• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性椎基底动脉闭塞再通的预后因素:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。

Prognostic factors for acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion-reperfusion: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital.

The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2023 Aug 1;109(8):2303-2311. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000476.

DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000000476
PMID:37204451
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10442092/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to analyze the long-term prognostic factors in acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (VBAO) patients treated with endovascular treatment (EVT).

METHODS

This study was performed using the acute posterior circulation ischemic stroke registry database from 21 stroke centers in 18 cities in China and retrospectively included consecutive patients aged 18 years or older with an acute, symptomatic, radiologically confirmed VBAO who were treated with EVT between December 2015 and December 2018. Favorable clinical outcomes were evaluated by machine-learning methods. A clinical signature was constructed in the training cohort using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and was validated in the validation cohort.

RESULTS

From 28 potential factors, 7 variables were independent prognostic factors and were included in the model: Modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (M) [odds ratio (OR): 2.900; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.566-5.370], age (A) (OR, 0.977; 95% CI: 0.961-0.993), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (N) (13-27 vs. ≤12: OR, 0.491; 95% CI: 0.275-0.876; ≥28 vs. ≤12: OR, 0.148; 95% CI: 0.076-0.289), atrial fibrillation (A) (OR, 2.383; 95% CI: 1.444-3.933), Glasgow Coma Scale (G) (OR, 2.339; 95% CI: 1.383-3.957), endovascular stent-retriever thrombectomy (E) (stent-retriever vs. aspiration: OR, 0.375; 95% CI: 0.156-0.902), and estimated time of onset of the occlusion to groin puncture (Time) (OR, 0.950; 95% CI: 0.909-0.993) (abbreviated as MANAGE Time). In the internal validation set, this model was well calibrated with good discrimination [C-index (95% CI)=0.790 (0.755-0.826)]. A calculator based on the model can be found online ( http://ody-wong.shinyapps.io/1yearFCO/ ).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that optimizing for EVT, along with specific risk stratification, may improve long-term prognosis. However, a larger prospective study is needed to confirm the findings.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在分析接受血管内治疗(EVT)的急性椎基底动脉闭塞(VBAO)患者的长期预后因素。

方法

本研究使用来自中国 18 个城市 21 个卒中中心的急性后循环缺血性卒中登记数据库,回顾性纳入 2015 年 12 月至 2018 年 12 月期间接受 EVT 治疗的年龄在 18 岁及以上的急性、症状性、影像学证实的 VBAO 连续患者。采用机器学习方法评估临床转归。在训练队列中使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归构建临床特征,并在验证队列中进行验证。

结果

从 28 个潜在因素中,有 7 个变量是独立的预后因素,被纳入模型:改良脑梗死溶栓(M)[比值比(OR):2.900;95%置信区间(CI):1.566-5.370]、年龄(A)(OR,0.977;95%CI:0.961-0.993)、国立卫生研究院卒中量表(N)(13-27 分比≤12 分:OR,0.491;95%CI:0.275-0.876;≥28 分比≤12 分:OR,0.148;95%CI:0.076-0.289)、心房颤动(A)(OR,2.383;95%CI:1.444-3.933)、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(G)(OR,2.339;95%CI:1.383-3.957)、血管内支架取栓术(E)(支架取栓术比抽吸术:OR,0.375;95%CI:0.156-0.902)和闭塞至股动脉穿刺时间(Time)(OR,0.950;95%CI:0.909-0.993)(简称 MANAGE Time)。在内部验证集中,该模型具有良好的校准度和区分度[C 指数(95%CI)=0.790(0.755-0.826)]。基于该模型的计算器可在网上找到(http://ody-wong.shinyapps.io/1yearFCO/)。

