales. Probability of study success increases as the representation of the carrier population increases.
We hypothesize that APOE ε4 carriers have same or better response than non-carriers to amyloid-targeting therapies and similar or less disease progression with placebo in amyloid-positive trials.
Amyloid-targeting therapies had slightly greater efficacy in apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 carriers. Clinical decline is the same/slightly faster in amyloid-positive APOE ε4 non-carriers. Prevalence of non-carriers in trial populations could impact outcomes.
载脂蛋白 E (APOE) ε4 可能与针对淀粉样蛋白的治疗反应有关。
对招募淀粉样蛋白阳性、早期有症状的阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的试验进行汇总数据分析,以评估疾病进展情况。
对潜在有效的抗体 lecanemab、aducanumab、solanezumab 和 donanemab 的汇总分析表明,APOE ε4 携带者的疗效略优于非携带者。使用临床痴呆评定量表总和评分(CDR-SB),携带者和非携带者与安慰剂相比的平均(95%置信区间)差值分别为 -0.30(-0.478,-0.106)和 -0.20(-0.435,0.042),AD 评估量表认知子量表(ADAS-Cog)值分别为 -1.01(-1.577,-0.456)和 -0.80(-1.627,0.018)。在多个量表中,APOE ε4 非携带者安慰剂组的下降幅度与携带者相当或更大。随着携带者人群的代表性增加,研究成功的概率也随之增加。
我们假设,与非携带者相比,针对淀粉样蛋白的治疗在 APOE ε4 携带者中具有相同或更好的疗效,并且在淀粉样蛋白阳性试验中,与安慰剂相比,疾病进展相似或更少。
针对淀粉样蛋白的治疗在载脂蛋白 E (APOE) ε4 携带者中具有稍高的疗效。在 APOE ε4 非携带者的淀粉样蛋白阳性试验中,临床下降速度相同/稍快。试验人群中非携带者的患病率可能会影响结果。