结论

我们的结果表明,通过优化 EVT 治疗,并进行特定的风险分层,可能会改善长期预后。然而,需要更大的前瞻性研究来证实这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef7/10442092/0efc38a8d82e/js9-109-2303-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef7/10442092/a988475b5cab/js9-109-2303-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef7/10442092/4b1f676bf7d7/js9-109-2303-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef7/10442092/0efc38a8d82e/js9-109-2303-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef7/10442092/a988475b5cab/js9-109-2303-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef7/10442092/4b1f676bf7d7/js9-109-2303-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef7/10442092/0efc38a8d82e/js9-109-2303-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Prognostic factors for acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion-reperfusion: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.急性椎基底动脉闭塞再通的预后因素:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2023 Aug 1;109(8):2303-2311. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000476.
2
[The influence of first-line endovascular treatment on clinical outcome in patients with acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion].[一线血管内治疗对急性椎基底动脉闭塞患者临床结局的影响]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Nov 1;60(11):970-976. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20210113-00032.
3
Outcomes Following Mechanical Thrombectomy in Different Etiological Subtypes of Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion : Stroke Etiology and Outcome after EVT in BAO.不同病因急性基底动脉闭塞机械取栓的结局:急性基底动脉闭塞血管内治疗的卒中和病因结局研究。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2023 Jun;33(2):361-374. doi: 10.1007/s00062-022-01217-3. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
4
Predictors of favorable outcomes for vertebrobasilar artery occlusion after endovascular therapy within 24 hours of symptom onset.血管内治疗 24 小时内症状发作后基底动脉闭塞的良好结局预测因素。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Feb;201:106422. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106422. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
5
Predictors of Good Outcome After Stent-Retriever Thrombectomy in Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion.急性基底动脉闭塞患者使用取栓支架取栓术后良好预后的预测因素
Stroke. 2015 Oct;46(10):2972-5. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010840. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
6
Predictors of poor outcome after endovascular treatment for acute vertebrobasilar occlusion: data from ANGEL-ACT registry.急性椎基底动脉闭塞血管内治疗后预后不良的预测因素:来自ANGEL-ACT注册研究的数据
Neuroradiology. 2023 Jan;65(1):177-184. doi: 10.1007/s00234-022-03065-x. Epub 2022 Oct 24.
7
Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever Thrombectomy for Distal, Medium Vessel Occlusion Stroke in the Posterior Circulation: A Subanalysis of the TOPMOST Study.抽吸与支架取栓治疗后循环中远段中等血管闭塞性卒中:TOPMOST 研究的亚组分析。
Stroke. 2022 Aug;53(8):2449-2457. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037792. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
8
Effect of Thrombectomy With Combined Contact Aspiration and Stent Retriever vs Stent Retriever Alone on Revascularization in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and Large Vessel Occlusion: The ASTER2 Randomized Clinical Trial.接触性抽吸联合支架取栓与单纯支架取栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中伴大血管闭塞患者的血管再通效果比较:ASTER2 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Sep 28;326(12):1158-1169. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.13827.
9
Importance of Occlusion Site for Thrombectomy Technique in Stroke: Comparison Between Aspiration and Stent Retriever.闭塞部位对取栓术治疗脑卒中的重要性:抽吸与支架取栓的比较
Stroke. 2021 Jan;52(1):80-90. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030031. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
10
Outcome of endovascular treatment for acute basilar artery occlusion in the modern era: a single institution experience.现代急性基底动脉闭塞血管内治疗的结局:单中心经验
Neuroradiology. 2018 Jun;60(6):651-659. doi: 10.1007/s00234-018-2011-7. Epub 2018 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
AI prediction model for endovascular treatment of vertebrobasilar occlusion with atrial fibrillation.用于合并心房颤动的椎基底动脉闭塞血管内治疗的人工智能预测模型
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Feb 2;8(1):78. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01478-5.
2
Commentary on 'Prognostic factors for acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion-reperfusion: a multicenter retrospective cohort study'.《急性椎基底动脉闭塞再灌注的预后因素:一项多中心回顾性队列研究》述评
Int J Surg. 2024 Dec 1;110(12):8175-8176. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001668.
3
Clinical predictors of prognosis in stroke patients after endovascular therapy.
血管内治疗后脑卒中患者预后的临床预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 5;14(1):667. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51356-5.
4
A commentary on 'Prognostic factors for acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion-reperfusion: a multicenter retrospective cohort study'.对《急性椎基底动脉闭塞再灌注的预后因素:一项多中心回顾性队列研究》的述评
Int J Surg. 2024 Feb 1;110(2):1279-1280. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000878.